Going to guess they are in China.
this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
498 points (100.0% liked)
News
28316 readers
2604 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Stealing the top comment:
See what's sad is that there could be real national security reasons for the FBI/DOJ actions, but because the pattern lately has been un-uniformed randos detaining people in the streets (and then disappearing them), I'm fresh out of benefits of the doubt for the government here.
If they're the subject of a criminal investigation, say so. If they're not, then explain why nobody has heard from these people in seemingly weeks. Are they green card holders? US citizens?
The Nazis historically did go after universities and professors. If you ever take a class on Heidegger, it’s overshadowed by his membership in the party, and the fact he participated in carrying out the parties policy - firing all Jewish professors, including his friend Hussarl.
Colleges are places where ideas compete, and fascism cannot compete as an idea but only through force. The crypto angle might be part of this case, but we’ve already seen Florida and Texas trying to set up their own controlled university systems - fucking with colleges and professors is on the table.
Yes, it's why when you meet a fascist in the wild or online they will always counterargument with trolling and non-sequitur nonsense. Fascism cannot survive sincerity.
Obvious possibilities:
- he was suspected of espionage and arrested (we don't know whether he did anything), for some reason it hasn't been disclosed (it should be disclosed)
- he disappeared on his own, officials are trying to understand what he knew or accomplished
The university de-listing him seems particularly interesting. Clearly they were told something that the public wasn't told.
While in normal times that would makes sense as a likely possibility from what little we know, today it seems equally possible he’s in Guantanamo as an illegal immigrant hardened criminal who is clearly a member of the notorious Tren de Aragua gang. I’m sure he’s responsible for half the Fentanyl in the US
Fled the country after family harassed by ice, and this is retaliation ?
My first thought was Bruce Schneier
Did he hide a shitload of national security secrets in his bathroom with the chandelier?
Oh no wait, if he did that they’d have done NOTHING
they’d have done NOTHING
That's not fair. They'd have elected him President
This man must not have the flesh of a sunburnt marshmallow.
Looks like they found Satoshi Nakamoto and now Hegseth is gonna beat him with a sock fulla quarters til he gives Trump “all the bitcoins”
Huh, another good reason for sticking with physical money. You can't beat someone with a sock full of bitcoin.
That's what cold storage is for.
I'm not so sure. I'd take a sock full of quarters over a sock with a 3.5" spinning disc hard drive in it any day of the week.
Trump would spend the Satoshi coins.
The US government has known who Nakamoto was since like 2017
It’s probably Adam Back.
All the claims of who it might potentially be have been debunked one way or another. Someone was sure it was a Canadian guy not too long ago and he started getting harassed...
How did they debunk the claim that it might be Adam Back? Have a link?
There's tons of circumstantial evidence for a bunch of people, but Adam Back keeps talking about the value of Bitcoin (Satoshi would be one of the richest person on earth right now, he wouldn't care about its value anymore) and was against the changes necessary to make Bitcoin useful as a digital currency (leading to the 2017 fork).
Why did Satoshi create Bitcoin? Because he felt there was a need for a digital currency, not because he wanted to get rich. It's in the whitepaper.
That’s the weakest sauce “debunking” I’ve ever seen.
It’s been a while, but as I remember the arguments they give are:
- Back basically disappeared activity-wise from the relevant mailing list at the same time that Satoshi appeared, and everyone immediately trusted Satoshi and treated him as someone of value
- Similarities in writing style
- Back has given some odd answers in interviews when asked about Satoshi, that basically only make sense if he at least knows who it is
Is that ironclad? Certainly not. It is however a lot more convincing than “why would someone with a lot of money care whether the value of their money went UP or DOWN if they already had a lot? Checkmate”.
Why would he work against his goal of creating a digital currency then? Bitcoin is useless for that with transactions that can be left pending for hours because of the block size limit, which Back supported keeping as is.
Why would Adam Back work against the goal of creating a digital currency? Presumably, he had some sort of reason why he thought it would be better to do it the one way instead of the other way. Maybe in hindsight his logic was just wrong.
I have no idea of the technical details involved, maybe what you're saying does make sense. But your argument makes equal sense, to me, when applied to say that Adam Back couldn't possibly have taken that stance, as it does applied to say that Satoshi couldn't have taken that stance. I'm not convinced. I have no idea if the thing is true or not, but it seems pretty plausible to me, and the "debunking" does not at all.
Does it have to be one person?
It's one of the theories, that it was done by a collective with one person writing on the forum
Probably not
Why not?