this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
1849 points (99.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

7733 readers
3067 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zell565@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

"Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility" Ambrose Bierce

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 64 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We have a legal system that protects the rich and punishes the poor. Luigi gave us a taste of what the opposite could look like.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Should I DM the mod of this community and double check if it's okay for me to upvote? Oh silly me... this is lemmy. Of course it's okay to upvote this fact of life!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Dash that money

[–] sloppychops@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, that's basically how the entire hospitality industry operates at this point.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The early history behind tipping was basically to not pay black people and keep some simulacrum of slavery. Black people were historically pretty predominant in the hospitality industry - a good way to pay them shit, and make them dependent on the generosity of white people.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 2 months ago

Also I believe I found the related source: https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2025/attorney-general-james-secures-1675-million-doordash-cheating-delivery-workers

I didn't see anything on a quick read about how they came up with these numbers, or if there are any more serious penalties. Seems like a pretty light penalty.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 65 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Few things.

  1. Corporations are not people. Laws need to change and loopholes need to be closed.
  2. The rich need to pay their way. Laws need to change and loopholes need to be closed.
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The question is how are we gonna go about that.

[–] Nfamwap@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

We start by closing loopholes and making the rich pay their way.

And if they don't? Guillotines, baby!

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm all for that, truly.

How do we start?

We've been talking about this online for as long as I remember, and my beard is starting to get grey hairs. To be honest, it's been pumping up recently, but it's still just unorganised discontent instead of an actual organised effort to do something. And those do exist, yeah, but they don't rival the power of the large companies.

So I'm starting to lose my optimism.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Organizing is hard and I don't know how to do it, either. It doesn't help that a lot of media is owned by conservatives, and the police/gov't historically hasn't hesitated to murder organizers (see: fred hampon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Hampton )

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think it's easier for conservatives because they just attract morons and their aims aren't creating a unified entity to do something, rather it's to benefit personally.

It's way harder to create a peaceful global cooperative than it is to sow chaos and steal things.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also i think it's easier when you have the backing of the wealthy. i think the "tea party" had rich backers, for example, while 'occupy wall street' never had the same financial support.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think with the internet, we could actually change this.

I think that if there was a unified community, a properly large one, one could use the economic power derived from the consumers to target specific things.

Wouldn't need strikes. You'd just need an app to tell you what things not to buy for a week and what are the alternatives so you can still get your addiction on, whatever it may be (coffee, alcohol, dresses, chocolate, a specific type of heroin, who cares).

Like a global union, with the power that a full strike gives you, but without having to actually even strike.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

interesting, but the problem remains: how do you create that unified community? Left-wing people seem especially prone to infighting, at least compared to the right wing where big business and alleged christians are happy to get in bed together.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Oh, that's easy. I just claim I'm Jesus and gather the whole world behind me.

^/sarcasm

[–] Aneb@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

🐷✂🗑 I had to get creative, my keyboard doesn't have an guillotine emoji

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Pig-scissors-thrash is kinda clear tbh.

Luigi started. Who will take up the mantle?

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

All I can tell you is it has to get a lot worse before it gets better. I don't see change coming without bloodshed because those in power and their enablers don't want either of those things to happen.

[–] Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

They only have to go up to minimum wage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

"If it's done out of greed, they let you do it"

load more comments