this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
216 points (93.5% liked)

politics

21781 readers
4009 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

I did not buy a Tesla today and am thus in violation of the law.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Poor grammar aside, the headline is inaccurate. I am all in favor of people dumping Teslas, but Musk neither designed nor built any of them. He paid people to design them, then he paid people to build them. And by all accounts, he did not pay them well or treat them kindly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

Wait, you’re telling me he was not the chief engineer of space x whole simultaneously being the world champion at a video game?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 39 minutes ago

He seems to only have one actual skill, but to be fair, being born rich is very difficult to master.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Two additional words to the title make it easier to read.

THE Senator THAT Elon Musk called a “traitor” gets rid of his Tesla.

Can also replace that with who I reckon. Or whom? Where’s the grammar nazis when you need them. Oof they’re going to have to rebrand aren’t they since real nazis are back!

Also I hate title case. Why is it a thing?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 hours ago

The title gave me a headache.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, I don't think there is a way to edit the title, but I think this article would have been clearer with a comma. I'm going to leave it up, but sticky this here with a clearer title: "[The] Senator [Who] Elon Musk Called a 'Traitor' Gets Rid of His Tesla: Don't Want a Car Built By an 'A**hole'."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

Titles can absolutely be edited in Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The.

THE Senator...

Three letters, you couldn't spare THREE FUCKING LETTERS?

When these publication headline writers pass-on I hope the undertaker hideously abbreviates their tombstones!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

Dude I had to read the post headline like 4 times to figure that out. It was so confusing. At first I was like "shouldn't this say copresident Elon Musk?"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

Words to live by.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 hours ago

Musk is the president, not a senator. What a misleading headline.

[–] [email protected] 112 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

What a misleading and poorly written headline.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Such a strange sentence. Makes you "garden path" (reanalyze the syntax after already being deeper into the structure). Minimally need a "that" after "Senator".

Though it's uncommon usage, so that's actually a tick against it potentially being AI generated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

need a "that" after "Senator".

You mean 'who', right? Senators are (usually bad) people so let's not treat them like objects.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

"That" or "who" are both commonly used for animate arguments. And given it is an object here, "whom" would be the most pretentious option.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Wait, I read the article and the headline is pretty much on point? What am I missing?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Senator Elon Musk Called a ‘Traitor’ Gets Rid of His Tesla: Don’t Want a Car Built By An ‘A**hole’

This sounds like Elon is a Senator and was called a traitor; when it was actually Musk calling a Senator a traitor.

Try:

Senator, who was called a 'Traitor' by Elon Musk, Gets Rid of His Tesla: Don’t Want a Car Built By An ‘A**hole’

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

"Senator Elon Musk" is ambiguous phrasing. Obviously, what is meant is "Senator [that] Elon Musk", but it could also have been calling Aparthiedman himself a senator.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It reads like a gardenpath sentence.

For example (made up on the spot so excuse me if its crap)

Muscle man made harms others when using force

[Muscle that was made by man]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I like "The old man the ship"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Elon Musk isn't a Senator. The title as written reads that way by default.

A that shoved in the middle would fix that.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

I've never heard of the site Mediaite before. I didn't click the link, but plenty of AI slop sites are popping up and headlines like this are a good way to spot them.

EDIT: apparently the sites been around for a bit, and this seems to be a one off headline issue. The credited writer appears to have several articles without issues apparent at first glance. Another article says "White House attorney" but it's an attorney that's acting as a liaison. Maybe just a nitpick. Some sensationalist headlines. Same as I've seen elsewhere so nothing too egregious.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Its owned by Daniel Abrams, the guy who created Live PD and its spiritual successor, On Patrol: Live.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

Thank you for the link! Will edit my comment to reflect it's not new. It seems there's some question as to its journalistic merit with the wiki stating "The New York Times has described the site as "a blog that chronicles the gossipy media world"", but it seems it's been around for a bit at least.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

This would make more sense: Senator Who Was Called a 'Traitor' by Elon Musk Gets Rid of His Tesla: Don’t Want a Car Built By An ‘Asshole’

Also, it's Mark Kelly

Edit: fixed who called who what

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago

Thank you for your service.