this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
456 points (99.8% liked)

politics

22634 readers
2886 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He said speaking up during the address was the best way “get across to a person who uses his incivility, who uses his incivility against our civility.”

(page 2) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Is there some way we can show his office that the whole country is demanding their local constituents stand up like this?

Or our own local offices?

Call today, email, send this news story. Ask why your local rep didn't stand up. Show that we're demanding a fucking stand be made.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Wait, did Trump visit the House? Did I miss the state of the union?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The Democrats seemed unorganized, nobody is leading them like Trump is leading Republicans. Here's a gimmick I'd like to see them use next time.: Every time Trump says a blatant lie - call it out - LOUD. One by one, watch how many people get thrown out throughout the speech.

22 Billion cut to HHS is a ton though. Surely that will go toward paying down the deficit? Good on Green for bringing attention to it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago

It's an issue in the US that the opposition doesn't have a leader until the election is getting close, in a parliamentary system Harris would still be their leader until someone else took her place and she would dictate how the party acts in response to the Republicans.

They also need to learn a lesson from other countries and to form a shadow government.

[–] [email protected] 133 points 4 weeks ago

WHERE WERE THE REST OF THE DEMOCRATS? FUCKING SITTING. They didn't have the intestinal fortitude to be kindly escorted out like this old dude with a fucking cane; they walked Al out and their collective spine went with him. Johnson told them to shut up and they fucking did; they either sat there quietly with their stupid little signs, went to sleep, or walked out on their own. Fuck you, make me should be the order of the day! I've never been more ashamed of the democrats than this absolute display of submission with the slightest bit of bullying. Resistance my ass, resistance doesn't quietly walk itself out of the building!

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

Anyone watching it would have been just as angry at the horseshit coming out of Trump's mouth.

Literally everything he said was either a lie, some narcissistic ego jerk-off, a shot at Biden, or some racist rant about "most immigrants are murderers".

And the clapping and cheering. Disturbing cultism.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Wow good job holding a sign! Maybe she can march in a protest next.

Kudos to Green for actually doing something though. Good to know not all Dems are completely shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 month ago

Thank you Al Green. At least you stood up.

[–] [email protected] 84 points 1 month ago

Democratic Lawmaker ejected from House after DOING HIS JOB!!

[–] [email protected] 258 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (13 children)

Why didn't every Democrat step forward and PHYSICALLY bar him from being removed. They just sat there and let him be ejected. STAND THE FUCK UP

[–] [email protected] -5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (6 children)

Even AOC sat quietly? Why wasn't she fucking protesting?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Not saying I disagree with your premise.

However, there are some strange brew rules that come into play depending on the #of reps in attendance in the house. You dwindle the dem #s enough and you end up allowing the reps the ability to run amok with the kinds of legislation they’re salivating to pass.

I’m sure this was at top of mind for some of the folks in attendance.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

You dwindle the dem #s enough and you end up allowing the reps the ability to run amok with the kinds of legislation they’re salivating to pass.

That's why there's also quorum rules. There has to be a minimum of X% of the congresspeople present for anything to count and I'm 99.9% certain that all of the Dems leaving would bring the number present under that even if every single Republican was present.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

First you have to call a meeting to order, you can't do that without quorum

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 weeks ago

It reminded me, very randomly, of quote from a book about urban design and how architectural ideas are introduced and accepted by the public… or not.

From this the "principle of the second man" can be formulated: it is the second man who determines whether the creation of the first man will be carried forward or destroyed...

It was a golden chance and a room full of cowards let it slip.


The book is Design of Cities by Edmund Bacon for anyone interested.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 weeks ago

I kept waiting for it! For a moment, I had a swell of hope that they were going to force the Sargeant at Arms to remove them one by one, or else block Al from being removed, something, anything with a little fucking Chutzpah, but nope. They all just sat down, shut up, and waved their stupid little signs. Good job guys, I can't wait to see your next fundraising text.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Democrats are spineless cowards and/or complicit.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

people who criticize dems from their sofa are the secret spinless trump supporters

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

How's that party whip taste? Sounds like you'd do well in an authoritarian one-party state as long as the party pretends to be in partial agreement with you.

I hear Shanghai is lovely this time of year..

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because they’re weaker than wet tissue paper.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 weeks ago

True, unless it comes to fighting progressives in their own party. Then they suddenly remember how to fight.

[–] [email protected] 142 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I thought the same thing. Then I thought about how powerful of a visual it would have been for each one of them, in turn, to cause a disruption and be escorted out. Let the cameras pan over a half filled chamber after 2 hours of meticulous protesting. That image would be in history books 100 years from now, assuming we all survive the next 4.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 month ago (5 children)

But that would have put their corporate donations in jeopardy!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When it was happening I was hoping deeply that another Democrat would pick after he was removed to filibuster the SOTU. I suppose it's naive of me but for a moment I thought the democrats had organized an actual visible protest.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 weeks ago

Sorry, best we can do is wearing pink shirts as a group and quietly walking out with our #resist t-shirts

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Apparently, they believe that sitting silently while waving tiny signs sent a stronger message.

Truly the greatest minds of our time.

EDIT: PINK! They also wore pink! I almost forgot! Just like everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

Those tiny round signs on sticks were absolutely ridiculous. What are they, crossing guards? Might as well be, because crossing guards would have more guts and more principles.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›