this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
240 points (96.9% liked)

politics

20368 readers
3536 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump administration cuts million dollars donation for Nepal.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 days ago

I'd like to thank DOGE for single handedly strengthening Chinas soft power around the world!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

Gotta pinch as many pennies as we can to fund the most important causes like funneling more money into the pockets of billionaires.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Foreign aid has hilariously good ROI. When I went to Africa, locals told me that the Bush admin introduced the concept of bug nets to prevent mosquito bites and malaria. A one-time program that probably cost Americans at most $10 drove a major cultural shift that has saved possibly millions of lives and has affected everyone. We'll literally buying goodwill.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

Musk has all the money in the world but has no real friends. He doesn't know what the value of anything other than money means, that's why these expenditures are nothing but waste to him.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Damn $19M for a biodiversity conversation?!?! What are they conversing about?! \s

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The thing is, you can make anything at all sound stupid if you try, and they are. There's many earth-shattering scientific studies that can be made to sound idiotic. You're not building a fission reactor, you're "finding out what happens when you stack spicy rocks and get them wet".

[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Its insane that these guys don’t realise that USAID and all these programs are all about soft power. So many of these countries are going to turn on the US and they’re going to shocked pikachu face when a bunch of new wars and terror attacks spring up.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You could just say "they'll act shocked".

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 days ago

Where’s the fun in that

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

They do, they are just removing the soft power “carrot” and are going to rely on military force instead. They rely on forcing people to conform because that’s all they know how to do as corporate dictators. Just view their actions as that of CEOs. The little people don’t matter and will do what they’re told. Manipulate investors and PR for more money and control. Take your golden parachute when everything falls apart.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Totally mad given that the US military has had a huge recruitment drought for years and that they're simultaneously gutting benefits.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Like I said. The little people don’t matter. Watch trump, assuming this coup destroys democracy as we know it and we become Republicanistan, force mandatory service.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They do, they just don't care.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't think they're aware that they're actively dismantling US empire by doing shit like this. They just think "this is charity. charity bad"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think they are absolutely aware. Musk has business in China. This is a gift to them so they scratch his back in return.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don’t agree. A quid pro quo with China and this admin would involve removing tariffs, not something so indirect like this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It's not with the administration, it's with Elon.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Tripping over pennies to lose dollars. These turds do not understand soft power and international trade.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's such an easy concept. I can't figure out if they actually don't get it because they are so narcissistic and why would anyone appreciate a few million in aid or if they are just playing stupid to posture to their base and be able to do even worse while everyone is distracted.

I think the later might be more accurate and I'm really curious what else I am missing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Never underestimate bad students who reject academically rigorous ideas because they're intimidated by smart people.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yup. And by the end of the week China will step in and replace all of that funding.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

And then we'll be left wondering why we're being kicked out of all our overseas bases. And then why the SEA countries are acquiescing to everything China wants and then why Taiwan gives up major concessions like allotting high quality computer parts to China.

It's all connected.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Why highlight Nepal specifically? You could highlight any country in the list and say funds were cut

[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Because I'm Nepali citizen

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

What are the things that they're trying to make out as stupid here, with the "fiscal federalism" and "biodiversity conversation"?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago

Op is a shill for Big Nepal

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Taking bets on him thinking it's some kind of DEI program for nipples.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago

Look how they snuck empowering women (in the USA) in the middle

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago

Well done to DOGE for absolutely tearing up the place scrounging up the US Government's metaphorical pennies, whilst ignoring actual budget inefficiencies, such as the infamously overzealous military budget

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

I'm not surprised he's against anti corruption campaigns in Serbia. That's kind of the opposite of his whole deal.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 days ago

They are deliberately not giving the time scale on these things, and this is all from inception of these programs. This is a cumulative total of spending over decades in most cases, and definitely over many years for others.

Fuck these assholes for trying to justify their existence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

We would save so much more if musk just fucking exploded.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

There's also a chance that many of these are employing Americans carrying out this work. So it may not even be the most extreme thought that "all this money is leaving America". He could be cutting American jobs, that pay American taxes (so a portion of that comes right back to the tax fund).

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

Yeah, fuck all these programs that legitimately help people; lets cut those, then spend 5x that money on bombs to be used in an ongoing genocide.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 6 days ago

This whole list amounts to $729 million. That is 20% of the $3.5 billion in additional money we sent in one month to Israel to buy bombs and missiles. You can see what kind of goodwill our government is really interested in "spreading". Maybe the USAID money was well spent and we could do something about the money that is going to death, misery and creating more hate against us? Crazy talk, I know.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What in all of that list am I supposed to be upset about? All i see are good causes to better medical and Democratic outcomes in other countries.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I’d rather my tax dollars be spent on these things, than more cyber trucks or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Ooh, ooh, look at the price of a single Tomahawk missile or anything else we regularly blow up, even in training exercises!

You can either aid democracy in South Africa, or have 1 Tomahawk. I wonder which does the most good...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

Any sane semi-intelligent human would agree but we don't live in that world.

Kinda curious what the reaction are but not enough to give that Nazi traffic.

load more comments
view more: next ›