this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
492 points (99.4% liked)

politics

23101 readers
3171 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Thats fine, I'm just as happy being fully "anti-religon" for equality.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Can we get a law in place that says if you have to sue the government to stop some obvious bullshit, that you recover your legal fees?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Jesus is pretty cool. You show me a christian who follows jesus' teachings, and I'll have mad respect. You give me some dipshit doing the most anti-christlike shit imaginable, but with crosses all around, and I'll make fun of him forever. Just a way of un-tarnishing the brand.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago

How many EOs does this dickhead have now in these two weeks alone?

How many does a normal president have in a full four year term?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't this still require specific existing laws (as in actual statutes) to charge someone with violating? Or can they just charge and convict on arbitrary things they don't like, now?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

The thing with Trump is, he doesn't care. He will do whatever he can until he's told he can't. So, until this gets challenged and makes its way through the courts, he will do it. So much of our system is built on "norms" that he can get away with doing things that seem like they shouldn't be allowed. Until democrats start doing the same, they'll keep losing for failing to do what the people want.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (3 children)

They're gearing up to roll out project 2025.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It ain't gonna be bloodless

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 months ago

They're not "gearing up;" it's steamrolling us as we speak.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And by "anti-xtian bias" he means, not properly privileging xtianity.

That's what these assholes complaining about xtian "persecution" ALWAYS mean. They hate to be ignored, too. Being told that their rules are FOR THEM and not anyone else in their book club, it absolutely infuriates them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

X was used by early Christians in place of Christ. It is the first letter of Christ in Greek, and was used as a discreet way to indicate that someone is a Christian - back when Christians were ACTUALLY persecuted.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Why say many words when few words work

[–] [email protected] 79 points 2 months ago (9 children)

I have a family member who told me last year that they believe Christians are the most persecuted group in the USA, even more so than gay people.

In truth it was very challenging to stay calm in the face of someone saying something so blatantly biased and false. Packaged as an opinion, of course, but presented as the truth.

I asked questions and challenged some of the statements being made, but I know for a fact that the only thing I accomplished is that she's unlikely to make that particular statement in front of me again. No minds were changed that day. It's just sad.

As someone who actually IS persecuted in this country for things I cannot change about myself, I really don't get why someone would want to live under the delusion that they are being persecuted when they otherwise aren't. It's not fun and there's no benefit to being persecuted.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

It's because their religion claims that whoever has the worst life on Earth will have the best life in Heaven, so they're constantly seeking out ways to reaffirm that they have it "so hard".

They associate the negativity of others towards them with godliness.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

In truth it was very challenging to stay calm in the face of someone saying something so blatantly biased and false.

Collectively, we really need to quit doing that. Failing to call out hateful bullshit because of some weird adherence to 'civility' is part of what got us to this point in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 2 months ago

And by that, they mean something like this? Xtians get all kinds of privileges and everyone else has to convert or be a second class citizen?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I have a family member who told me last year that they believe Christians are the most persecuted group in the USA, even more so than gay people.

I asked questions and challenged some of the statements being made

I imagine some of those questions included:

  1. How many christians in the USA were killed in the last 20 years only because they were christian?
  2. When was the last time a gathering of christians in a public library doing things unrelated to being christian forced to cease and desist?
  3. Is it common in society for a young adult living with parents to profess their love for christ and be thrown out of their homes and essentially abandoned by the family?
  4. Is there a history in this country to regularly arrest and prosecute christians for gathering or holding ceremonies like communion?

edit: A couple more additions.

  1. Has marriage between two christians been illegal for nearly the entirety of the existence of the USA?

  2. Are there camps that some misguided parents send their children to to be "deprogrammed" from being christian?

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They want to be David vs Goliath. Being the ones persecuted means that they can go on the offensive without feeling bad about it. It means whatever they do is justified as being a means of survival. It gives them an excuse.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Exactly, the Bible is written for the underdog. Constantly referencing persecution for the faith, which is non-existent in the USA, so they try to redefine what they see as micro aggressions as full on persecution. They simply want to be angry, righteous anger for Christ.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

They view their Belief System (BS) being put on the same plane as other mythologies, new or ancient, as somehow being "persecuted", since they are so used to having unwarranted privileges.

They've seen that unwarranted privilege being chipped away, ever so slowly, as xtianity dies off in number of adherents in the United States (dwindling down to 60-some percent, now) - trending toward what more normal advanced countries of the West are like, and they fucking hate it. They want everyone and every part of the culture to have them up on a pedestal again, even if it means violence, and a lot of it, because "Jesus".

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

The same way my friend freaks out about "anti-Apple bias" when we ask questions like "but for the cost, is that a good pair of earbuds vs this other pair at lower cost?"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I'm atheist. GFY, you imbecilic mango monkey.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I think this is a good time to promote a blog and podcast that I like:

https://friendlyatheist.com/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

It's about time. Those poor christians have always been marginalized in the USA, just like white men who own property. And billionaires. And the 1% in general. When will someone finally think of them?

If you can't read sarcasm in the above, you're too illiterate to be on the internet. Get off the internet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Fuck Pam Bondi and fuck fascist POS orange idiot! But above all fuck christians...all POS religions for that matter...religion poisons everything! Just imagine how much better off the world would be without the religious BS! What is brown nosing pam going to do with anti christian bias? Punish me for a hate crime? Thought crime? Fuck all religious ideology!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

As a reminder: The guy defending Christianity is a rapist and adulterer who set free 1500 criminals, including pedophiles and child rapists.

If Jesus was real, he would bitch slap Trump so hard it would take the paint off his face!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Christian Nationalists wanted their Nazi uprising, they got it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What happened to freedom of religion?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The xtianists think freedom of religion means choosing from one of hundreds of various xtian sects. They think freedom FROM religion does not exist in Jesusland.

They'll do to freedom FROM religion (which the first amendment requires) what they did to the right of privacy in Roe...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›