this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
149 points (92.6% liked)

Asklemmy

44705 readers
690 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So I'm 20 and I've started looking at the salaries of jobs/careers, and this is the impression I've gotten. Like that you could spend years cramming a ton of knowledge about a very niche field, and still only get 2-3x what a run-of-the-mill job makes. Is this true? If yes then I guess this route to wealth would only make sense (due to the diminishing returns) if the topic truly spoke to you, right? Are there alternative career paths to good pay than being really good at something really specific?

(page 2) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Generally speaking, wealth is not built by working. It's built by investing. It's possible to have a relatively small salary and get relatively wealthy if you consistently live below your means and invest the surplus. Power of compounding.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

What are your x and y axes here?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is somewhat off topic, but it is actually related to knowledge, income, and returns.

I'm telling you from experience, make enough money to live comfortably and stop when you get there. If at all possible, don't have a long commute. Don't have a prestige job. Don't have a position that requires OT or sprints. I deescalated my role to something more banal and my happiness went way up.

You're likely not in a position to do that at 20, but when you get somewhat into a career and life sucks and you hate your work and you want to die, start looking for something that pays less but also doesn't suck the life out of you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I would have agreed with this chart a decade ago but not now. I recently quit being an systems engineer to being a high voltage electrician. My job stress and required knowledge went down considerably, my pay went up 2x. I would love to recommend school but cannot as I feel like it was a waste for my career path.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

How do you measure expert knowledge on the same graph as salary? Do you measure it in dollars?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Your graph is missing the more important factor: demand.
I'm guessing you weren't born into money, which is what most ultra wealthy people do. So failing that, you need to cultivate a skillset which includes doing something that other people want and are willing to pay for. And yes, that often means learning specialized, or dangerous skills. Take something like a high voltage electrician, they can make good moeny but they need a specific skillset, certifications, and fucking up can mean dying very quickly. Construction divers or underwater welders can earn good money as well. Though again, specific skillsets, certifications, and risks. On the less risky side, programmers can make good money, though that usually does require a lot of learning. IT and cybersecurity also fit this bill, though they do tend to follow your graph.

In short, businesses pay for people because they have a need for something to get done. No need, no money. You can be the most knowledgeable person in the world about flaking stone tools, and you are going to be struggling. Another route to income is starting your own business, but this has similar pitfalls. Start a business which people aren't interested in and you're going to flounder. Also, running a business does take it's own skillset, beyond the skillset involved in whatever the business's focus area is. Though, done right, you can focus on running the business and hire people to do the other stuff.

You are falling into a trap a lot of young, smart people do. You are assuming that knowledge and intelligence is what you need to succeed. It's not your fault, you've been fed that line for the last 12-ish years of your life by schools and society. It's bullshit. They do help, but knowing the right people, luck and the ability to socialize are more important. In short, go to business school and go into management. If that doesn't appeal to you (and that is perfectly valid) then you need to find and learn skills that businesses are willing to pay for. At the moment, that probably means a trade, like electrician or welder; or, a technical role such as engineering, IT or programming. If your interest is in the Humanities, sorry you're probably fucked.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Networking in university got me my first jobs and they were very good starting jobs.

I don’t mean you have to go out and be fake, but get involved in a bunch of stuff, and make sure to check if your department has any corporate relationships you can use.

Meeting people pays the best dividends in life.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

[off topic]

There's at least one store I know of in New York City that's been making money off of doing VCR repairs for decades. A lot of companies invested in big video displays back in the day and it would cost far more to replace everything than it does to keep the antique tech going.

Some people are still learning Cobol.

https://www.cio.com/article/240709/why-its-time-to-learn-cobol.html

If you can find a niche tech like that it would make sense.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The green curve would be higher that the red one everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

There is a brief inversion at high salary values where CEOs exist

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Nassim Nicholas Taleb talks about this when he explains his own career. He realized the amount of effort he had in him was never going to change, so he wanted a field where earnings weren't limited by his own effort - the dream of passive income. He became an expert on risk and a well known writer. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nassim_Nicholas_Taleb

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Good recommendation.

Nassim Nicholas Taleb also has a bunch of useful writing on taking risks that applies very well to financial choices like investments and career choice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

This is my take on it. That unexpected spike in the salary is slightly skewed stats from the billionaires with all the money and none of the knowledge.

Then it goes back down to nearly 0 where most of our average wages actually are.

Source: My source is that I made it the fuck up, but it's certainly what it feels like when you see the clueless assholes with money and power.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

You don't promote good workers, the job description changes with promotion so the previously good worker might not be (as) good anymore.

Good workers with lots of expertise and know-how get more work.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 weeks ago

After many careers and much money earned and spent, I now try to go by „ikigai“. Its a japanese theory and teaches you to be aware of what it is that you want, what makes you money, what the world needs and what you‘re good at, basically. This is how I went from a very well paid but soul sucking job to a lesser paid but much more fulfilling work.

For me it was building computers and the stuff around it. Its fun and it makes decent money if done right.

Good luck!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Become self-employed, don't charge by time but delivered projects/products.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think there's a strong relation between knowledge and salary. It's more likely demand and supply - if specific skills are in demand, and not many people have them, then pay will increase. And at the highest levels it's often not what you know, but who you know that matters.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Get into politics.

Replace "expert knowledge" with "knowledge about how to manipulate people to vote for you"

Take bribes. Listens to whats your puppet-masters tell you to vote.

Ez money.

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Is there a field where that red curve is flipped so that each extra aquired unit of expertise earns you exponentially more money?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Corrupt politician.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

It's hard to overstate how much money "2-3x what a run of the mill job makes" is over the course of a lifetime. I guess to you right now it doesn't seem like much, but someone who makes three times more money than someone else is significantly more well off. There aren't any wage jobs that are going to net you exponential salary growth. Your only hope there is to strike gold and found PayPal or Microsoft or something.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

This is very true

Some people fall into the lifestyle creep trap and get accustomed to spending what they make. If you make 2x average and live relatively normally you’ll find your savings grow quick.

Even if you do make good money, it’s best not to let that go to your head.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

To build on your comment: cost of living has a surprisingly fixed price. Different qualities of living don’t cost massively different. If the average person has to spend their whole earnings on living an “average life”, if you make 2x and want to live twice as nice of a life, it likely only cost 1.5x the “average life”. Earning 2-3x opens up a lot of luxury even though it may not seem like it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Trades. If you are a plumber or an auto mechanic you can make a killing. Doubly so if you own the business. If I had it to do over again I would get a business degree and then become an electrician.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Sales. No joke — the knowledge you need has a hard cap (the product line) but sales is commonly the highest-paid entry level employee (as long as you hit commission).

Now add a line in here for “effort” flattening out over time and that’s what I wanna see.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Con man? CEO? Hedge fund manager?

But seriously, generally anything having an exponential return in this world is pretty unusual and generally not guaranteed if it's a desirable outcome.

Particularly in a capitalist economy, the business only has to pay you just enough to not leave for a competitor, they don't need to pay you the true value of your ability unless you're basically the only person on the planet with the necessary skills.

On the flip side, in booming industries that require specific skills such as tech, you can generally get a pretty linear progression for a while before it plateaus in a good number of organisations.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

bullshitting other people

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Continuing to work for the same company will only provide +2% to +4% per year regardless of knowledge gained. You aren't paid for how much you know.

To get the large gains in income, you have to re-set your salary by changing jobs, at which point you get one big bump, then go back to +2% to +4% per year.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Not true for everyone. My pay rises over the past 5 years were around 35% on top of my starting wage, specifically linked to how much knowledge or experience I have gained in the role.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

In curious where you are in the career curve?

When I started I had similar experience where I was rapidly getting promoted and raises. Eventually that slowed down.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Well, that's great for you! Definitely not the norm though!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

To be honest, when you continue to work for the same company, your knowledge will also only grow by +2% to +4% per year.
You'll be the go-to guy for a number of things, all of which you've done a thousand times. Doing something else will decrease the team's efficiency, cause someone else is the go-to guy with the expert knowledge on that.
And you only work within the context of your company, without getting exposed to how other companies do things.

It takes a certain soft skill to break out of one setting and hit the ground running somewhere else, which most don't have. And after you switch, you bring a valuable outside view into whatever company you enter. That's part of the reason you can demand more at a new workplace.

Staying for a long time in one place also offers comfort and familiarity, which have value for people, especially with families.
Employers need to pay more to make up for that loss in "value".

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

When Epic started hiring every software engineer in video games they flipped that red curve, at least to the right of that blue line.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

Manipulativeness

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›