Just coexist with (super)natural horrors, they are not that bad once you get used to them, def not as bad as humans.
That's is why they are more afraid of you than you are of them, humans can and will outclass any horror beyond our comprehension, like for fun or sport.
I def use them after 3 weeks (prob 5 if bought fresh), but always do the floaty & smelly tests (bcs I'm picky, not bcs of Ella salmon).
I was curious, it seems we have a prevalence goal of about 2% (which is achieved/maintained, but a bit less than two decades ago something changed & caused a spike). US follows the cases reported via health organisations and the human results are about the same.
From 1 January 2008, all Member States with Salmonella prevalence above 10% will have to vaccinate their laying hens against Salmonella, in order to reduce the spread of the disease and the contamination of eggs. The vaccinations used must be authorised at EU level, and must be distinguishable from the field bacteria during sampling and testing. National authorities may exempt a holding from this vaccination requirement provided satisfactory preventive measures are being applied or there has been no incidence of Salmonella on the holding over the previous 12 months.
Why just dont take better care of chickens in the first place?
(We all know there is enough profit to allow that & much more.)
Bcs your laws says you don't have to?
I remember how much political pressure there was on EU to lower our standards & allow poultry imports from USA on the cheap.
Well... now what?
Years went by and Earth-destroying profits continued for all these years, again.
The goal was well defined, misinformation carefully funded, the results what they hoped for.
Wimdy.
But the least wimdy going forward.
We gonna achieve such terrifying new records in just years!
Bcs they act as a monopoly in regards to alternatives.
They only slightly intend to compete against each other but pretend nothing else exist (pirates, or people just shifting towards other forms of entertainment).
And they are ofc in cahoots in the sense that their common goal is to normalise paying several hundred moneys per month for streaming services and have the streaming service full of ads regardless.
So in that sense they will not compete but back each other up.
Like land owners/landlords, their main goals are completely aligned.
And that is how 'market disruptions' actually work - its not to offer a new service to the end user (like Uber-ish services are the same as taxi services from the perspective of users), it's to undercut the existing regime with lower prices whilst living on capital given because of the promise that once the old regime is gone they can crank up the prices & actually profitable (we are actually just at this stage right now - watch how much monthly fees are gonna go up in just a few years).
Goal/end stage:
Users are gonna be glued to their ad-ridden TVs just the same as boomers but far better monetised (watching TV is gonna be expensive).
Stupid sexy Titi Villus, don't tempt my spell ing.
I do both and I'm not.
(Not 'not the same', Im just not, I doubt my existence, especially when thoughts get inherent)
Imagine knowing that and not just joining them
It's just jealous that it needs the other meat parts to do a spooky dooky
... someone linked this in a Discord server and it's just too horrible not to repost.
Would have turned the switches the other way around tho.
I wasn't confused until you pointed out this isn't what they meant.
Are there cat-girl women who like younger men living in rural areas?
No need to answer, I'm moving, let me get surprised.