Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
How often do these vote cycles occur? I would argue that most distuptive changes will make things worse before they change to the better.
Ending capitalism, forgiving all debt etc. will lead to huge chaos in the short and medium term. Even thought in the long term, it might turn into a much better system, you'd need a lot of time to rebuild society and people to see the positive in it.
I think that's also an issue of today's democracies. If you're elected, you have just a relatively short period of time before the next election. If you aim for big reforms, you might be still in the 'make things worse' phase after the first legislation period and people will vote for an opposing party. They undo everything you did, again making things worse without ever achieving their own vision.
Basically, in this hypothetical, people jusr submit a "approve" or "disapprove" via their brain implant, and it gets instantly gets counted (for "plot magic" reasons okay). Once submitted, it remains that way until the person change it. It can be changed any time.
Example: In the morning, they see news of you giving out money to everyone, check their bank and voila money, they are happy and they vote "Approve". In the afternoon, they get news report of you are helping minorities, and oopsie the same person is also a racist and didn't like that you are helping the minorites which they hate, so they change it to "Disapprove". People could also set it to automatically change to "Disapprove" upon death in order to disincentivise you ordering their execution. If they never summitted any votes, and they die, its also a "Disapprove".
TLDR: There are no "election cycles" you are constantly being judged.
Then, I think your best chances of survival would be being as invisible as possible. Only react to urgent issues, don't address systematic issues and if you're forced to give a statement, remain vague and unclear. It's not great for society in the longterm but I think any disruptive change will make people confused, annoyed, insecure or angry. Even though they get used to the change quickly or even like it, instant voting will be your death sentence.
Another strategy may be to distract people from issues. Sport events, drugs, parties, censorship. Keep up the illusion of everything going well while the world goes down the drain.
Literally the whole process the US just endured. (And has been enduring, and will probably continue to endure) (Please help)