GoodLuckToFriends

joined 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

It's not always about the cost saving. Sometimes it's just because it gets more customers! Brominated flour, as an example.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Spaghetti with a little butter melted on it.

You know the saddest part? My family wasn't 'poor.' My father just wouldn't give my mother money for groceries, and shopping for food was a woman's job. I don't know how we, or she, made it through until the divorce.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Already did! They can't ban my blood from helping others now, can they!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

uberautism, thank you very much. You've got to use fancy foreign words to make your mark, don't ya know¿

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lol, he's right. I got measles, or... at least, an attenuated version from the FFUKCING MMR VVAccine, you dolt!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I wish I could be that popular, but I'd end up talking to the folks on the wall as I debate firework integrity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Sory.

Edit: Sorry

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Great, now I'm on another list, but it's not a cool one like "Most dangerous average person list."

It's more like, "People who cracked up watching a trump analogue wear a bronzed putin-bull's testicles.'

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

I mean, I feel the same way about character deaths. It's an overused trope. Let's have them quietly working in the background, like a capable spy would, eh? I think comics should have long ago embraced having their superheroes 'retire' by simply being background mentions from time to time, rather than have big dramatic deaths and torch passing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I agree with you, but it will never happen without legislation forcing it. The insurance companies don't care who the money comes from (for the most part), so take them out of the equation. The person purchasing the car will (rightfully) feel that they shouldn't have liability because they're not driving the car, but the manufacturer/dealer will also (rightfully) feel that they can't control the environment that the owner subjects the car to, so the liability should be on the purchaser.

Right now, if you don't maintain your tires, and you lose traction and cause a wreck, you're at fault. If you don't maintain your brakes and they fail and you slam into the back of another car, you're at fault. Repeat ad nauseam for every part of the car.

Unless everything becomes leased (oh god, I can hear the comments about 'you will own nothing, and you will be happy' coming) and the manufacturer/dealer can force inspection of the car every x00 miles at the purchaser's expense, they will happily (and successfully, because they'll definitely sway the majority of american idiots with their 'dire warnings' about giving up ownership of your vehicle) that they shouldn't be liable because they can't ensure owners don't set up a dangerous situation.

I also don't see them 'grounding' a vehicle because a sensor says something is wrong. That is just screaming as the bad PR looms for the companies that would spearhead that thrust.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I call them circle spawners. The enemies spawn in a rough circle around you and close in. I think you can modify that with other terms depending on the specifics of what the game adds in.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

One of the scripts running on that page is squarespace, so I wonder if the artist just grabbed a preconfigured 'blog' style.

view more: ‹ prev next ›