The more things he throws tantrums about, the bigger the change he will get a nice and friendly aneurism.
this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
232 points (97.2% liked)
politics
19072 readers
3802 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I hope he celebrates with a Big Mac feast and a nice lard milkshake
... and then promptly shits his pants, again.
The answer to everything Trump ever says is 'prove it'.
At this point, Trump throwing tantrums is kinda just assumed. It's hardly news...
Although I have to admit the move to monitor the monitor is hilarious.
"We'll have our own monitor! With blackjack and hookers!"
Edit: damn it, someone already made this joke! I'm leaving it.
What if someone tries to monitor our monitor?
We're going to monitor his monitor monitor!
And if they have a monitor monitor monitor?
That's why I've got this monitor monitor monitor monitor!
Trump is going to die destitute & in state custody.
We can only hope to dream. The oligarchy often works to preserve its members so who fucking knows...
Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter
The sooner the better.
the Trumps responded over the weekend by tasking their own accountant as a monitor that monitors the court monitor.
"I'm going to have my own monitor! With blackjack and hookers!"
Damn it! You beat me to it!
I guess they had to get another accountant since the last one went to prison & is barred from working in finances.
Repurposing discredited monitors.
But that too might fail to convince the judge, because it came from Jason Flemmons, a CPA who lost credibility when testifying at the recent bank fraud trial. Justice Engoron tore into the accountant last month, noting how Flemmons had “inexplicably” contradicted himself several times and seemed willing to bend over backwards to appease the Trumps. Engoron was annoyed at how Flemmons kept providing cover for the Trump family, like when he asserted that basic accounting principles require that an asset’s present value reflect discounted future income—but refusing to admit the Trumps broke the rules when they failed to do that.
He tried blackjack already. Poor guy couldn't figure out how to keep multiple casinos, an industry known for basically printing money, afloat. Truly baffling considering what a genius businessman he is.
Turns out you can't launder money & profit from a casino at the same time.
Which is an amazing achievement for Trump, as usually the issue with trying to launder money through a business is that it looks TOO profitable.
He couldn't - utter abject failure loser.
Laundering is integral to casinos profits.
🤣