"unless they vote Democrat"
this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
179 points (96.4% liked)
politics
19097 readers
2942 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The US constantly makes everything illegal, then picks and chooses what it wants to prosecute for whom and when. It means you're never safe. You can always be arrested or have your life ruined depending on the mood of the police, agents, and DA at various moments in time.
And these moods and choices vary greatly depending on your socioeconomic status and skin colour to name a couple things.
It's a disgusting practice. Write better laws if you don't mean it.
Yup, it's the Russian-era autocratic way. Nominally be a society of laws, but the laws are so rigid and unfair that everyone breaks them, which gives cover for political will to entirely decide who goes to jail.
It doesn't matter what he says now. He lacks the legal authority to grant pardons or indemnity or whatever. And prosecotors lie, especially for political gain.
Florida and Georgia and I'm sure other states have already put forward legislation that can punish prosecutors for not prosecuting crimes. Really these are thin veils to give legal justification to remove prosecutors who are viewed as liberal. As I see it, removal of elected officials unilaterally is voter suppression and should not be allowed.
Ahhh, so it's not actually about protecting the lives of the unborn then? These embryos are not biologically different than the natural ones from a pregnancy, yet they get different treatment.
Pretty sure the ruling outlasts his tenure, next guy won't give the same slack.
he's lying, we all know what. don't give the benefit of the doubt
Yea, but his fingers are crossed, so......
Oh heck. I knew we should’ve made him pinky promise.
This mother lover would probably cross his toes.
....yet
What a kind and benevolent overlord who won't punish his subjects this time.
When the laws have gotten so bad, the only sane option is to just not enforce them.
when the laws have gotten so bad, that the a nutjob AG who's totally down for enforcing other forms of abortion bullshit; is saying it's too crazy to enforce.
He's saving it for a rainy day when he needs leverage over someone dealing with infertility.
}set foxworthy -on
If yer Attorney General is saying “I swear I won’t enforce the law - it’s just too crazy!” . . . Yuh just might be a redneck
[x] Doubt
Your Supreme Court says they're children, and you're pre-emptively saying you're not going to prosecute crimes against children? For shame.
Well, well, well. If it isn't the consequences of my actions...
Wait, so fertilized eggs in a uterus are living beings with souls and should be protected all costs (up to executing women who seek abortions) yet eggs fertilized in a petri dish are just discardable medical waste? We're up to "God has to blow the breath of life right up a woman's vagina or else it doesn't count"?
As the saying goes, if it weren't for double standards Republicans wouldn't have any standards at all.
Dang. God got it easy. I usually gotta be down there doing a whole lot more for a lot longer
God has to blow the breath of life right up a woman’s vagina ...
Good work if you can get it.
Safety tip, do not let anyone blow air up your vagina, even if they say they are God!! That's how you get a pulmonary embolism. Or immaculate conception.
Selectively enforcing laws is unjust and discriminatory. It's why it took so long to get gay marriage on the books. Pigs and prosecutors would only target poorer people and those who couldn't defend themselves and cherry pick cases unlikely to win on appeal.
This is being used so Alabama shitheels like Steve Marshall can persecute through prosecution all the people he doesn't like while letting his buddies off. All laws should apply to all people equally.
I wish I could buy Fediverse Plutonium for this comment.
Thanks :)
I liked the old reddit silver where it was that simply drawn medal.
Also, if he doesn't prosecute anyone for it, then it nobody has standing to challenge it.
I would still encourage the people of Alabama to be highly skeptical of any assurances made by these Republicans in the state. Their word is worthless.
Bold of you to think they can read.
At a minimum, it's dependent on who's in office: if they have the info, someone else can come into office and charge you until the statute of limitations expire. And if they decide it's murder, the statute never expires.
😉 (probably)
For now...
Even if he follows through on not prosecuting, there is always going to be a new Attorney General at some point who decides to prosecute.
He will totally prosecute though.
Depends on skin color.