this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
758 points (98.5% liked)

News

23634 readers
2432 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

I'm glad they're afraid.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

— “You’re never stopping anyone who wants to get to you.”

All my life I've tried to make sure people don't want to kill me and I'm still alive, it seems like a winning strategy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 week ago (9 children)

The disconnect between public perception and personal humanity has been striking, with some commentary bordering on dehumanizing.

Yeah it's a lot easier to humanize someone who makes six figures than someone who makes seven. Why don't you start there?

Or maybe just make it so the CEO doesn't make 700x more than the lowest paid worker. You don't even have to reduce the CEO pay to do it! Just lift up those other people.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Also, as if many CEO's and upper managements humanize their customers and not see them as numbers in a spreadsheet.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

I'm positively giddy

[–] [email protected] 268 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (17 children)

People are in disbelief that they would be making this kid into a hero,” he told Fortune.

Attending a conference for CEOs in New York this week, just blocks away from the site of the shooting, George found that many were shaken and deeply concerned by the reaction to Thompson’s killing. “They’re having plenty of meetings right now to discuss beefing up security,” he said of the business leaders, even as some question how much security coverage is enough. People are asking themselves, “‘What does that say about our society? Where’s our society going?’” George said.

So they've learned absolutely nothing.

Plenty of meetings to beef up security. How about plenty of meetings to understand how your greed has caused this? They sound one logical leap (that they are unwilling to make) away from understanding exactly what the problem is.

They managed to find one and only one CEO quote that reflected anything resembling self-awareness.

“When I was growing up, CEOs didn’t make millions more than everyone else in the company. I think we have to reflect on why there’s so much anger and do something about it.”

[–] [email protected] 167 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

All I can think of is a TED talk I saw where the speaker had given some presentation to a bunch of billionaires and had some q&a, and one of them who had built a bunker for themselves asked him how they could prevent their security team from turning on them in the bunker.

The TED talk guy responded "Be kind to them?"

And the Billionaire said "But where does that end?"

I'll try to find it so I can link it.

EDIT: Found it!

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don't think it was a ted talk, I'm pretty sure it was a seminar put on specifically by the billionaire class asking this guy how best to navigate societal collapse with their vast amount of resources.

This I believe was one of the exchanges at that event.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’ll try to find it so I can link it.

Oh god please do.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I managed to find what I was thinking of, but it concludes with a totally different line about them than I remembered. I think @[email protected] is right, and the "where does that end?" quote might be from a segment in a Robert Evans podcast.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure it was the same guy who did the “it could happen here podcast.” Then they were like, can we put shock collars on the security guards. Stuff like that.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago

Robert Evans? The man is a national treasure.

If you haven't heard his miniseries "Behind the Police" (ironically a four episode special in a much longer running serial podcast called "Behind the Bastards" which is not only about police) I strongly recommend it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Because CEOs are a symptom.

The problem is our investment economy that focuses only on the stock prices continually going up. It's literally an unsustainable system.

If a CEO puts their personal safety over the investors, the company gets a new CEO.

They're not the one really making the worst decisions, they're the ones who agreed to take a shitton of money to be the face of the company and take all the blame.

CEOs don't get paid for the work they do, they get paid to be the fall guy.

Still absolutely shit people who deserve zero sympathy, but they're not the real problem, just a symptom

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The problem is our investment economy that focuses only on the stock prices continually going up. It's literally an unsustainable system.

Yup, this is the problem right here. Investments are supposed to generate returns, that's the whole point. But Milton Friedman and Jack Welch decided that the sole mission of any company was to increase shareholder value, and the rest of the world rolled with that. So whenever these CEOs point to their Mission and Vision statements, unless they say "Our only priority is delivering returns to our Shareholders", they are lying.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shareholder_value

Economist Milton Friedman introduced the Friedman doctrine in a 1970 essay for The New York Times, entitled "A Friedman Doctrine: The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits".[5] In it, he argued that a company has no social responsibility to the public or society; its only responsibility is to its shareholders.[6]

Meanwhile, we've decided that these corporations are people. Psychopaths who have no moral responsibilities to anyone but their shareholders, but people nonetheless.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I don't always agree with what you post, but you're spot on here.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If a CEO puts their personal safety over the investors, the company gets a new CEO.

How many times will they be willing to get a new CEO before they make changes? How many times will someone accept promotion into that position? I wouldn't take Brian Thompson's job for any amount of money right now, would you?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How many times will they be willing to get a new CEO before they make changes

They'd do it on the daily if it makes them more money...

What do you think a CEO actually does?

They listen to what high level management says is best, and then just does whatever brings the stock price up fastet disregarding everything else.

There's a reason they all get golden parachutes. None of them care past the last board meeting

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (6 children)

How many times will someone accept promotion into that position? I wouldn’t take Brian Thompson’s job for any amount of money right now, would you?

I absolutely would take the job. I'd do it for a $1 salary even. I would have the power to make sure claims were approved, lower premiums on users, and call out the inequity of private healthcare from the top of the ivory tower. I'd be fired, but not before I was able to make some good happen.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

And, in the long term, that wouldn't even be bad for line go up.

Companies used to invest in their reputation, back when there was that 90% marginal income tax rate.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

That's the thing, you wouldn't have the power to do any of that before you were booted out. CEOs do have a lot of power over the board, and the board has power over the company. The net result is that if the CEO pushes too fast or too radically they get removed before any change occurs. As the poster above said, in situations like this the CEO is paid to be the fall guy; the people who wield the actual power are the board members and the large shareholders. The CEO deserves a chunk of the blame for being the face of the organisation and legitimizing it, but killing one, or even a few, off wont significantly change the direction these companies are headed in.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fair, but in the context of a company being willing to just replace CEOs every time they have to fire one (or especially when someone shows up to fire the CEO for them, Luigi-style), I think there's a small number of cycles they would go through before logic would dictate that they need to conduct business differently.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a bridge too far for them, especially with particularly oligarch friendly policies of the incoming US administration.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

“When I was growing up, CEOs didn’t make millions more than everyone else in the company. I think we have to reflect on why there’s so much anger and do something about it.”

Only one of the 11 anonymous CEO responses gets it. There's constant brainwashing in America (fortune.com is a literally part of it), that wealthy people made good decisions and were smart so they deserve every penny they make off the backs of everyone else.

This ruse might work in an economy of the past with fairer tax rules, better social mobility (for cis white males at the time), and industries where the consumer-company relationship aren't counter to each other. With healthcare, it is plainly obvious that the money going to the executive is from people dying and sick people being denied care, forced into debt and bankruptcy, exploited for this product with extremely inelastic demand. Every minute they waste of your time keeping you away from your treatment is more dollars to them. That's why people are upset at United, and aren't upset about CEOs of these types of industries being murdered.

The country's residents' health should not be a commodity to be sold.

[–] [email protected] 103 points 1 week ago (1 children)

United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson was fatally shot on Dec. 4, 2024. The public response was generally not sympathetic.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The public response was generally not sympathetic.

The words they use are an attempt to weaken the impact of the hit. The public response wasn't sympathetic, it was generally celebratory.

The elite cannot fathom being anything other than better than those below them. Deserving. They "got theirs."

Maybe it was the significant amount of lead in the atmosphere for a long time that caused widespread brain damage, but it's so obvious how disconnected from reality they are. Thompson's death highlighted that reality applies to them too, and they can't handle it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Awww poor billionaires. So sad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 143 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Here’s an idea, make human life more important than line go up. I’m pretty sure that would get alllllll of your asses off the firing line.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

But my capitalism!

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Okay but what if we just sent everyone some stickers with our logo on it?

I mean EVERYBODY loves stickers. Then w we can keep making money, you can keep dying and you’ll have some great bling for your toddlers coffin!

Everybody wins!

Think of how few stickers are on the average toddler’s coffin?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

I was thinking pizza party myself, all our employees (except the ones we fired for being negative nancies) love pizza parties.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What if the line going up wasn't money, but the value of human life? 🤔

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

We measure what we treasure!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›