Compound suggests multiple buildings
ArbiterXero
joined 1 year ago
These answers read like idiocracy…
“He felt like he cared because he was an outsider”
I’m just waiting for “She talked all faggy-like”
“Ow my balls”
“He really spoke to me, and her professional speak made me feel dumb”
Fair. Still isn’t remotely news worthy.
But why publish it? Who cares?
Damnit, I knew I was fucking up the bit
I’m deeply confused as to why they have any statement…
And why they think the US is sexist
And why they seem to selectively think sexism is bad while denying women education
And why this is news or worthy of print.
And for gods sakes won’t someone tell me what Ja rule thinks of this?????
Yes, I think you misunderstood what I meant, I think we’re saying the same thing.
They both are “manipulatively reading the rules” to make the rules seem say something that gives them more power than they have and zero responsibility to their neighbour, city, state or country
Same basic principle of “things mean what I want them to mean”
They’re all trying to do an end-run around democracy and society, it’s just a different level of power they believe they have.
Sov cits want it for themselves
These sheriffs want it for elections.
More dangerous, sure, but the same basic principle of “I can manipulatively read and misunderstand the rules so that they don’t apply to me”
They honestly sound like those sovereign citizens crap
The social media firms are the ones scraping the data.
They only add protections to make sure they get paid for it.
Hey, falling out of high windows is a very natural and common death!
It has nothing to do with ANYTHING else. You understand that, right comrade?
…. RIGHT?
view more: next ›
….. while not understanding the percentiles they gave you on the online IQ test.