The fact that there aren't riots in the US demanding universal care simply baffles me.
this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
677 points (99.7% liked)
Not The Onion
12561 readers
271 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Who needs roots when killing CEOs is more effective?
Is it effective though? I mean, it's fun, but I don't see it actually improving the situation.
Well, this decision just got reversed, so I'd say it does at least a bit
It's not a one time solution, it's a lifestyle change. You have to keep doing it.
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield said in a statement that its decision to backpedal resulted from “significant widespread misinformation” about the policy.
Ah, yes, if people complain about being mistreated, it is always "Our plan was misunderstood", or "The critique is based on misinformation"...
I would find it darkly hilarious if this killing sparks a war
I would find it hilarious if it sparks class solidarity, personally
That's right. Rush the surgeons. That will end well.
It was already reversed.
We got them scared
usually when a thing is reversed due to outrage, the entity will simply wait a few months to quietly put said thing into effect again
Didn't verify, but someone said it was only reversed in like one out of the five proposed states. Figures
They should be.
I propose a guillotine emoji.
🧑🌾
This is fucking insane
That's a nice CEO you got there. Be a shame if something happened to them.
Or would it
Insurance pays out until outcome and not treatment. Meaning of they don't cure you, insurance will have to cover until you die.
And if they kill you while trying to cure you, every care provider in the chain pays 10-times the cost (total insurance paid by patient over all the years) based on liability to the family else insurance pays 20-times total insurance cost to family.
and for Connecticut providers
Anybody from Connecticut care to respond. Why is your state so special?
From a more recent article where Anthem now says they won’t implement this policy:
Connecticut comptroller Sean Scanlon said the “concerning” policy wouldn’t affect the state after conversations with the insurance company. And New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said in an emailed statement Thursday that her office had also successfully intervened.
Don’t they have the closest thing to universal healthcare in the US?
Of course, because in the USA, insurance companies think they understand medicine better than doctors.
And so do Politicians and Parents..
How did they figure out the amount because the different people have different tolerances. My brother had a surgery that had not started and they were like. Your still awake. When meeting with the anethsiaologist before surgery he has to mention he may need a bit more than normal plus I believe there is a weight thing. Is the amount allowed assuming a worst case longest surgery with person who requires the most anesthia to six sigma of the population.
Exactly, like how redheads need more anesthesia
Real answer? Who knows
Cynical answer? However low their lawyers told them they could get away with without being liable
I remember some jokes around it being about cell receptiveness. Like their receptors don't react to taking pigment the same way they don't react to the anesthesia as well. If so, it would likely be a genetic trait, so the more natural red heads that have extremely low pigment may require more anesthesia to keep them under. But I'm no doctor, and most of those jokes had to do with their soul not being around to pick up the call 🤷.
So, at the absolute most charitable interpretation, this punishes patients for having a slow surgical staff or for a surgery having complications. Like most insurance things, punishing the patient for shit completely outside of their control.
On top of this, best outcome of this (for doctors to try and ensure their patients don't need to decide between potential financial ruin or surgery) would be for all surgical departments to wildly inflate their surgery times so they can't ever be over estimate. This will significantly reduce the amount of surgeries able to be completed per day, and hike up the price even more as they have to bill for more time.
The only possible justification for this is attempting to find another place to lower financial costs to the insurance company at any "cost". I miss when these people had enough shame to not go this mask off.
This actually sets a time limit for anesthesia regardless of procedure or estimated time from the doctors.
It's entirely up to the insurance company to set an arbitrary time with which they think medical care should be provided within and deny past.
It's nothing but appalling cruelness for the sake of it, and a few extra dollars for a CEO and board of Directors that deserve the opposite of health care.
view more: next ›