this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
254 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2704 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

How do we gum up the works?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

I'm past the point of caring, let the bread and circus commence. The American public, it seems, must learn shit the hard way.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 hours ago (20 children)

The guy who couldn't build A WALL is going to orchestrate a mass deportation on millions and millions of people? Ok. Lol. Also, what happens when fruit/vegetables start to rot on the vine because they don't have anyone who will take their shit wages to do it.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

Everything will be a national emergency to pass any and everything they want to.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 106 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Bracing for "Wait, I didn't think you meant me?!?!?"

[–] [email protected] 59 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

"Cool, a leopard! Can I pet it?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Saw this one coming. He'll do the same to justify ending elections.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

100% this is a trial for emergency actions to end elections.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (8 children)

There are not enough ICE officers to conduct mass deportation in red states, let alone blue ones. Trump will require cooperation of local police.

If he uses the military in Blue states, it's an obvious attack on the 10th Amendment. It's also illegal to use the military for domestic police work.

We can bet on incompetence for now. Trump needs to grow ICE to a large size before he's even able to conduct a large scale deportation plan of any kind. Deploying the National Guard would be a faux pas, but that's probably the workaround else need to prepare for legally.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 hours ago

Stoking a violent insurrection while plotting a coup violated a few laws and norms, too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

A couple federal judges have opined that he can declare an invasion on US land. This unlocks a lot of powers for him if they interpret the laws in their favor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (9 children)

You say that. But the minute people's private homes get invaded by US Troops, US citizen's opinions will immediately change.

Republicans are strongly pro-4th Amendment and are distrustful of the police as well. Getting wrapped up in police raids just because you live in the wrong neighborhood will piss off a LOT of Republicans. And a mass program that forces citizens to ICE / Police / Military into your house (be it a massive push for warrants, or some other mass-scale law) would be a significant number of breaks with the Constitution.

Remember: the Republicans are "Deep State" fuckers who distrust federal officials. Do you really think they'd be cool with orders that let police into their private homes?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

Trump will require cooperation of local police.

Plenty of pigs are already on his side, and would help him with this willingly.

Also, as president, SCOTUS has already ruled that he can pretty much do what he wants as long as it's an "official" act.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Plenty of pigs are already on his side, and would help him with this willingly.

In some red states, yes. But that's largely in rural areas. I'm not sure if even a city in a deep-red state like Houston would cooperate with Trump.

Its not up to the Police in any case. It'd be likely up to the local Attorney's General.

Also, as president, SCOTUS has already ruled that he can pretty much do what he wants as long as it’s an “official” act.

If Trump wants to personally come down and deport Mexicans one by one, I'd love to see it. But otherwise, Trump is going to write a thing that likely won't make sense. Local police won't get any money for immigration issues and will complain about funding and long hours. Then all the shit will collapse unless Congress gives more money for a deportation program.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 71 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Oh no, its illegal to use the military for domestic police work? Deploying the National Guard would be a "faux pas"?

Well, I'm sure that will stop him for sure!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (3 children)

Its the next political bulwark and where we rally next. If Trump runs over that bulwark, then we make plans afterwards.

But the Military will NOT want to be seen going house-to-house deporting Puerto Rican American Citizens. I know there's a lot of racists out there, but if they do that, we just take some pictures and the national level outrage and blatant racism on the troop's faces will be shown for everyone. And trust me, if a mass deportation order were invoked, 100% legal US Citizens will be swept up in the blatantly racist attack.

These people cannot tell the difference from an illegal Mexican, a legal Haitian or a US Citizen Puerto Rican. I'm serious. So that's no longer a Trump-specific thing at that point. That's commanders and soldiers who will have to live with that for the rest of their lives.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

the national level outrage and blatant racism on the troop’s faces will be shown for everyone

And what will anyone be able to do about it? That's the problem with installing a fascist autocracy. Outrage does not deter fascists. The left needs to organize and be prepared to physically obstruct these actions, and that is not going to be without danger.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (8 children)

And what will anyone be able to do about it?

We tie it to deep state federal officials invading private US Homes. And then Republican support collapses over the events.

Speak the language of the Republicans and they'll agree with you on this. Invading private homes with US Troops, looking for contraban (ie: illegal immigrants in this case) with mass warrants would be uncomfortable to even Republicans in these areas.


If Republicans really are cool with this then whatever. Onto the next bulwark. But we need to prepare our arguments and discussion points. But we will work to defend our political rights at each stage of this process as Trump tries to do random bullshit.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That's commanders and soldiers who will have to live with that for the rest of their lives.

If the second Bush era taught us anything, it's that there's plenty of soldiers willing to live with things for the rest of their lives.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (7 children)

This is a border patrol agent invading a Miami Home to take that small boy on the right (Elian Gonzalez) back to Cuba.

This was a defining moment of the 1990s. What happened here was a Cuban family had a claim on Elian Gonzalez, meaning not only was he an illegal alien, arguably the US-side of the Family was kidnapping him. Gonzalez's father (Cuban side) pushed heavily for US to get Elian back. Ultimately, Clinton agreed with the Father and used deportation agents to capture the child and bring him back to Cuba (effectively deporting him).

Nonetheless, armed troops invading a Miami private home caused a national-level outrage event. Even though it was a 100% illegal alien with a 100% legitimate claim to be deported (ie: be reunited with his Father).


The stories of what will transpire here under Trump will be far more horrific and less gray. They will likely include US Citizens who forgot to hold onto a Driver's License and suddenly are disappeared (especially if he uses untrained dumbasses like US Military, composed largely of 18 year olds who were too dumb to go to college).

We can rely upon the outrage that will occur, but only if we document and take pictures of the horror. The focus needs to be on documenting the horrors as the next step. In any case, no reasonable troop will want to be seen as the man on the left, and no commander will want to be the one to sign their name okaying something like this again.


That also ignores 4th Amendment issues and court cases. How many homes and warrants are they going to issue? Just fucking everyone in a neighborhood? Like how do you actually make this work?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Hell override the posse comatatus act and use federal military troops.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

If it gets that far, and I'm not convinced it will, Troops aren't trained for immigration issues.

Do you think 18 year old dumbass Privates and Corporals know the difference between a Puerto Rican US Citizen and an illegal Mexican? Do you think US Troops have any training on police actions? Lawyers or courts?

That's a disaster waiting to happen. We use troops rarely because they're dumbasses with a gun. We give them exceptional fighting training, but no training on finer details of policing. Use of force will be too high, rights will be trampled, US Citizens will 100% get caught up as military has no fucking training on this subject.

If it gets that far, then we know what to do. Take pictures, document, build national level outrage.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

Every single bad thing about this country, from now on, will be prepended with "Biden"

It shall be law.

I'm not actually sure if I'm joking.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

It was weird to watch donvict try to make that a thing in near real time, with "Bidenflation" and "Bigration" or some such shit. This stuff works on the clapping seals that make up his base, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Right. Let's not blame Trump or the electorate that put him in power.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Next up: arson attack on US Congress. And then the Enabling Act.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Didn’t the Canadian burn the Whitehouse down once or something?

[–] [email protected] 50 points 7 hours ago (7 children)

Twice.

Don't make us come down there a third time, I swear to Gord.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

Hypothetically, what would trigger you guys? Just asking questions...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

It usually takes a Canadian Bacon moment where the US actually tries to take part of our sovereign territory by force.

Of course, that’s assuming Trump doesn’t get his wish and Pollievre becomes PM. Because in that case, we’ll likely be too busy fighting our own fascist battles up here to even respond.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, I'm not seeing a downside here.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 hours ago

Canadians conservatives burnt down their own parliament too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

"prepared to declare a national emergency and will use military assets to reverse the Biden invasion through a mass deportation program."

  • Trump reposted Fitton's comment Monday with the caption, "TRUE!!"

I don’t even know what to say. I’m gobsmacked to depression daily that you’re ok with this.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

But Obama wore a tan suit!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago

Where were you when America was violated by the terrorist fist jab?

Also, I will never forget how Michelle Obama sullied this country with her bare arms....

[–] [email protected] 64 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

But EGG PRICES! The economy!

And he's such a strong leader...

(I am paraphrasing actual interviews our local networks did with college students)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I think we need to start using strongman in conversation more for the people who don't know what it means.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 hours ago

I'm afraid it would just bolster his image. Become a tiktok meme or something...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 7 hours ago

Hey, the democratic party wasn't close enough to the workers so there was no alternative..

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›