this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
334 points (99.7% liked)

News

23284 readers
3727 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Vivek Ramaswamy, recently appointed to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has proposed defunding federal programs that lack current congressional authorization.

This could affect programs like veterans’ healthcare, NASA, and early education initiatives, which still receive funding despite expired authorizations.

Ramaswamy argues that cutting these programs could save billions, and he’s committed to targeting expenditures that “don’t advance the interests of American citizens.”

DOGE, co-led by Elon Musk, aims to curb government spending, with Musk estimating potential cuts of up to $2 trillion.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 41 minutes ago

Save billions on essentials while spending trillions in bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 hour ago

Remember when if you didn't "support our troops," Republicans would ask you why you hated America?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

Not for millenia would I have realized that Department of Government Efficiency stood for DoGE. What a funny little boy Elon is.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 hour ago

they just want Russia to be the top superpower

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure that'll be popular and there won't be any repercussions and that unicorns will poop free candy for everyone.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Doesn't matter. Everyone enjoys their face being eaten. They can blame it on the damn (outgroup) and feel better about themselves. Rage and being better than some other tribe is all that matters anymore.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Okay I agree with the other comments here but I'm a bit confused on this.

How are we still spending money on these things if congress doesn't approve it? The legislature sets the budget, did they just forget to make it official and extend these? Also why even have a phase out period in the first place?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I think it's because there is a difference between the Budget and Appropriations in Congress. The budget is a plan, where programs are authorized and an overall budget is set. The appropriations process is what assigns particular dollars to particular discretionary programs. (Certain programs deemed "mandatory" by Congress, like Social Security, Medicare, and interest on the debt, get allocated money automatically and are not involved in appropriations)

If I had to guess, I would say that once a program is authorized once under a budget, it can continue as long as it (or the Federal department it is part of) is not specifically de-authorized, and as long as it continues to receive appropriations specifically for that program.

So, it is likely that this is all about Ramaswamy's total ignorance of how Congress works. Which tracks pretty well with what this DOGE is all about.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure this will help with the dramatic drop in people willing to volunteer for the army.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Nice of you to assume you won't get mandatory military service.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They stopped drafting people for a reason.

Maybe they forgot? Guess we'll have to remind them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 minutes ago (1 children)

90% of folks can't be trained to kill.

Half of the remainder would rather frag their own commanding officers than some poor foreign kid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 minutes ago

99% of stats are wrong.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 hours ago

We can't be taking care of Veterans that is way to decent of a thing to do for Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago

They won't cut the funding that goes to the richest Americans and themselves of course.

The crazy thing is the amount of money donated to a Trump by people who work for the Dept of Defense. Or maybe that includes contractors, aka, the rich.

I've can only hope that they fuck things up so bad that... Oh who am I kidding. There are to many stupid Americans for anything they do to make a difference in the Trumpublican party.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 hours ago

I am terrified at them defunding the VA. I've had a much easier time getting good medical care from VA doctors than I ever did going private and I'd be bankrupt without the VA. It's because of the VA that I have any savings at all

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago

These guys really seem to want a pissed off veteran to take them out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Karma

This is a c/leopardsatemyface moment.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I expected NASA to get screwed by DOGE. What I didn't expect was that it's at the behest of Ramaswamy instead of Elmo. 2024 is defying expectations yet again.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

NASA gives SpaceX fat government paychecks. He doesn't want anything to happen to them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Not necessarily. He wouldn't want anything to happen to the funding that ends up going to himself. He would likely be thrilled if their funding for designing and building their own rockets dried up, though.

It's right in line with the purpose of DOGE and an easy sell to anybody that doesn't immediately see the conflict of interest: "Why are we spending $100 million annually to play catch-up with the private sector? Reallocate $80 million to get rockets that work today and save the taxpayers $20 million while doing it."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I dunno I disagree. I think he'd like nothing more than if NASA just completely disappeared. I've thought that since the second they started talking about him guiding fiduciary spending. Once NASA is out of the picture, it's all SpaceX all the time. Trump is already most of the way there anyway. "His rocket company is the only reason we can now send American astronauts into space."

This is part of the plan I suspect.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Yep he doesn’t want NASA to steal his thunder with the first manned moon landing since the Apollo program. NASA’s Orion is competing directly with SpaceX

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I don't think he actually cares much about achieving anything spaceflight related. The guy has been hyping up his companies by holding big events for technologies ready in "X years" and consistently failing to deliver on either deadlines, tangible progress, quality, or sometimes all three of those.

I'm under the impression that E-con Musk sees a golden opportunity to use his undeserved status as a competent inventor and businessman as an opportunity to redirect government funds into his own pocket.

load more comments
view more: next ›