nifty

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Use a sewing needle to un-forgor it, post results

417
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I think the focus on “green” is distracting, and they should focus on working class woes first

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Many of them are low prospect, so it’s not a surprise. They’re hoping a male supremacy will help them survive financially, but most will still suffer as that’s just how number games work in a callous system. If they’d voted for Harris they’d at least get some benefits while being low prospect

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

The Dems need to implement the Nordic Model of economic and social policies in the U.S., it’s not that hard outside of removing oversized lobbying influence on U.S. politics

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_model

[–] [email protected] 58 points 3 days ago

Pelosi’s response kinda proves that the DNC is just the other side of the shit coin running the funhouse arcade game of American democracy

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Oh snap I know secret info now

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Not necessarily, democracy has often come about without blood shed. I am unconvinced the practical implementations of far left ideals are going to be devoid of human nature. Committees responsible for production vs CEO managing it does not still preclude greed or popularity contests. The in fighting in left leaning groups is a distraction. First tax the rich enough so that they cannot subvert democracy, everything is secondary

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Unconstrained campaign financing and lobbying will always dilute the power of democracy and liberalism, but liberalism is a good alternative to bloody revolutions or forced changes. Humanist philosophies prefer liberalism to some degree, but I could be wrong 🤷‍♀️

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

Bit more than that, it’s maybe the end of American influence in the world because the neocon 3.0 agenda will bring intense economic strife and social suffering. The environmental and regulatory policies will lead to infrastructure deterioration and polluted air, water etc. The health policies will lead to a weak and sick population. The rich and upper middle class will live in Nordic countries or Europe, as they mostly already do, where they will enjoy the social policies that they deprive Americans of. Most talent will likely go to other countries. But I seriously hope I am wrong.

 
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Find your people, stick by them, and support each other

 

Meme unrelated, or idk

 

Democrats present a weak front against strongmen opponents and are surprised when they lose voters who don’t trust the Dems to protect them from autocrats

386
Rule men (lemmy.world)
 
192
Rulescue (lemmy.world)
 

 
 
 
 
1279
No excuse (lemmy.world)
 
 

Reposting because the last one got auto-mod removed 😭

Summary is basically that Republican presidents have historically been worse for the economy! How the hell do people believe the opposite!?

Previous thread got restored! Thanks !jordanlund 🫡

https://lemmy.world/post/21035170?scrollToComments=true

view more: next ›