this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
344 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3262 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

Yes, please. Protecting and solidifying rights in the areas we can is the only way we can get through this nightmare. Hopefully progressives can claw back from this although it’s going to take generations.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly I'd feel safer if we reduce the power of the federal government and put the power to the states. Sorry left-leaning people in red states, can't let states like yours drag the country down with you.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

As someone in a swing state, I’d be ok with that. Make the US like the EU.

For one thing, every 4 years residents of swing states get relentlessly harassed and it fucking sucks. But also It’s so so much easier to make changes on a smaller local level without the influence of distant populations. Sure it would suck in some ways and for some states, but maybe if each state only had to convince a few thousand people to do better, rather than literally millions (presidential election, very demoralizing), swing states would be more left leaning.

And if not, well it would probably be a lot easier to move states than move countries, even if they were EU style countries.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

After all, you don't need to learn a new language or integrate into a new culture when you move. People move in Europe all the time, and the US states is easy mode compared to that

[–] [email protected] 111 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I bet the state’s rights crowd will love this

[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Literally the civil war started because kansas didn't want to be a slave state. The whole state's right thing is just a talking point not a held belief.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Are you saying the next civil war will be fought over abortion and LGBTQ rights?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think it's more likely blue states secede than civil war. If enough liberal folks got on board, the conservatives would bit at the chance to be the new USA with a majority of the states.

I also think the impetus won't be social, it will be economic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Cecession will literally start a new civil war. I'm looking forward to killing some traitors.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm just saying the whole "state's rights" things is sort of a red herring. The right believes they don't have to follow the rules; "crimes are when undesireables do things only I should be allowed to do"

[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 week ago (3 children)

No concrete plans yet but we’ll see what they can do. Good to see that some people haven’t given up all hope.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

California should just separate from Fed

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

5th largest economy in the world, motherfuckers!

We don't need the US, but their military means we're fucked should we ever try, anyway

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Solve the water crisis, then yeah

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Australia uses desalinization and it works well.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A constitutional crisis is very likely over the next 4 years. And if it does, all bets are off.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The crisis already happened when the SC declared the President a dictator and Biden didn't have them executed for it with the powers they just gave him.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Technically they said Presidents and Former Presidents cannot be prosecuted for it, not give them the authority to. You still have to find a "yes-man" to obey those orders. Biden can try, tell the military to kill SCOTUS members for treason, they say "Sorry Mr. President No-can-do". Biden might be immune for trying to do it.

*keyword "might" be, but Scotus can say "that was not an official act"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

*keyword “might” be, but Scotus can say “that was not an official act”

In this thought experiment, they would certainly not be able to say that because they wouldn't exist anymore.

Any new justices would certainly certainly hold the Biden-preferred opinion, because otherwise he wouldn't nominate them. (That opinion would neither be "Biden is immune and this is fine" nor "that was not an official act," but rather "we're overturning the previous decision and making the President prosecutable for illegal official acts again," because forcing that ruling would be the entire point of the exercise, BTW.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

In this thought experiment, they would certainly not be able to say that because they wouldn’t exist anymore.

Bruh my brain is so filled with election anxiety that I don't even realize this fact 🤣

But the point remains, the military would never obey such orders. Biden would have to quickly fire the chain of commands until he finds such commander, find a unit in the military willing to perform such illegal act, carry out the act, then get senate to confirm new justices. Oh btw Democrats still believe in the rule of law, senate Democrats would never approve this, even if he orders 50 of the most conservative members killed (50 is quorum btw) there wouldn't be 25 democrats willing to confirm them. What would happen is republican house would impeach biden along with like 90% of democrats voting in favor, then the senate would probably like 40/50 dems voting to convict. Democrats would lose the electoral college like all the swing states against whatever republican is running, even if he tries to get the entire republican ticket killed, since non voting republicans would be raging against democrats. The Democratic party would have to disband and form another party to try to rebrand.

I mean Biden is not a dictator, he can only do what average Democratic politicians in congress would deem acceptable. I mean at this point its just political fan-fiction. This is civil war territory and any speculation would sound surreal and ridiculus.

(The results of this election is already surreal enough)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

He could have asked for volunteers. I know one person.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do not give up hope. Don't stop trying to make the world a better place. As long as we have people that take action, we still have hope.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I still have hope... just not for America. I can make somewhere else better.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately, I believe America affects the world.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm done, y'all can have hope. My hope was deleted long ago.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm prone to thinking like that too, but what keeps me from staying that way is the knowledge that that's exactly what the fascists want. So fuck em, it may be illogical but they can pry my belief that we can build a better world from my cold dead hands.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

This is where I'm landing too. I will stay hopeful out of spite for these fuckers.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Fighting fascism is a great cause to rally behind and give people purpose.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

If nothing else, save a little for the next vote in 2 years. We can't afford to lose you.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've done nothing useful or transformative.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't need to be a rockstar. Almost nobody's a rockstar. We need you to be you and to give at least one shit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Just the smallest shit. One iota. One atom.

Don't give in to what those fuckers want.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

True, at least the magas don’t have full control of every state government.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thats the small hope I'm hanging on to. Federalism might save our country from fascism. Hopefully...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It will do the exact same thing that happened last time:

Create a civil war.

As the good option.