this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
304 points (98.4% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6573 readers
597 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago

sumbermeme 👍

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

literally the script of tenet

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm thinking the problem might be with the pre-drowned crew 🤔

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

I think the pre-drowned crew in Pirates of the Caribbean did pretty well, and it's cool so I think we should go for it!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I guess we need to make them air-tight, then.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Well that was terrible advice. I made the entire crew air-tight and the lazy bastards haven't moved since.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's a Zëven Provincien Class frigate right? Looks similar to the Sachsen-class with the Smart-L on the aft tower and the bridge design, but has that gap between VLS and bridge (except for that I'd have said Sachsen-class)

Edit: just noticed the radar one the first tower and the funnel being seperated, is this a British destroyer, Type 13 something?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

I think Russia is trying something like that

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Boats get covered with water when hit by missiles, therefore we need to get rid of all the water to handle that exception

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Daring class destroyer. For the two people on the whole internet who were wondering.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This comment is so underrated its Untersee

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

People say this like it's a bad thing...

Kind regards

Confused golfer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What's funny about this is you absolutely can sink a submarine, if anything it's easier to do than a surface vessel.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apparently not if you're actually trying to sink it yourself. Thats a one way ticket to getting your sub captured and placed in a large museum where people can witness your failure for generations to come.

Just ask the Germans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

On the other hand, the Russians lost one because the captain didn't know how the toilet worked.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Simple, simple children. Pull up a chair. You don’t sink the ships underwater, you sink them on land! Just like the genius strategist Zakalwe , and he fought in the hell wars!

[–] [email protected] 65 points 2 days ago

Submarines re-invented by NCD

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago

Bro just discovered submarines...