this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
365 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3380 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Flynn should reinstated, stripped of rank, court martialed and thrown into Ft. Leavenworth. He is a traitor and a POS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

not happening

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

Flynn, should forced back into active duty, stripped of rank, all benefits yanked, court martialed and thrown into Ft. Leavenworth. The mother fucker is a traitor and take Bannon too.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Any of you anti-gun people have second thoughts hearing shit like this?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm mostly in favor of gun ownership, but unless I'm allowed to own RPGs, bombs, and other similar equipment then I'm not going to be able to do much against the military with it. Gun ownership is for self-defense, not fighting the military like so many right wing nuts dream about. The only real option if fighting the military happens is aid from outside or taking the military's equipment. Both of these do not require prior ownership of weapons. Alternatively, knowledge of bomb making would be another tool, and does not require prior ownership, though this knowledge is controlled already and not defended by typical gun-rights organizations.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Everyone looks at extremes.

Yeah, a populace armed with AR-15s and Glocks can't fight bombers, but when a government reaches the point where bombers are being used against the population you'll also have a military split, so there will be heavy equipment on both sides.

Imagine something smaller in scale, like if the governor of Texas decided to start execution of liberals while Trump was President. Trump probably wouldn't directly take part, but also wouldn't send in the military to stop the governor.

That's where small arms for civilians becomes relevant.

They're also relevant because they're distributed. With 100 million+ armed households, there's no safe way to be a tyrant.

Trump was almost killed by 1 person who planned poorly. If there were millions of armed people moved to that level of violence it would be impossible to govern without committing the kind of atrocity that would cause a military split/coup.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you haven't been targeted by the police for running your mouth at them then who are you lecturing exactly ?

Why are you attacking your allies ? Not everyone should have a fucking gun, mate.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The gun people are expecting the guns to be pointed at the libs. They're all for it.

They are absolutely clueless that any dictator strips guns from people because they can't bear any threat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I am gun people....I'm not point my shit at Americans.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The US is spending $1.7T over the next thirty years to completely overhaul its nuclear arsenal.

But don't worry, I've got a Beretta in my holster and a shotgun under the bed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You forget about Vietnam? Isis is also kicking around still too which you have to know about seeing how recent that one was.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

It's not worth the argument. They won't understand.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

I’m about winning. We have to win. And these people are already up to no good. So, we gotta win first. We win, and then, “Katy, bar the door.” OK? Believe me: The gates of hell — my hell — will be unleashed.

As my MSNBC colleague Steve Benen just explained, Trump is now openly floating the idea of deploying the military against his critics if he’s elected. It’s easy to imagine Flynn being part of that violent plan.

The guy who was all-in on Qanon, who had his family take whatever stupid pledge on video, who asked why we couldn't "do that here" when Myanmar's army stole their government, wants to be in charge. Frightening stuff.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Heaven and hell needing gates is worrying. I suspect their purpose is containment.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago

During his first term he just cracked the gates of hell open a little and we had sky-rocketing national debt and over a million covid deaths. Next time he will fling them wide open guaranteeing chaos and the deaths of millions. Listen to him. Believe him on this.
Putin must be giddy that his plan for the destruction of the U.S. might come together.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

“What your sentiment is about is accountability,” said Flynn, adding that the Founding Fathers had a similar priority.

“I definitely believe we need accountability,” he said.

“Your question went into some other areas,” Flynn added with a laugh, before concluding: “I think a lot of people actually think like you do, and I think that that’s your right and our privilege. ... There’s a way to get after this, but we have to win first.”

Uh oh....

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

George Washington would shoot Flynn in the face.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Theodore Roosevelt would rip off his arms and beat him to death with them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

After trampling Trump with a moose.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is it bad if I want Flynn to be Mike Johnson’s accountability partner after reading that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Accountabili-buddy!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

What a jerk

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That we have to worry about the xtian taliban getting power via dementia donnie....in 2024.

We are talking about terrorism here. Why do all these old fucks want life to be miserable for everyone else? Is it because they think they are at the end of of their lives?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Suffering is a core part of the conservative philosophy. Conservatives despise the idea that life can be easier, despite other countries showing us how to do these things.

Affordable higher education, universal healthcare, gun control, robust social safety nets, worker protections... of 31 developed nations, only the U.S. lacks these things. This is 100% because of conservatives.

Nothing good in the history of mankind has ever come from conservatism. Nothing at all. It is a plague of misery, oppression and death that is long overdue for a cure.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Republicans remind me of the Krohn's disease med Skyrizi. "Control means everything to me"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

It's 100% because of thevery wealthy owning all three branches of government.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Suffering is a core part of the conservative philosophy. Conservatives despise the idea that life can be easier, despite other countries showing us how to do these things.

Suffering for those they disagree with. Hard lives for those they dislike, while conservatives pay lip service to their hardships and buy off their problems with indulgences.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

No, it's because they've been miserable their entire lives despite having the world handed to them on a gold-colored platter.

load more comments
view more: next ›