this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
170 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3395 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

The insanity of this even being a potential threat to a retired soldier shows what a perverse reality we’re experiencing.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All these book authors could have published when he was in office or before.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Woodward has. Fear: Trump in the White House (September 11, 2018), Rage (September 15, 2020), Peril (September 2021), The Trump Tapes: Bob Woodward's Twenty Interviews with President Donald Trump (January 2023), and now War.

Generally right before a midterm or presidential election.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

2018-21 I was working through a lot of stuff, so I'm not surprised I missed that. 23 I don't know why I missed that. Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

They really don't make journalists like Woodward any more.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“If the Fake News reporting is correct, [Milley] was actually dealing with China to give them a heads up on the thinking of the President of the United States,” Trump wrote in the post on his Truth Social site.

That must have been a short phone call.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"He's a fucking idiot."

click

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

"We already know."

Click

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“If the Fake News reporting is correct, [Milley] was actually dealing with China to give them a heads up on the thinking of the President of the United States,” Trump wrote in the post on his Truth Social site.

What does that actually mean, "If the Fake News reporting is correct"? Does he just reflexively call news "fake news" even when he thinks it's true?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

What does that actually mean, “If the Fake News reporting is correct”? Does he just reflexively call news “fake news” even when he thinks it’s true?

Shroedinger's Lugenpresse.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Guardian:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/11/bob-woodward-book-mark-milley-trump
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support