this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
457 points (95.8% liked)

Greentext

4208 readers
879 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 128 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

"I just want a manic pixie dream girl whos never known the touch of a man but is an absolute nymphomaniac and doesn't have sharp knees is that so much to ask???"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

I just say "I'll know when I meet her."

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

Those are not unreasonable preferences

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

The tinder one is though. Someone being on tinder doesn't tell you anything about that person. Only that they're looking for either a partner or casual sex.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Reasonable preferences stated in the form of red flags are still red flags.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 238 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

There are more appropriate ways to say this:

"Nobody with kids. I might want kids some day, but I'm not ready yet, and it feels like there would be too much pressure to either be involved with her kids or be cut out of a major portion of her life until we're really serious. And again, not ready.

And somebody athletic, since I'm into biking and hiking and other activities that require a certain level of fitness.

And... well, somebody who isn't into the whole casual sex thing, honestly. I think sex is special and, for me, requires a strong emotional connection. I want someone who has similar views on sex."

See, I feel like it changes it when you're not focusing on the other person, but yourself. I'm not ready for kids, I'm into fitness, I'm a demisexual. It sets up the same thing without disparaging people who aren't what you're looking for.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I like how you put this. Anon was asked requirements and all he gave were deal-breakers. It comes off as desperate, crass, or both.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Its also fake. I could rewrite the ending.

"Friends GF laughs uncontrollably at my list of dealbreakers, as she's drunk and at a bar, not sober at a coffee shop"

"Friends gf proceeds to go around the bar posing my list to every woman, and eventually also all the men, hysterically laughing the whole time while I try to hide by the jukebox."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'll first say that from a social standpoint it makes sense to focus on yourself when asked that. But the person asked "tell me what you look for in a girl". You would have to be pretty damn masterful at thinking on your feet to take that question and immediately flip your answers into I statements. Especially if you're anon and obviously don't get asked things like this a lot.

No kids is a common wish although the reason for it can make or break how fine it is to have.

My guess is that anon is overweight, and the person they were talking to was thinking of friends they had that were overweight and were great people.

Anon betrayed that their preference was a bit delusional and/or didn't understand that it can take work to be in shape and takes it for granted that women should be expected to be fit for him without him having to do anything. That's a pretty sour fart of an opinion.

The no dating apps thing is pretty cringe. And could certainly make you seem like a pariah to most people. It definitely betrays a sense of superiority if it's in your top 3 dating requirements. I feel like anon knowing the word demisexual is slim to none but that would be the best thing you could say.

Actually my guess is that this is fake and anon is just stirring the hate mongering pot.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I also casually declare strangers I meet at a bar for 20 minutes to be great catches and offer up any of my single friends phone numbers. Dont you?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yep, it's all about the framing.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago

Could an average rowboat support her without capsizing?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Probably because she was big, had a kid, and was on tinder 😆

[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

The third one is pretty weird, it's just the default way to meet people now.

The other two are pretty straightforward.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tinder is the worst possible way to get to meet people, unless you’re at least a 9/10 guy or a woman who just wants to hook up, nothing more. At least that’s been my experience, both using the app and talking to friends who have. Meaningful connections are rare.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

It might be a regional thing? I live in a Town known for its Technical University, so most of the people on Tinder are socially awkward and tech literate 18-25 y/os who either don't like going to noisy places like bars, clubs etc. or just prefer texting first before committing time to a date (free time is kind of hard to make as a student here).

My own reason was more on the autistic side, as I do NOT recognize flirting unless it is specifically stated. So having an app where both parties can state "hey, we're talking with romantic intentions here!!" was the best solution ever haha (I met my husband within 30mins of installing the app 🤷)

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

no girls who are on dating apps like Tinder

But why tho?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A reasonable argument would be because oop sees sex as something special and would like a partner that thinks of it the same way.

In reality, oop probably thinks of woman who are on tinder as worthless sluts and doesn’t want a woman with a higher headcount than him because it bruises his ego.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I too, would be upset if my hypothetical partner had more kills than me. Excuse me, I'm the killing machine here. I'm the one who's body is designed to rip and tear and glide through the air! You're making me look lazy.

How dare u!

(I will almost always take the chance to make fun of the act of using "headcount" or "bodycount" to refer to the number of sexual partners someone has had.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Fair question! I'm guessing he views such women as sluts and beneath him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago

Makes sense to me, but I'm odd like anon too I guess. I won't work for places that have an HR department for (likely) similar complex reasoning. I don't fit the mold or follow the rules like most people in a job. Just give me responsibilities and I'll be as reliable as if you do them yourself. I don't handle arbitrary people and bureaucracy well. I just do what makes sense in the moment like a business owner that is very conservative. I ran my own businesses for a long time and act like the employees I wish I had been able to find. When a company has an HR department it says they are inflexible and incompetent in efficiency and abstraction. I know I will be miserable in such a place where layers are used to mask managerial incompetence and political maneuvering.

Similarly, a person that likes to shop around and date a lot says quite a bit about their ethics and mindset. I've never used a dating app in my life. All of my long term relationships are from friends of friends. I have no curiosity about who is out there in general or judging people based on their best sales force lies or old pictures. I am only interested in the rare people that say or do something candidly interesting when I am not expecting it; like if someone has a nerdy passionate interest or interesting quark. The average person is not interesting to me, and average people are on dating apps.

Plus, I know what I am, and I do not care to try and sell that to anyone. I would much rather the person at least have some familiarity with me beforehand. Starting off formally of calling it "dating" just sounds silly to me. Like, let's be friends first for awhile. "Dating" puts sex in play on some kind of level. No one can think straight after that addiction starts. So, friends-first for me, and dating apps are not the kind of environment where I can find nerdy interesting friends without extra baggage and expectations.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

U tell me

I think it's 100% reasonable to not want to meet dating app girls

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

I know a reasonable girl that wouldn't use Tinder in the intended way, she just made an account to see how many guys in Delhi would swipe right on her when she enabled a VPN to pretend to be in India. (Lots)

Does this count?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m old and don’t understand. Elucidate me, nerd

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Not OP but:

You: Dont like Tinder girls because you are sexist and dont like "hoes".

Me: Dont like Tinder girls because it means they gave all their private data and pictures to a big tech corpo that sells it for profit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›