this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
878 points (97.8% liked)

News

28354 readers
4218 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

JD Vance was roundly mocked online over a trip to the supermarket where he bemoaned the steep price of eggs — and botched the photo opp.

The Republican vice presidential nominee stopped by a supermarket in Reading, Pennsylvania, with his sons over the weekend to illustrate how grocery prices have been impacted by “Kamala Harris’s policies” when he claimed a dozen eggs cost $4.

The problem? When footage of the visit emerged, Vance was quickly called out by viewers who spotted the price tag of a dozen eggs behind him was actually $2.99.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 months ago

It's only one banana, what could it cost. Ten Dollars?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Well I mean you can get eggs for $4. You don't have to, but you can. It depends on how well you want the chickens to be treated.

I mean don't get me wrong, Vance is still a fucking tool. But the prices of premium products do not reflect the prices of what the average working class consumer can afford.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (3 children)

You can get eggs for $10,000 if someone is willing to charge that much and you're willing to pay it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

It depends on how well you want the chickens to be treated.

Sounds like legislative skill isssue.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

James "JD Vance" Bowman is either the dumbest man alive, or it's a 7D plan to sabotage the Trump campaign

Either is possible

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

that's not applicable for fascists. they're stupid and malicious.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Or not stupid and act stupid for plausible deniability should anything fall back into them.

The government in my country isn't even fascist, just conservative and abused this mechanism for extreme corruption without any consequences. (A ministry "failed" and gave a company almost half a billion in contract-penalties for literally no work at all. Lots of other shady shit happened, like destroyed documents or missing documentation... a total mess on purpose)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Is JD Vance wearing eyeliner? He looks like a poor Tim Minchin impersonator.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I remember reading somewhere that it was likely something he picked up from his wife, as it is apparently not uncommon in India?

That could have been a lie, but honestly who cares how the guy chooses to dress or present? His views and words are toxic enough that we don’t need to resort to personal attacks on his appearance; calling him and his ilk ‘weird’ is more cutting to them than anything else.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

I mean, he probably shouldn't be talking about drag queens.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My problem with it, and this might be wrong so sorry if i am, is that he doesnt have a clue how the people he represents live. Politics have separated from the people and he doesnt recognize this. Instead of understanding his job or his land, he seem to care more for his looks. Its another little step in diverting from the people. I personally have no problem at all if someone just does what he/she likes as long as no boundaries are hurt. Im happy that this gets more common these days.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (3 children)

The best way to look at it is to ask “if he cared less about his appearance, and dressed more slovenly - would it excuse his abhorrent views and stances?”.

If the answer is no, then it should be a non-factor.

A cynical part of me thinks that some of the more outlandish politicians dress that way (Trump’s hair dye and fake tan, JD Vance’s guyliner, Boris Johnson’s unkempt hair, etc.) are done in part as an attempt to de-rail reporting by having us fall into the easy trap of ridiculing their appearance rather than criticising their views and actions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

To me, it's more about the fact that if any of his followers saw someone in makeup and decided they were a man in any other instance, they would treat that person like shit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

It's to make them stand out, so you don't confound them with other people.

Trump just looks like any old man without his ridiculous makeup.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

While I do think this is an intended strategy for Boris Johnson (he’s admitted as much), I think the clown show which is Vance / Trump, and don’t forget Giuliani’s dripping hair dye, is not premeditated. That would be giving them too much credit.

I think they are just simply bumbling from one grift to the next, completely unaware of how ridiculous they look.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

And they'll still believe and defend him. 🙄

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (4 children)

The conservative folks I talk to always, always, always bring up the price of eggs and the price of gas when they are talking about how bad the economy is these days.

I've heard "Groceries have doubled in price." many times. Obviously I can't prove that's not true for them, but then I ask what items that they buy regularly have doubled in price? The answer: "Eggs".

Okay, so what else, I know that eggs alone do not make up your entire grocery bill? "Everything". That's pretty much all I get.

Even if they can tell me a few more things that have doubled in price, it's basically going to be outliers or things I know for a fact they rarely/never buy. Like when it comes to the eggs, they'll make claims like "eggs are $10 a dozen", but when pressed about it, you find out they're talking about the gourmet premium brand that's always been way more expensive than the cheap ones and which they've never purchased in their entire lives.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

I consume a lot of cottage cheese. Pre-Covid the 48oz container I buy cost about $2.50. The price spiked to about $5.00 during quarantine and has since fallen down to about $3.00. There's a lot of items that have followed similar trends and, while they're more expensive than they were in early 2020, they're not at their Covid spike prices which is what everyone seems to think.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm not a right winger and while I can't give specifics exactly, I do basically buy the same things every week because I'm boring like that. All cheap stuff, no organic or gourmet anything. I can say that in the last say 18 months I went from spending $65-$80/week depending on whether I was restocking non food items, to spending $110-120/week. Not exactly double, but damn close.

To get it back to the 70ish I now just eat less and I don't buy any extras like anything premade. :/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Okay but groceries actually have doubled in price. Where they're wrong is the blame. They blame Biden, who actually got the trust busting stick out. While giving a pass to GOP leaders who just keep blaming the poor while grocery chains gleefully price gouge us.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

This. I actually drink water now beacuse soda is too fucking expensive

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The "gourmet premium eggs" (regular eggs laid by pastured chickens instead of life-in-a-tiny-cage chickens) also barely increased in price during the covid/bird flu/supply chain price gouge excuses.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Weird thing is, sometimes the "premium" eggs are cheaper than the standard eggs, because the prices don't fluctuate nearly as much. I have a thing of cage free brown eggs in my fridge that was actually cheaper than the plain, white store brand eggs right now.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›