this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
570 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2931 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 174 points 2 months ago (43 children)

WHY THE FUCK HAS EVERYONE NOT DELETED TWITTER

there is literally no correct answer

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What can I say, I like to watch dumpster fires

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (42 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

The tech leader has faced scrutiny for various posts and reposts on X in recent months, including last November, when he engaged with a post about an antisemitic conspiracy theory.

He’s not leading anything. Not at all. He buys in and lets others innovate or he runs them into the ground like his shitty website. His leadership is poison.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

I'm GLAD that Instead of my Taxdollars going to Feed STARVING AMERICAN CHILDREN it's INSTEAD going to a Person openly calling for the Assassination of our Vice President!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Smart move.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

First, I wouldn’t assume that there isn't anyone planning to assassinate Harris.

Second, let's not pretend that there hasn't been political violence coming from Trump's side of the aisle. For example, does the phrase "where's Nancy" ring a bell?

Third, Trump has positioned himself as an authoritarian strong man who will not be restrained by laws, facts, institutions or norms. He has embraced extremism and excused violence. He promotes hatred, division and conspiracy theories. He attacks law enforcement and courts when they apply the law to him, while simultaneously threatening to wield them as a political tool to persecute his enemies. He has managed to get the Supreme Court to declare the president to be above the law up to and including being able to order the assassination of political rivals. He has rejected democracy, attempted to steal the last election, and incited a riot at at the capital in order to coerce congress into going along with his coup attempt. When that failed, he called for the constitution to be thrown out, and stated that members of his own administration that didn't support him should be executed. He's wielded his influence in the Republican party to undermine the defense of Ukraine and support for NATO, and has single-handedly weakened NATO by threatening to withdraw and sowing doubt as to whether the US can be counted on to honor the defensive pact at the heart of the alliance. He encouraged opposition to basic public health protections during a pandemic simply because they looked bad politically, fanning the flames of an anti-science and anti-health movement that significantly increased the death toll. He has promised to be a dictator, and wants to purge the federal government of anyone who is not loyal to him and his agenda. He has a base full of rabid nutcases who routinely threaten violence and intimidate those that get in the way or try to enforce the law. He uses Nazi rhetoric and is supported by neo nazis, white supremacists, and other militant groups. He also has the backing of numerous billionaires that wield disgusting amounts of power and influence, and he's made no secret that he is willing to sell policy in exchange for contributions.

And that's not even an exhaustive list, just the first things that come to mind. Quite frankly, Trump is so toxic and such a clear threat to basically everything that America and liberal democracy is supposed to be about that it's not a surprise that someone would take a shot at him.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

A fucking moron, truly.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I didn't imply assassination attempts of the vice president when I was an 8 year old boy. This guy is a lunatic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Will no one rid me of this meddlesome priest?"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Damn, made this joke too late

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It is odd that this man has any government contract, let alone any national security contract with the United States government

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah... spend some time actually interacting with people with clearances. They are people just like any other so you have some humans and some deranged chuds. And everyone in positions of power are either political appointees (elected or otherwise) or ladder climbers who want to suckle on the teat of those appointees.

So when you point out that someone is actively cheering for russia in a conflict with our allies or is openly calling people slurs? You get told that people are allowed to have political opinions and you are the problem. Because YOU are the reasonable person who will drop it. Whereas they will then bitch and moan that someone in IT has "blue hair" and whine until a local politician runs on that and suddenly everyone has very strict dress codes.

Which, in turn, leads to people leaving in droves which just leaves the shitheads and the appeasers.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've actually had clearances and government contracts. I've seen them pulled for much less than what Elmo did here.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Not for the upper managers though, right? I've also had clearances, and I know about some shocking things that some of the government managers did while never so much as being investigated for them.

Contractors are different though.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Indeed. He seems like a dangerous and unstable individual. Shouldn’t he be on a watchlist instead?

[–] [email protected] 277 points 2 months ago (8 children)

“Well, one lesson I’ve learned is that just because I say something to a group and they laugh doesn’t mean it’s going to be all that hilarious as a post on X,” he wrote Monday, adding later, “Turns out that jokes are WAY less funny if people don’t know the context and the delivery is plain text.”

The owner of Twitter is learning how text-based communication works in realtime before our eyes.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Lol at "the context". Bitch, WHAT context would make it any better?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

I’m sure the yes men he surrounds himself with was “the context”.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lots of regular people know thats its risky to send a sarcastic text

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Turns out some things simply aren't funny. Not posting a thought right when it comes to your head also helps.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Slash he surrounded himself with people absolutely willing to step on one another to gain power and wealth so of course they're going to laugh at all of his "jokes"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

probably one of the lawyers told him to cool it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 159 points 2 months ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 2 months ago (1 children)
  • lots of negative blowback: “it was a joke!”
  • not that much negative blowback, at least initially: “yeah I meant that”
[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 months ago

aka Schrodinger's douchebag.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (4 children)

If only the Bible said something about this.

Now we need people to read and remember what their book actually says.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Thanks. A handy verse to throw in the face of those who claim to be Christians.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Well IDGAF what you GAF about

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago

That’s always the lame cover up.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 158 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Elon Musk deletes his stochastic terrorism tweet.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The best thing that could come from the Harris election is cut ALL Musks government contracts.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Won't someone rid me of this meddlesome ~~priest~~ vice president

[–] [email protected] 85 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Good thing it didn't get out to the internet. That would be embarrassing to keep being reminded of.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

Even if it did get out to the Internet, though, all you have to do is delete it and it instantly disappears.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›