this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
646 points (99.5% liked)

politics

24396 readers
3279 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/31570120

Four years after Gov. Greg Abbott announced Texas would be the first state to build its own border wall, lawmakers have quietly stopped funding the project, leaving only scattered segments covering a small fraction of the border.

That decision, made in the waning hours of this year’s legislative session, leaves the future of the state wall unclear. Just 8% of the 805 miles the state identified for construction is complete, which has cost taxpayers more than $3 billion to date. The Texas Tribune reported last year that the wall is full of gaps that migrants and smugglers can easily walk around and mostly concentrated on sprawling ranches in rural areas, where illegal border crossings are less likely to occur.

State leaders suggested the federal government could pick up the effort. However, during President Donald Trump’s first term, when wall building was his top priority, his administration completed just 21 miles in Texas — about a third of what the state was able to build over the past four years.

The Tribune reported last year that the state’s wall program would take around 30 years and more than $20 billion to complete.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Hey, I smell a scam. What happened to all those billions that Mexico gave us to build that wall?!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

But it was so important?

Billions of rapists and hyper-violent drugged out gang members are flooding over the border every second.

Does Texas not care about protecting their people? The country?

Or.. was it all absolute fucking bullshit designed to funnel a few million dollars to one of Abbotts cohorts?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Next time I need scrap metal for a project, I know where to go.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean, no shit. The goal was never the actual wall. The goal was what the wall represented. To be able to arrest, oppress, and "remove" any brown person they wanted.

We're already at the Home Depot parking lot arrest and we're not even 6 months in. If liberals keeps talking about the wall as if it's a hypocrisy that will sway Trump supporters they'll lose that battle.

It was never about a wall. It was about bringing fascism to America. And that wall is taller than anything Texas could ever build.

Please stop thinking you'll fight fascism with liberal "gotchas" of hypocrisy. That's far behind us. If you're not on the streets with a sign then at least just keep your focus in the right place.

Focus on the HARM that is being done. Not some fake promise of a wall that no one ever cared about beyond the aesthetics and it's symbolism.

Tell your parents about the nice guy are home depot that helped you move your couch. That got taken by ICE for just trying to make a living. These personal stories resonate with that generation.

But no one cares about a dumb ass wall. MAGA never did. And if you think they did you missed the the point and the appeal of Trump entirely.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

4 years for $3 Billion but 30 years for only $20 Billion. Sure, guys.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So what happened to the $77 billion left to build the wall? Oh, they griffed it. Just like everything the Donvict makes, it goes to shit and he runs off with the money. Suddenly there's no more immigrant crisis on the Texas border. Clearly it wasn't the fucking wall that stopped it. Also, all that imminent domain claimed on farmers and habitat owners also just had their land completely stolen not for "imminent domain" purposes.

His next term is in 2026. That's right, he's going for a 20 year tenure. There is not a limit on how many times you can be a Texas governor.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's too popular. Precisely because he brought $77B into the state to line his friends' pockets.

Who is going to run against Abbott that isn't just a more Fash version of him? Any Democrat that runs will campaign on "Actually I always supported the wall and I'm upset he didn't build it fast enough". Any Republican in the primaries will complain that Abbott is too nice to Jews.

And then every newspaper and TV channel in the state will endorse him, because that's what their sponsors told them to do. The state will split 46/54, with a weird 40,000 vote undercount in Harris County and six counties in the Panhandle voting GOP to a man. And he'll be in for another four years while the Green Party gets blamed for another liberal defeat.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Any Democrat that runs will campaign on "Actually I always supported the wall and I'm upset he didn't build it fast enough".

Maybe they should try not being an idiot.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Sorry, I hired a political consultant at $12,000/hr and he told me voters will only support idiots.

Besides, we need to do something as a party to distance ourselves from Muslims, Women, PoC, and the LGBTQ community. They're holding us back and scaring off all the white male social media millionaires!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I see your argument, but having an opposing candidate that can read the room may significantly increase chances of victory. Of course, victory is a very fleeting concept for democrats.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

having an opposing candidate that can read the room may significantly increase chances of victory

Only in a large-turnout neck-and-neck general election, where the game actually is about who can deliver the right mix of popular red meat and inoffensive centrism.

In the more local races where the game is 90% getting name recognition, you don't need to read the room of voters. You need to court the donor pool that will endlessly and enthusiastically promote you. Go look at the NYC Mayoral race. One reason Cuomo has been the favorite to win since Day 1 - despite being a well-established sleazeball, DINO, and sex pest - is the 24/7/365 friendly media coverage.

Zohran's recent surge in support has come thanks to tons and tons of grassroots activists screaming his name at the top of their lungs. And the debates proved he's masterful at reading the crowd, focusing on the popular issues, deflecting criticism, and engaging a wide audience. But it's still an uphill climb against a guy whose family name has echoed through NY politics for nearly a century. Cuomo can shit the bed every day for a month and still never dip below 40% favorability, purely thanks to political inertia.

Just buying celebrity friendships is enough to keep Cuomo above water, even if he does have to spend $1000 for every $10 Mamdani can bring to bare.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

That was so 2016. We are all about full on fascism now.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How many college educations could have been fully funded for $3 billion? How many elementary schools built? How many other worthwhile problems could have been solved, rather than building a bunch of worthless crumbling garbage out in the desert?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Yeah, but that would be, like, helping people man.

Bootstraps motherfuckers!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Unfortunate. The metal materials of that wall was an excellent donation program to local businesses.

/s...? 🤔

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Good news for Mexico. I heard they were going to get quite a bill for that wall.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Thats one way to get ices 3000/d arrest quota

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No need for it now. America is so shit nobody wants to go there.

Be Mexico building the wall soon to keep Texans out.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

Mexico building the wall soon

So Trump is keeping promises?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

Utter failure, that is the legacy of the Republican party

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So now the Oklahomans are free to invade?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I'd say that this is the good ending but not even the Texans deserve to be subject to Oklahomans.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So stupid. They will just tunnel under a wall. Also walls do not block planes, which is where 90% of illegals come in. They buy a plane ticket, get here, and then just stay.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I mean, ladders exist too. What a bunch of idiots. Americans are drooling stupid.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You need a parade with “job well done” posters

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Make sure the parade weaves back and forth through some of the gaps in the Texas/Mexico border wall.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Promises made, promises kept" is an actual thing they like to say to each other, LOL.

I'm sure the dim bulbs will tell each other this kind of thing even as donvict tHe pEaCe pReSiDeNt leads us into a war with Iran just because Israel tells him to...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Tribune reported last year that the state’s wall program would take around 30 years and more than $20 billion to complete.

Typical Cheeto. Just claim something is super easy to do and won't cost a dime. When reality sinks in (usually years later after spending billions) that it's going to be over 100 times more expensive than he thought and will take decades longer than he thought, just quietly stop working on it...

Next up: the golden dome 🤮

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

The Golden (Teapot) Dome

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It shouldn't need funding, Mexico was supposed to pay for it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Maybe they meant like Mexico NY? Or New Mexico? Maybe he said Texaco?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

The cognitive disonnence is staggering.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Womp womp ....

load more comments
view more: next ›