this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
1090 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19238 readers
2227 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

F you, Taylor Swift!” shouted Megyn Kelly, “and f all of the people who want to see these children have body parts chopped off.”

For those not fluent in Republican crazy-speak, Kelly’s meltdown was triggered by Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris the night before, barely one hour after Trump all but face-planted on the debate stage. Kelly was especially triggered by Swift highlighting her appreciation for vice presidential nominee Tim Walz’s support of LGBTQ+ rights.

Other right-wing commentators, like Ben Shapiro, took another approach: making fun of Swifties. “Note: if you vote for a particular candidate because your favorite singer is doing so, please don’t vote. You are too stupid to vote,” wrote Shapiro on X. Meanwhile, Elon Musk, the richest man on the planet, threatened to impregnate her.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 3 months ago (16 children)

The party of rapists, child molesters and murderers is mad at Taylor Swift. She must've done something right. 🤔

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The argument that "you shouldn't vote for someone just because your favorite celebrity endorses them" seemed like a much more credible argument before the 2016 election when the winning candidate essentially won by literally being a celebrity.

Prior to 2016, Trump was probably best known for being the host of a reality TV show, and being a "businessman". Taylor Swift is definitely better known, and you could also make a solid argument that she is a better "businessman" as well.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Reagan was at least governor of California prior to running for president.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Actually that was Nancy, not Ronald.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They both suck IMO. But yeah, toward the end it was his handlers making the decisions.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I was trying weakly to reference Nancy's rumored penchant for giving head to anyone who asked, but yes - both were warm garbage.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 97 points 3 months ago (23 children)

If they didn't want her to voice her opinion they shouldn't have spent a week making fake ai images of her endorsing Trump. They forced her hand; she could either allow her likeness to be appropriated for a political cause she doesn't agree with, or make her true opinion known.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Republican rhetoric has constantly endangered innocent people and it is about time they start paying for it.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Was anyone on the left that mad when KidRock or Ted Nugent coming out in support of Dump?

No.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In fairness neither kid rock nor ted Nugent are relevant enough to convince any significant number of people to vote.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

if they supported child stone and theodore nugget, they were already on board with the republiKlan agenda

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Child Stone and Theodore Nugget has made my evening, thank you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Megyn Kelly is nasty ~ Donald Trump

Megyn has that short term GOP memory. These people have no soul.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

Also, fuck you too Megyn.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 months ago

Celebrities have every right to voice their opinion on national issues.

And, that is not a "zero risk" position.

A recent example is the formerly known: "Dixie Chicks". Research their dilemma.

And in the past, late 1940's, Hollywood had a "Blacklist" which was a very serious shit list which fucked over plenty of people.

Many American celebrities are also citizens with every right to voice their opinion the same as your lawn sign or bumper sticker. Yet, sometimes, it's a really good thing when those celebrities rally their groupies, Swifties, etc.

Like almost always, it boils down to others being jealous of the "power" of other people.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

not beating the "weird" allegations

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›