this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
681 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18870 readers
3846 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A tearful, unscripted moment between Tim Walz and his 17-year-old son, Gus, has unleashed a flood of praise and admiration – but also prompted ugly online bullying.

Gus Walz, who has a nonverbal learning disorder as well as anxiety and ADHD, watched excitedly from the front row of Chicago’s United Center and sobbed openly Wednesday night as his father, the Democratic nominee for vice president, delivered his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention.

...

Conservative columnist and right-wing provocateur Ann Coulter mocked the teenager’s tears. “Talk about weird,” she wrote on X. The message has since been deleted.

Mike Crispi, a Trump supporter and podcaster from New Jersey, mocked Walz’s “stupid crying son” on X and added, “You raised your kid to be a puffy beta male. Congrats.”

Alec Lace, a Trump supporter who hosts a podcast about fatherhood, took his own swipe at the teenager: “Get that kid a tampon already,” he wrote, an apparent reference to a Minnesota state law that Walz signed as governor in that required schools to provide free menstrual supplies to students.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Conservatives bear their teeth at the sight of happiness. Happy people aren't subjugated, scared, and in line.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Tangential to the point, but any writer that unironicslly uses the phrase "broke the internet" in a headline needs to be sent to a gulag.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

and added, “You raised your kid to be a puffy beta male. Congrats.”

I thought these were just characters in hollywood production. What the fuck.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I am not surprised that conservatives find open signs of affection, and the general feelings and expression of love between a child and father, to be "weird".

These comments come from people whose kids hate and/or resent them. Love, in general, is seen by them as weakness. These people need therapy, they are mentally ill.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

How the fuck it's related to his disability or anything?

Imagine your father, like a not deadbeat one, a caring one, having his once-in-the-life moment at the state-wide convention. It's not weird to cry. It's weird not to.

Men do cry, men do have emotions, men aren't a fuel for a vehicle you hop on. And men are well capable of anger. The anger against a fucko who laughs at other man's kid.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Men cry, and cowards hide their emotions out of shame. Let it out wherever you are and fuck everyone else. I don't trust anybody who doesn't occasionally cry. That's sociopath behavior.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Doesn’t matter if he was normative or not.

There’s no excuse for treating someone like shit for having real emotions that harmed absolutely nobody.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh hey look, the new ann coulter proposal video just droppe... And, he called it off.

Just think of the fucking human sludge it would take to propose to ann coulter in the first place, and then realize that those dudes STILL couldn't go through with it. They got one full whiff and said, "LOOK lady... I literally pay millions of dollars to hunt human children for fun in Luxembourg, I have a Michelin chef flown in to prepare their livers for me for dinner... but YOU are just a god damn irredeemable monster... I can't go through with this..."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Oooh snapz 🤣

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 weeks ago

I love Anne Coulter tried to call him weird and then had to delete her Tweet because making fun of kids it's actually the weird thing.

[–] [email protected] 78 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

Don't listen to the "we didn't know he had a disability" crowd. They knew what they were doing.

Give them a few terms in power and that kid advances from "having a disability" to "being euthanised for the good of the nation".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Isn't that a post birth abortion?

[–] [email protected] 73 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm more irritated that so many people use his disability as an "excuse." If he were the most average, neurotypical boy in the world, it would still be perfectly normal and acceptable to get excited and emotional about his father potentially being the next vice president.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Maybe, maybe not.

It’s irrelevant because that’s not what happened.

I get what you’re saying, but I find comparisons like this - although founded in fairness- to be ultimately unhelpful because they draw consideration away from what did happen: bullying and otherism. This isn’t about what might have been, it’s about what happened. And we can say how it would have been unacceptable under this or that circumstance, but that, I feel, detracts from us all uniting behind saying that THIS, under THESE circumstances was wrong.

I’m not trying to criticize you at all, your intentions are good here. I just don’t think that we should lose focus of criticizing the bullies for the reason why they were bullying in the first place. They were bullying this kid because he is different. Because he is an other. If he wasn’t, they probably would not have, or they would not have attacked his otherness.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The person you replied to wasn't disagreeing that they would bully him for being different. I just see them as saying no matter who or how someone is it should be ok for anyone to cry while being proud of their parent. I wish I could cry for being proud of mine but they're on the other side and probably mocked him as well.

I don't think you need to try to be dismissive of the commenters opinion, it's perfectly valid just as yours and mine. You can get yours out without having to say "I think you're wrong." Anyways 3rd party perspective over.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I wasn’t dismissing or even criticizing them— I think you misunderstood my comment.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well not to be overly pedantic just because you say you're not trying to criticize them doesn't mean you weren't. As for your message it seems to be lasered focused the kid's level of ablelism which is a valid point but it doesn't invalidate the above comment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

If you’re claiming to know my intentions and thoughts better than I, myself, do, then I suggest you open a psychic hotline.

Otherwise, perhaps acknowledge that, perhaps, you might just be wrong.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Instead republicans cry when the oligarchs take all their money via inflation and increased housing costs

All this culture nonsense is such a distraction

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

Excellent. The press have a story they can jump up and down on for a day or two and leave Harris alone.

Excellent work, Gus. You did good a hundred different ways, sir.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, Republicans are usually deep in the throes of toxic masculinity these days, so as shitty as it is that they’re responding this way, it’s not surprising.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›