this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
461 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2595 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The list of banned books is here

Read em while you can

(page 2) 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (12 children)

Sigh. Way to guarantee all the young adults are going to read the Twilight of shitty vanilla fairy melodramas.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Gd inbreds.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Fake news!

You’re allowed to read them, it just has to be inside a dark bag with only magical stones for illumination.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 93 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Implementation guidelines say that banned materials must be “legally disposed of” and “may not be sold or distributed”.

So, a book burning. Got it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Fucking imbeciles.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

While I hate this, I'm left wondering why we even mention the authors gender.

Is it to indicate that lawmakers go against women's freedoms?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes. A lot of book bans have been focused on books written by women and minorities.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"so, any progress on the school shooting problem?"

"nah, we needed to fix the superfudge problem. now we're going to work on the pokemon problem. it doesn't glorify god!"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

Pokemon don't evolve! They become more intelligently designed!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Banning fairy porn will fix all of society's ills.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Its not even very spicy fairy porn, if I am remembering right. Been a few years since I read the series.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

That list is 13 books by 7 authors.

Not good, but the summary is wrong.

Edit: the article needs some proof reading

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Yeah. An editor checking the headline would help.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago

FFS Utah, your lucky you have pretty rocks, but you got to knock this shit off.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Outlaw Utah. Call it a day.

[–] [email protected] 128 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Free speech in USA is a joke, it's both poorly protected and poorly regulated at the same time. Worst of both worlds!

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So. I have this... Stance. Humanity has at no point evolved past tribalism. We all live in tribes. The tribe with the most power waxes poetic about the importance of free speech, but the truth is, they only allow as much free speech as allows their tribe to maintain their position. All the rest of our tribes can squabble over whatever remaining scraps of power are left after the controlling tribe is full up.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's certainly true for some people.

But I don't see the Democrats out there banning books.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Speak for yourself. I'm all for banning ghostwritten books by conservative talking heads so they can launder money and game bestseller lists.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Why can't we ever get rid of fascists? Every generation they try the same crap and get away with it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why can't we ever get rid of fascists?

I believe this is where the second amendment comes in.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

I suspect it’s just a personality type. Maybe we could use eugenics to get rid of this undesirable trait. Oh wait. Dammit

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago

Because the same people taking away the rights are the ones saying that we can't retaliate for taking away our rights.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 3 months ago (2 children)

WHAT.THE.FUCK.

Motherfuckin' can't read 'Superfudge' in Utah anymore? This is truly the darkest timeline.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

It's listed in the article. It's "Forever" by Judy Blume. Not sure that I'm familiar with it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Really? I assumed it would be Are You There God it's Me Margaret. What could they possibly find offensive about Superfudge?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What could they be against a book that mentions God in the title?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It's about a girl and her friends discussing menstruation, and wishing they could menstruate, and being jealous of other girls who already menstruate, and praying to God that they menstruate soon. I can see where that would frighten pearl clutchers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Rhetorical! Thanks for the answer reminding us how against women these fuckers are though!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Tbf in not sure if.its against women or against bodily functions. I assume they'd probably have issues with a similar book about male puberty.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

The people banning it are against books about Menstruation...........which women do...........

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

"An entire book about a girl asking if God is there!? What a waste of time! The answer is 'Yes, God is there.'. We just saved you like 10 hours! (Though sometimes he may let you suffer or die without ever showing himself. But he's a silly ole God, and it was probably for your own good anyways.)"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

"Sometimes"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

If it takes you ten hours to read a Judy Blume book, that might be why you’re banning books.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

“I’m gonna need you to step back about 20 paces there… You’re talkin’ about a woman, reading?”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Whoa whoa whoa...women can read??????

WHAT IN THE ACTUAL FUCK! I'VE BEEN LIED TO. CAN THEY ALSO VOTE AND BE OUT IN PUBLIC?????

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›