this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
523 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18852 readers
4179 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

The words we've been using before -- fascists, neonazis, dictators -- oddly enough seem to make Republicans laugh at Democrats because we make them sound scary/we sound scared. Calling them weird trivializes them, and reduces them to barely under creepy uncle status. Calling them weird stings because they think themselves the epitome of normal -- they think they're the "real" Americans, not the aberrant ones.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Because it is simple and understandable.

Because it renders their grievances in the petty light they need to be seen in.

Because it hits a nerve for them.

Because it disempowers and dismisses them.

Because it's not overtly combative.

But really really because it is true.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Weird works for some people as it allows them to express disdain without getting violent

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think the main reason the "weird" approach works is simply because it is true. They are weird.

And the reason why it hurts Trump so much is exactly that truth hurts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I mean it's not like it was untrue to call him a rapist or wannabe dictator

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Soooo, I kind of got déjà vu reading this article because ... Six days ago I "foresaw" the relevance of "weird." Comment thread here (I think) or just check out post my post history.

The author brings up a ton of specific points I called out, including using similar words like "flip" the script and referencing how "basket of deplorables" was too directed. Were we all thinking sbout "weird" in this context six days ago already? If not... I am weirded out, y'all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

"Deplorables" and alot of other seemingly insulting, derogatory things could be worn as a badge of honor by that group. For people who pride themselves on being conservative and the representatives of "normality", "Weird" isn't something you can easily call yourself, you're not weird, you're the normal one, it's society that's weird for being so permissive. And then just being called "weird" is hard to defend against because everyone has some weird thing about themselves, just existing as a human being is a weird experience.

Weird isn't bad, weird is just normal, it's just life, but in their eyes, weird IS bad, it's probably a part of themselves that they themselves know is wrong. I think alot of the blatant lies they tell the world aren't just for other people, part of it is for themselves too, to make the weirdness of fascism go down a bit easier, to make it seem like they're supporting it for justifiable reasons.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

i maintain that this is because Kendrick Lamar thoroughly undermined Drake earlier this summer with a similar approach

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“Weird” reverses and intervenes at the crucial point of transmission of that idea. No, it says, the appeals by the right to supposed family values (anti-trans bigotry; restricting no-fault divorce; slashing public school funding; hatred of immigrants) are not normal. They aren’t fundamental American values that the liberal elites have somehow derailed. They are, instead, deeply strange. And “we” (a new silent majority that Walz invokes in his use of “weird”) are tired of it.

This sums it up pretty nicely.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why aren't there rolls of stickers on Amazon of pictures of Republicans with the word "weird" under them to stick on gas pumps?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

How are you any less weird? You support Zionism, just like many Republicans. You are SO WEIRD! Why aren't there rolls of stickers like that for you, @[email protected], and for all the other genocide deniers?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Probably because liberals are less likely to vandalize people's property, and buy a roll of stickers. You could probably make more money on large format stickers individually.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I absolutely wouldn't want to vandalize someone's property however, had a conservative already put a sticker there I wouldn't feel bad at all about covering it up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Vandalize someone's property

Just to make sure I understand

Vandalize = stick a removable sticker to something

Someone = an oil company

Property = infrastructure to dispense oil to be burned and pumped into the atmosphere

Honestly, I don't think stickers go nearly far enough. Bomb an oil pipeline instead.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah that won't kill anybody. F*** over society and raise the prices for 99% of people. That seems like a perfectly well thought-out plan /s

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Sounds like an opportunity to make some money. You could be the change you want to see.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Same reason they buy unnecessary giant trucks.

It isn't for loading their junk around.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Silent? They never shut the fuck up.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I think pretending there are A LOT of people like you that want this specific thing that is kind of weird is an attempt to appeal to authority of slightly more invested in politics "masses". If someone tells a conservative and disconnected corn farmer that ALL conservatives care about that trans thing and that it's a danger to your style of life, and that they mutilate children, then they might not check if any of that is true. Just assume that someone did, since apparently all their conservative friends are in on it. And you might just make a fool out of yourself if you ask any questions, since you know you don't really belong with "silent conservative majority" because unlike them you're not invested in politics and didn't do your research... So you better keep your mouth shut and go along with the flow. Same thing with facism. Also preys on embarassed ignorance of the "silent majority" ...imo

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The silent majority is neither of those things.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Yells. Screams. Smashes plate on the floor. Smashes plate against the wall. Flings boogers at everyone. Pulls out a gun and literally shoots somebody in the face. "Nobody is paying attention to me. I am the silent majority."

load more comments
view more: next ›