this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
341 points (90.5% liked)

politics

19050 readers
3882 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 56 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

I love Buttigieg, would definitely vote for him, but this would make me anxious. We already have black woman running and there are a lot of people in swing states that have a problem with just that.

I just want to be sure that the fascist criminal will lose.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (8 children)

But he's a veteran. Would they vote for the cop + veteran ticket or the felon + coach fucker one?

Time to show their true colors.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We absolutely are, but not as the VP to a non-white woman. The US has a long way to go.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago

Yeah, we are... but it ain't you.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Sure dude, but no offense, I'm hoping for the war veteran, swing state astronaut. Strategically he looks like the best choice IMO.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I liked him too until I found out it would prompt a special election that Democrats could likely lose

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (5 children)

He's a sitting senator of a red leaning state who won because of who he is. He has to vacate to run for VP, which is bad for keeping that seat. Losing the senate easily hamstrings any efforts a President Harris would bring, especially with GOP being the way they are.

Granted, that can be a problem for all swing state guys. Just isn't as terrible for governors (although that can screw with other things, like voting rights in a given state).

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

That resume is hard to top... isn't it? I keep reading other candidates but always find myself going "that's cool and all... but an astronaut?"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Sadly, not the US.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Until ~##,### voters don't decide an entire presidential election, no. No, they aren't...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

The question is how many of those voters would vote on a Democratic ticket led by a black woman in the first place. One of the most common errors in politics is trying to go after the core voters of the other side - usually framed as going after the moderates - instead of mobilising their own base. One of things that makes Trump dangerous is that he makes no such mistake.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As long as he does not fuck couches.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They really are not. A gay candidate will guarantee a loss through the midwest and south. Generally all the religious votes.

You think PizzaGate was bad? Wait until you have a gay candidate.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Honestly, I thought the same thing about Obama. I didn't think there was any way a black guy who'd been living in Chicago would win. But he did! You never know!

Though I agree that the risk would be crazy high to run a black/Indian female president with a gay vice president. Maybe not this psycho election.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Obama is literally the most professional and well spoken president since Clinton or JFK, possibly FDR. Like people he knew when he was younger were impressed with his ability.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

As a Massachusan I applaud your description of JFK as being well spoken. Too often does our nonrhotic profanity laiden dialect end up being maligned. It's a wicked fucking tragedy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Never underestimate how much people really fucking hate Trump

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Never overestimate either.

People had a rare situation where they could compare trump and Biden presidency side by side and still were saying that they are not sure who they will vote for.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That has nothing to do with how many people hate Trump. That had to do with how many people didn’t like Biden.

In case you hadn’t heard, Biden isn’t running for president anymore.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The Biden hate was artificially manufactured. Similar techniques will be used against anyone else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 97 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Who the fuck cares if they're black white gay straight trans, just so the fucking job well. That's all anyone wants.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Which is why the do-nothing Secretary of Transportation and McKinsey grad who got the job to repay a favor is the wrong choice.

If anything, it could be awful for LGBTQ+ people if the first representation in the White House is a corporatist small town mayor who keeps failing upwards.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Unfortunately, many or most people.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oooohhhh, a lot of people reeeaaaally care. They shouldn’t, but they really do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, the ones with mental health issues.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

So... No Republicans. Got it.

[–] [email protected] 159 points 2 months ago (11 children)

Who the fuck cares

Aww, you’ve never met a republican, huh?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago

I have. And I'm telling them to get over it and not care. Even though I know they're too mentally unstable to accept the feedback.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›