this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
346 points (98.3% liked)

politics

18789 readers
2873 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You already pay more taxes if you don't have children... (child tax credits, dependents in household, etc)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

But not in a way that financially coerces you to have children, which is what Vance wants

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah. The new class war. Parents vs the childless. What bullshit

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

So I just have to impregnate a bunch of women and I get to live for free right? What's the America that JD Vance wants?

They have completely flipped around. They are now the welfare Queens. They are the triggered snowflakes. They are the one's calling for defunding law enforcement.

It's almost like they stand for absolutely nothing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I thought they stood for a god-king theocracy type of dystopia where they rule but are never ruled.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is literally already the case. Parents get tax deductions.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

He's calling for a world where people are more or less coerced into having children by punitive taxes if they don't have any.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

How about since he views parents as having more of a stake in americas future, they can pay extra taxes. Why the fuck would anybody pay more taxes for less representation, not that we have much anyway for what we already do pay.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Considering that parents get a Child Tax Credit ($2,000 per child I think?) and I pay property taxes to fund public schools (I don't mind) I'd say I'm already being taxed in order to subsidize other people's children

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

I have no problem paying to subsidize children (regardless of who their parents are, children aren't property), because I care about the future of this country and those children will run this country one day. I just don't want the law written to punish me for not having kids, especially not when they're talking about taking my voting rights away over it.

Give parents a bigger tax credit. Increase taxes for schools. Throw as much money at the children as you want, I won't complain, I'll keep paying my share and will celebrate a society that actually prioritizes outcomes for all children, instead of just children of wealthy parents.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Just remember JD doesn’t think you’re pulling your fair share.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

Government so small it can only oppress the poor and middle class.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

The only kind of ideas he's known for.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

God damn lol.

Trump never had this douche-canoe vetted, and it shows with horrible clip after horrible clip just pouring out.

I feel for the Harris campaign staffers who have to listen to hours apon hours of his podcast horror shows, but they are doing the lords work. This stuff is campaign gold.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Peter Thiel has been pimping this edgelad out to every single political vacuum he can find, and Vance has magnificently fucked up every place he's been put, so here's hoping the trend continues!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Or he did. It the people vetting him (including Trump) like is entirely unamerican ideas.

What’s hilarious we already pay more in taxes anyway. (We get substantially fewer deductions, for example.)

I say unamerican because he wants to give parents more voting power with more kids

load more comments
view more: next ›