this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
567 points (98.8% liked)

politics

18789 readers
2741 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived copies of the article: archive.today ghostarchive.org web.archive.org

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Watch him try to deny it, like Austin Powers trying to deny that the Swedish penis pump was his, until they also bring out the "Swedish penis pumps are my bag, baby, by Austin Powers" book with a photo of him on the cover.

Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pJXNJfb3yk

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

As Trump desperately tries to separate his campaign from Project 2025, users on X have noted one big problem: J.D. Vance wrote the foreword to a forthcoming book by the plan’s lead author, Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts.

On the Amazon product page, the promotional material for the book, titled Dawn’s Early Light, highlights Roberts’s role in composing Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation proposal for a conservative overhaul of the federal government.

The product page also includes a favorable review from Vance. “Never before has a figure with Roberts’s depth and stature within the American Right tried to articulate a genuinely new future for conservatism,” the review says. “We are now all realizing that it’s time to circle the wagons and load the muskets. In the fights that lay ahead, these ideas are an essential weapon.”

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago

On the Amazon product page, the promotional material for the book, titled Dawn’s Early Light, highlights Roberts’s role in composing Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation proposal for a ~~conservative~~ fascist overhaul of the federal government.

FTFY.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Trump, undoubtedly aware of the plan’s growing unpopularity, has claimed, “I know nothing about Project 2025” and that “some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal.”

How does he know things in it are abysmal if he has no knowledge of it?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I realize this is just my brain struggling desperately to pattern match and make sense of something that doesn't, like seeing faces in white noise on a TV. But "they" could be the people saying things about Project 2025, not the fascist propaganda itself.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Semi brain dead orange man

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (4 children)

He really does lay the eyeliner on thick

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

That and seeing him without a beard is all the information anyone ever needs about J.D. Vance.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Like, it looks good on him, but for someone whose party is so angry about men wearing makeup it’s definitely a choice

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

It’s tattooed on.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

No shit. It looks like someone is a little curious... I wonder if his project 2025 involves a closet?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago

So trump chose a fascist VP? SHOCK!!!!! /s

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Andy Beshear is the exact opposite of JD Vance. He’s an authentic, decent person who can speak to rural communities and purple states with sincerity, the one thing that is truly lacking in American politics.

I know Shapiro is the conventional wisdom pick, but Beshear is the right pick.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mark Kelly seems like the right pick to me, he's got the overview effect and has unique experiences and leadership, already has experience in the Senate which is their main job, can probably take his swing state blue, and his seat can be easily replaced.

Shapiro is too pro-Netanyahu IMO, I'm neutral on Beshear, but his seat isn't as easily replaceable, and losing a democratic governor would suck, and he might not take the state blue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I like Kelly as a VP pick, but I don’t like turning a safe senate seat into a tossup. Beshear is term limited, so his lieutenant governor can finish the term and run as an incumbent.

I think they’re probably going with Shapiro, though. The old guard will see Pennsylvania turning blue and put their blinders on to everything else.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If Kelly gets the VP, the democratic governor of Arizona gets to pick his replacement, it's not a special election or a tossup!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I believe it would mean a special election in Arizona during the 2026 midterms. That’s a concern.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

the right pick

beg pardon, the right pick for what?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

They mentioned Shapiro, so VP.

load more comments
view more: next ›