Why did the media so quickly forget Trumps quid pro quo with the oil industry for a billion dollars. IANAL but isn’t that a blatant crime?
this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
352 points (98.4% liked)
News
23287 readers
3398 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Saving me n other people a click
You mean like his other 9 million blatant felonies, for which he received no punishment?
I think I have a new found respect for Biden. This is easily one of the best power plays of all time. Stepping down must have been tough, especially if he couldn’t remember why he should step down.
Oh, Joe Biden still knows what he is doing, unlike the orange felon/rapist who spews bullshit and lies non-stop.
The mind and body may go, but the heart remains. He sacrificed his own aspirations to give Kamala the best possible chance of burying Trump. Legendary final chapter, 10/10, would vote Dem again.
It's kinda insane to me that any presidential candidate is pulling in 81 million dollars. Why do they possibly need that much money for campaigning? It seems absurd.
It seems crazy to me too. The limits on spending for election campaigns are far smaller in some other countries, even after adjusting for population size.
Without passing judgment on whether it's wise or not (though... clearly the current paradigm is not), the legal rationale is that the free speech implications of the US Constitution's first amendment are extremely broad and permissive, even more so for explicitly political speech, and that money spent on political campaigns is effectively money spent to disseminate political speech. Restrictions therefore are very few, very light, and even where they exist they are very easy to effectively work around while remaining legal.
To add to others, they also have to run field offices in so many places, especially battlegrounds. It's not just ads, you need locals.
Imagine opening up 50+ offices in each major European nation, staffed with both volunteers and paid folk.
America is huge, and the sheer number of media - social media, cable, network TV, streaming, radio, newspaper, magazines, internet, and so on - means that if you want to reach people, a little more money will always reach additional audiences.
From there, it's just an arm's race with no upper limit, since each party is desperate to not let the other out-message them.
Perhaps there should be an upper limit.
Please think of the media owner billionaires enjoying the most privileged and luxurious life that earth has to offer.
They need that money desperately, because it's not enough for them to win, they require that everyone else be as miserable as they are.
American campaigns are so long
To be fair kamala's is relatively short with this late of a start.
They needn't be, and even considering that, I can't fathom justifying 81 million dollars for a presidential campaign. It's actually unconscionable to me.
You think that's too much? That's a drop in the bucket.
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/most-expensive-election-ever
Aw heck, maybe I'll even kick in a couple bucks
maybe I’ll even kick in a couple bucks
musk is kicking in millions so millions need to kick in a few bucks or musk will rule you.
You know, someone out there is counting the number of donators as well as the total, so your little chip has value there. Mine's in.
Democracy and decency thanks you.
Ka-Moolah
Rakin’ in da bux.