this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
94 points (91.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27456 readers
1175 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On accident

I kind of can't take people seriously when they say On accident, I don't know or care if its more or less grammatical, it sounds like a child sputtering in my mind. It should be By accident or accidentally

Tummy

Any adult has zero business saying this lol

(page 4) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

I get annoyed at people who wait at pedestrian crossings but never push the button.

Are they waiting for someone else to push it because it’s beneath them? Do they think it has cooties? Do they secretly not want to reach their destination? Do they think the buttons are fake, and traffic engineers are waiting to laugh at them on hidden cameras?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Proper usage of ‘s.

Guy joined my team a few years ago and uses ‘s for literally everything, and now most of the team does it too.

It bothers me every time, and I’ve typed corrections into the message box so many times but never hit send.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think it's mostly that particularly poor common grammar drives me nuts. Like, there's no excuse to not know the difference between you're and your. Once could be a mistake or a typo, but if it's a pattern of behavior you're just not trying. Get your shit together. :)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I definitely judge people on grammar and spelling. If you can’t be bothered to learn your native language, then I can’t be bothered to decode your shitty writing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (3 children)

People who think anyone uses literally to mean figuratively are annoying and too caught up in their crusade to realize their take is idiotic. No one uses it to mean figuratively. People use it to emphasize regardless of the figurative nature of language. It's semantic drift that happens to most words that mean something similar to "in actuality" (e.g. really, actually). Even in other languages.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think the definition has even been updated to reflect this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Yeah. Dictionaries reflect popular usage. And I think literally has probably been in use in that sense nearly as long as it's been used to mean something really did happen that way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Germany did not invent döner kebap and it's insane that they claim that. Anyone who insists on it displays a tragic lack of understanding about what a kebab even is and should be ashamed of themselves.

What they did invent is their own way of preparing and serving döner kebab, an existing dish that is itself a variation of other existing dishes that came before it. In the kebab world, that's not only allowed but also basically encouraged. Everyone is welcome to modify dishes to their heart's desire. There are countless kebab dishes in Turkish cuisine that are nothing more than slight variations on existing dishes. What you should do after creating your own variant, however, is to also give it your own name to mark the difference. That's what the Germans have not done. They're continuing to use the name of a dish they did not invent. That's a bit of a dick move. Seriously, look up Adana kebab and Urfa kebab. They're essentially the exact same thing except one is hot and the other is not. Yet they have different names, because that's how it's done.

The German döner kebab is a distinctly different thing than the "real" döner kebab. According to the long standing kebab traditions, it must be given its own name. Otherwise no, döner kebab was most certainly not invented in Germany. Name it something else and make a proper claim. It would even help enrich your exceptionally poor and boring cuisine a little bit.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

By Germans you mean ethnic Turks who made it and marketed it as such to ethnic germans?

I mean I get your point but the naming here is part of marketing IMHO German Turks made it for local market while keep "exotic" name

Rebranding at this stage is futile lol this thing is more popular prolly than the Turkish original lol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

It is true that it was a Turk that marketed it as such, but it's mostly the Germans that are so insistent on claiming it's a German invention. The only Turks I've seen that weren't largely indifferent were those who made and sold the stuff, but even the non-döner-worker Germans can be weirdly militant about it especially after a few drinks.

In any case, why it was named that is irrelevant to the point. Which is that we're being pedantic in this thread and, strictly speaking, the name is wrong. It is in gross violation of the unwritten döner naming conventions. But obviously I'm not holding my breath for any official rebranding.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

More like pet peeves, and not something I'd lose my sleep over, but they're hilariously pedantic. I'll focus on Latin because I'd rather not pick on existing linguistic communities.

⟨V⟩ and ⟨U⟩ are not different letters in Latin. Deal with it. The "right" way to use them is like this:

  • Upper case - ⟨V⟩, always
  • Lower case - ⟨u⟩ or ⟨v⟩, pick one, but don't mix them

People fāiling to follow the əbove ɑre æs ənnoying æs someone insistently respelling English ⟨A⟩ with rændom junk bāsed on the sound. Like I æm doing now.

Same deal with ⟨I⟩ vs. ⟨J⟩. J'm not gojng to stop you from dojng so, but you can almost hear my "tsk, tsk, tsk" from a djstance.

There's one way to pronounce Latin ⟨C⟩. It's /k/ (as in "skill"). If you use /tʃ/ (as in "chimp"), /ʃ/ (as in "shampoo"), /ts/ (as in "cats"), /s/ (as in "silly"), you're doing it wrong. Unless you're handling Late Latin, but then follow some consistent set of rules dammit, not just "I use Latin like the Church does".

"Veni, uidi, uici" is supposed to be pronounced ['we:ni: 'wi:di: wi:ki:]; or roughly "WAY-nee WEE-dee WEE-kee". Once you pronounce it with random stuff like "vany VD vaitchy", you're wrecking all its alliterative appeal.

Speaking on that, Brutus is an unsung hero for going all stab-stabby against the guy who said the above. A shame that nobody did it against his adoptive child.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

A power supply, the thing that gets plugged into AC mains power and outputs some sort of DC (usually USB now) to power electronics is not a "charger". It (usually) doesn't know anything about charging batteries, and connecting its output directly to a Li-ion battery would lead to an explosion. The charger is integrated into the device receiving that power.

"Portable battery" is a terrible term to describe a USB powerbank. Thousands of battery types are portable, but don't have USB ports or output exactly the right voltage. Some powerbanks are sold without batteries.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

My kid calls USB cables “chargers”. My sister witnessed this for the first time, turned to me (known techie and pedant) and was like “You’re okay with this?”

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

The way most people in my region pronounce the words "jewelry" and "realtor" really annoys me. I'm in the tiny minority who pronounces them the way I do, so I never say anything. But the locals almost all add a "LUH" to the middle. It's an extra syllable that just isn't in the spelling.

They say jew-LUH-ree and ree-LUH-ter. I pronounce these jewel-ree and reel-ter. I'm absolutely delighted when I hear someone say them the "correct" way, like I do.

Similar thing for how most around here say the year. When people say "two thousand and twenty-four" it grinds my gears. Just say "twenty twenty-four", FFS.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Do you consider your reeltor more correct than re-ul-tor?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Ree-ul-tor is fine. It's people who say "rea-LUH-tor" that sound wrong to my ears. They put the "L" in the wrong place.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'll even accept "joolry".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I have a friend that pronounces it as "jury".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Ha! How much time have you got?

Shallow and pedantic is my speciality.

But for the sake of brevity I'll simply say that hearing (or reading) less in cases where fewer would be more appropriate is like driving an ice pick into my brain.

Yes...both are technically correct, but I have to fight the urge to be that guy whenever I hear it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They're not interchangeable. 'Fewer' is for countable nouns and 'less' is for aggregate nouns, just like 'how many' and 'how much'.

E.g:

Aggregate:

"How much sand? Less sand."

Countable:

"How many grains of sand? Fewer grains of sand."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh believe me, I know. I agree.

but the argument nowadays is that common usage dictates that both are now "acceptable", similar to how apparently "literally" now effectively means "figuratively" because everyone uses it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Along with that, I'll add in "number" vs "amount":

  • A shocking number of people get this wrong (countable)
  • The amount of confusion about it is distressing (aggregate)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Socks and slides is only acceptable footwear for taking the bin to the kerb or checking the mailbox. If you're wearing them in public I immediately assume you are a classless dumbass and your opinion on anything is irrelevant.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

I feel attacked

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I choose socks and sandals over proper footwear in order to demonstrate this. It keeps people's expectations lower and makes life easier.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Sometimes I just wanna wear an outfit that makes people laugh and smile...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

This is fair.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Agree, same with wearing sweatpants, if you are not doing actual sporting activities

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›