this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
267 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4186 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

No wonder they call him Hunter, shots fucking fired.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

I wonder how many people are doing time right now who should be free on this basis.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oooh, the redhats aren't gonna like this one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

This is something his dad should be doing

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Literally Big Dick energy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

In that Trump is a big dick. It works on multiple levels!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I hope this is just the first salvo the Biden's launch and start using all the ridiculous policies the GOP is setting against them.

I am middle of the road but registered democrat. I vote for who I think will do the best job in local and national elections.

I am partially paralyzed and it takes me 1/2 a day to vote. I will always vote because its all we have imo.

IMO The Electoral college stole the election from Hillary but you don't see her running around like Kari Lake who is acting this way on purpose so if Trump wins, she will get appointed to a good job in his cabinet.

Back to Hillary, She won the popular vote by millions and still lost!

This is what the electoral college did

She won the popular vote just short of 3 Million!

Back then we had **249,372,406 people over the age of 18. About 80% of them were eligible to vote

That is roughly 200k people. 199,497,924. The point is the amount of popular votes should have been a solid win. Not a landslide but solid.

This makes me very sketched out along with all these new voting districts and restrictions on absentee ballots,

and some states banning giving people in line a bottle of water or food! Google line warming!

What if Biden wins by 2 million? Is that a solid win for Trump???

**Child and Adult Populations 2016

Age 18 and over

United States 249,372,462

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yes, democrats have to win by a landslide in order to squeak out a victory. Meanwhile, republicans can lose over and over and over and still rise to power. No republican has ever entered the presidency by winning the popular vote in my entire lifetime.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Culturally speaking we already won, politically speaking, the Right won't take a fucking hint and they don't have to because to Democrats unrigging the game would be as wrong as rigging it in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure how old you are, but George Bush won the popular vote in 2004. That was the last time a Republican won the popular vote.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He did not enter the presidency with that election.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Good point, I misread your original comment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That is roughly 200k people. 199,497,924.

I think you may have meant 200M, or you have 3 extra numbers and a comma that don't belong lol.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

He meant a period instead of the 2nd comma. 0.924 extra people voted for Hillary

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Wasn't that ruling only for POTUS? Like if Biden drone striked a caravan of terrorists and it took out a US civilian on accident he's not facing murder charges.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The Supreme Court has been upending a lot recently, it's giving me whiplash just keeping up with every decision. As others have pointed out, this is because of how the appointment of the special council was made, which is how Trump's stolen classified documents case was thrown out in court this week. It seems that in the judicial system bending over backwards for Trump, they failed to consider 25 years of precedence and the ramifications to people other than Trump.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sweet, honest question == downvotes. Classic Lemmy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Is it though?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

Judge Cannon in the classified documents case just threw out the case saying that the DOJ can't appoint special counsel and so Trump shouldn't have been indicted by Jack Smith. Hunter was indicated by a special counsel and so he's trying to say that he shouldn't have been indicted either.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago

Now that Trump ruling. The other Trump ruling.

Where Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the Mar-a-Lago documents case because the Special Prosecutor was “unlawfully appointed”.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Not the newest one, it was dismissed on the basis of how the special counsel was appointed.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 months ago

As he should.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago

“No, not like that!” 😆

[–] [email protected] 103 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"Your honor, I'd like to cite 'What's good for the goose, is good for the gander.' for my case."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Except any court would reject that outright because you haven't done it in Latin

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

Quid pro.... goosius maximus

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

But, the good of the scorpion is not the good of the frog, yes?