this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
302 points (99.3% liked)

News

30656 readers
3229 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Justice Department is aggressively prioritizing efforts to strip some Americans of their U.S. citizenship.

Department leadership is directing its attorneys to prioritize denaturalization in cases involving naturalized citizens who commit certain crimes — and giving district attorneys wider discretion on when to pursue this tactic, according to a June 11 memo published online. The move is aimed at U.S. citizens who were not born in the country; according to data from 2023, close to 25 million immigrants were naturalized citizens.

The focus on denaturalization is just the latest step by the Trump administration to reshape the nation's immigration system across all levels of government, turning it into a major focus across multiple federal agencies. That has come with redefining who is let into the United States or has the right to be an American. Since his return to office, the president has sought to end birthright citizenship and scale back refugee programs.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

This is to ensure they remove Zohran first.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

As a naturalized citizen:

Bouta be stateless, since my birth country doesn't do dual citizenship. Thanks a lot, Xi 🙃 (not that I would like it there anyways)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

I wonder how this works. In the Netherlands we don't take away citizenship from naturalized citizens if they gave up all other citizenships.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Poor Melania, we all see where this is headed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

At least if she's deported she can't be buried at Trump's golf course.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 39 minutes ago)

I still found that crazy. Bury your kids mother (your ex wife) on a golf course, extremely underwhelming grave for a "billionaire" and then somehow not have it mowed when you are hosting an international tournament. Like they had to mow the golf course, the landscaping company is clearly already being paid....

[–] [email protected] 23 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I am a straight white upper middle class American citizen, son of two straight white upper middle class American citizens.

I am almost exactly who the GOP says they like the most.. EXCEPT I am a liberal atheist.

And STILL I am just waiting for the day when the administration announces a new class of people they are targeting and somehow I get wrapped up in it eventually.

They are coming for anyone who is not them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Same. One day they are going after the pot smokers and I'm screwed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago

Remember, it's not paranoia if they're really after you.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

this is beyond terrifying.

how every American can be treated like those "illegal immigrants ", and anyone could be snatched, denationalised, and sent to a concentration camp to an undisclosed country. they'll make sure to delete any documentation, so when this is all over, those disappeared might not be found and left to rot in a slave camp.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

yhea, straight up,

there's even an ethnic cleansing in the US.

it's no longer 'this is going to be like...' it already is.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I think that revoking a citizen's citizenship should only be decidable by the supreme court, and there needs to be a new trial for every single time the DOJ tries to revoke the citizenship of a citizen.

I think that because that means every triaé must be taken very seriously, and there cannot be summary revocations.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Sadly, that wouldn't help currently. "Citizenship revoked, 6-3" over and over again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

As corrupt as they are, its still better chance than 1 man deciding it.

Wong Kim Ark decision happened around the same time as the "Separate But Equal" pro-segregation ruling happened, just to give some perspective.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 22 hours ago

Start with the illegal evil spawn of DJT, AKA King Taco

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago

It's meant to strip citizenship from those who may have lied about their criminal convictions or membership in illegal groups like the Nazi party, or communists during McCarthyism, on their citizenship applications.

While I disagree with denaturalization, I'd accept it if it meant that this reasoning became universal. If you lied while taking an oath that gives you special status, then your special status will be revoked.

Since virtually all Republican politicians lied in their oaths of office to defend the constitution, we could sue to have them removed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

It lists a whole bunch of reasonable things to prioritize, but then ends with:

Any other cases referred to the Civil Division that the Division determines to be sufficiently important to pursue.

[–] [email protected] 91 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Calling it right now: Mamdani's primaries win made this a priority and they wanna try to pressure him into stepping down, or just revoke his citizenship.

Any other citizens they hurt along the way are just little treats they give themselves for being such good little boys and ~~girls~~non-boys. ^(Gotta protect that research funding)^

[–] [email protected] 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

While I don't disagree with your sentiment, this memo was sent on June 11th, before the primary.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 14 hours ago

GREAT! WAY TO PROVE ME WRONG AND SHOW THAT YOU KNOW HOW TIME WORKS! EVERYONE LOOK AT HOW SMART THETETRAPOD IS, KNOWING THINGS AND STUFF!

For serious, though, good catch and thanks for calling me out on that. I was so hellbent on my rationalization that I didn't even consider that things could have happened in a different order or that dates could have had meaning. As much as I like to fly off the handle, I really appreciate y'all who keep me in check.

[–] [email protected] 157 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nazis gonna nazi. Citizenship should be immutable once gained. Especially if someone has revoked prior citizenship; you cannot leave someone stateless.

These fucking nazis running things are not people.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I disagree on a technicality. You should be able to give up your own citizenship.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

It depends on context.

Portugal only has one border, with Spain. Spain is much bigger in all ways, and they don't want people to be coerced into giving up their Portugese citizenship, so they made it impossible. I am basically okay with this

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago

Ok. yes. i agree there. i meant from the “state down”.