this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
698 points (99.0% liked)

politics

24555 readers
2868 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has said that he will withhold funding for New York City if presumptive Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani becomes mayor after November’s general election and doesn’t do the “right thing.”

(page 3) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

I would write this dude in for every election until I die if he responds, 'STFU!'

[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Good thing New York doesn’t need it and provides money for the federal government. It’s more like New York will stop till they get their shit together.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's time to dissolve the union.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 4 days ago (4 children)

This shows that waiting to 2026 and hoping that Dems will take over Congress is really pointless. They won't acknowledge and certify any results that aren't their people.

At this point we either fight or accept end of US as a democracy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 84 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Just FYI: withholding money is financial abuse, a favorite tactic of abusers, since it leaves no visible marks until significant damage is done.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago

I'm so tired of people not telling this old bunch of shit sacks to fuck off. I'd have so much respect for any threatened tRump victim if they just told him the fuck off after shits like that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I guess they'll have to withhold they're federal taxes to help pay for the shortfall.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

What a pathetic pile of garbage excuse for a human being. Just fuck off.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And we're right back to election interference. I wonder if something will be done about it this time.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

The problem with this, and so many other problems in America right now - is that they'll only ever be fixed by Democrats swinging the other direction.

The majority of whom will only go as far as they believe their corporate sponsors will allow. Preventing real progress.

This is the mechanism and economic base structure of "democracy" in the west which prevents real progress and real change from happening to the structures and systems we have.

The result? An ever increasing risk of populist fascism, which may become increasingly systemic in its use of deadly force and violent repression (yes, things can go further unless the structure itself is forced in the other direction - in a revolutionary manner).

To clarify: Only leftwing revolution can fix and prevent this happening again. Hence why Biden and establishment "leftists" were unable to prevent the current era - because it requires a revolutionary movement much further left to do these adjustments to democracy, rights, and the state of western politics.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

You can't get enough people to vote for your cause, but you can get enough people to fight and die for it?

Even if your vanguard does win, what do you do with the people who don't agree with your methods after the dust settles? What lengths will you go to I order to "protect" the revolution?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 146 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Lmao, damn, trump seems really scared of this guy.

All the conservatives seem really scared of this guy.

Wonder why republicans might be scared of Democratic candidates left of dead center. Almost like a real alternative not slobbering out neoliberal, Chicago school of economics, nonsense could sweep them in a lot of traditional safe seats.

Or at least be really hard to rally their base against if their base actually hears what the policies are.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well of course. He's charismatic, young and he talks to the people he wants to represent. He's the antithesis of everything they are.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 days ago (2 children)

With the current state of affairs, I’m worried he’s going to fall out of a window and shoot himself in the back of the head

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This sounds like more of the "socialism never works [because conservatives/capitalists sabotage it]"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 293 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Oh but blue states not giving federal taxes over is "starting a civil war."

The civil war is already happening. Wake the fuck up people.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Or it's not, and that's the problem. The organised rightwing forces of state repression can easily push around a left that's been trained and groomed to function as entirely beholden to corporate sponsors and big money donors.

...to the point it's now visible and blatant that the establishment left cannot stand and legitimately claim even the possibility they are the solution.

Because the solution is something more revolutionary that will cause bloodshed and more regular interruptions to people's daily lives.

So of course, keep your head down, hope none of this effects you. Ignore that it already has. The dems will fix it later, ect....

It's understandable to ignore the civil war even though it's not rational to.

Terrorists (freedom fighters) are made as needed, they're not born ready. Trump's administration will be looking to stay under that threshold.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago

I had the same reaction. The US has two parties, a far right one and a center right one. There are some center left members in the Democratic Party but the rest of the party sure tries to smother them any chance they get.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago

Viva la revolución

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 days ago (11 children)

Can someone share some insight with us non Americans, how close are you to a civil war? Between the LA protests and this it seems very imminent

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

There are only nine meals between mankind & anarchy. -Alfred H. Lewis

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

I think people are more pissed off and divided than they have been in a very long time. It's hard to say how close we are to a civil war, though. There's been a lot of propaganda for a long time saying "violence is not the answer" (even though sometimes it is), and "violence has no place in our system of government" (even though the government abuses its own monopoly on violence to imprison and kill innocent, peaceful people).

It feels like the media in the US is less reliable than it's ever been in my lifetime, and would probably suppress as much as possible any information that would support open rebellion.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

I am very skeptical of the notion we are anywhere near an actual shooting war despite all the turmoil. Both sides would have waaaay too much to lose, especially red states, which derive huge amounts of funding from blue states (basically, blue states provide federal revenue while red states tend to use it up).

At the moment at least, people have too high a degree of comfort to actually get off their asses and start physically fighting. Things would probably have to get a lot worse before we really see that happen.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

I predict with immigration crack downs we'll eventually see some more resistance to that. At some point, either by ambush or chance occurrence, ICE agents will be attacked and possibly killed. Trump will horrifically overstep in his response. Then it will just be escalating responses.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not very close, despite the online rhetoric. Life continues and our feudal lords play their games.

If things continue to get worse and another lunatic succeeds Trump, I think talk of secession will start to gain more traction in the West. But even then, it would take something really major (and not something the Lemmy politics crowd considers major, but something that actually snaps average liberals out of their comas) to garner enough support for it to actually occur.

Western secession would be an uphill battle; it's just as likely we'd lose an armed conflict with the rest of the country, and an all-out war would be absolutely terrifying.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean they’re arresting citizens with brown skin now so not too long before being a democratic registered voter is a crime.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

There likely won't be bloodshed until the president is assassinated.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Still seem very unlikely to start a war (plus, given his track record of would-be assassins, they'd probably be right wing anyhow).

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That won't matter. It could be Don Jr doing it live and on camera and it would still get spun an an anti-fa trans brown immigrant leftist plot and a certin 40% would believe it with their orange little hearts.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Not so sure about that, some certainly would, but even if it was disregarded by everyone, people are way too comfortable and complacent to give up their relative safety to start an actual war.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

At this point it's in the script

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's a "cold" civil war currently. And one side is just submitting and rolling over.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Eh, bread and circuses. People are still relatively comfortable and complacent.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago

Three missed paychecks, and we’ll be there.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Except we can barely afford the bread and circuses right now. This is true of people like me that 5 years ago thought they were doing really well…

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

Even impoverished Americans have a relatively high standard of living, globally speaking. People are struggling, but they generally have a roof over their heads and don't have to eat their pets. We're not where we should be by any measure, but we're also nowhere near the levels of desperation that push people to armed revolt.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›