this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
10 points (85.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43808 readers
889 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

i wouldn't normally be concerned since any company releasing a VR product with this price tag is obviously going to fail... but it's apple and somehow through exquisite branding and sleek design they have managed to create something that resonated with "tech reviewers" and rich folk who can afford it.

what's really concerning is that it's not marketed as a new VR headset, it's marketed by apple and these "tech reviewers" as the new iphone, something you take with you everywhere and do your daily tasks in, consume content in etc...

and it's dystopian. imagine you are watching youtube on this thing and when an ad shows up, you can't look away, even if you try to they can track your eye movement and just move the window, you can't mute it, you certainly cannot install adblock on it, you are forced to watch the ad until it satisfies apple or you just give up and take out the headset.

this is why i think all these tech giants (google meta apple etc) were/are interested in the "metaverse". it holds both your vision and your hearing hostage, you cannot do anything else when using it but to just use the thing. a 100% efficiency attention machine, completely blocking you from the outside world.

i'm not concerned about this iteration as much as people are not hyped about this iteration. just like how people are hyped about the next apple vision, i'm more worried about the next iterations with somewhat lower price tag and better software availability. i hope it flops and i know it probably won't achieve any sort of mainstream adoption even if it's deemed a success because it probably can't get less bulky and look less dorky, but the possibility is still worrying. what are your thoughts?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

giant companies try stupid marketing techniques like this all the time. when they're moronic and nobody can afford them, they fail.

I don't think I've seen a single normal tech reviewer that didn't talk about serious drawbacks to the platform. the only people who are sucking apple's dick are those frou-frou amalgamated tech click harvesters that always suck the big corporations' dicks. like the Verge

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just like how the iPod was the invention of the mp3 player.

The truth is society is really really malleable and stupid. That's just human nature. And of course it's going to be manipulated by people for power and wealth.

It'll go the same way as cable TV, and phones. It's the same exact path. We live within systems specifically created to market unneeded "wants". Just go outside and mingle with people... Some people literally seem like they have little humanity left in them, the just live for consumption. It's like addicts. It essentially is addiction for dopamine. Any product or nation/society that allows basically lawless marketing function will be the same.

So you're thoughts imo are accurate. BUT there's also another side of life. Once you stop falling for marketed bullshit and pop culture/media you can tune out all the bullshit. They will always prey on the weak. While I said all that keep in mind technology is like our civilizations pyramids or creation of democracy. Personally I have some hope in transhumanism, but you know pop news and marketing shit is going to make it all a divisive argument. Lol I'm probably doing that now. They do this partially as publicity and a advertising.

It's not about this or that it's about allowing growth of all things?

Idk... Just some rambling.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

We live within systems specifically created to market unneeded “wants”

Isn't it interesting that it's taught as supply and demand, and not demand and supply?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

People are going to use these things irresponsibly like when they're driving.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

My gf already sent me an instagram reel of just that and I wanted to just rip their new toy off their faces so bad.

This is the one, if you're interested.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The reality of the situation is going to be far more boring than anything you can make up in your mind. They said that AI was going to completely change the world and make normal work obsolete causing a bunch of people to lose their jobs. Turns out it was a total grift and only that last bit was true because the owning class are a bunch of useless fucks who genuinely thought they could get away with it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I mean you're worried about something you don't even use yet showing you ads... Your android/iPhone has a front facing camera and doesn't force you to watch the advert via eye tracking. No ones does, because you would just buy something else

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

someone should make a de-facebooked custom rom for the meta quest

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Apple will never do the ad eye tracking thing. And if they do? there’s this cool thing called taking the headset off. It’s not glued to your fucking face

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

I'm going to do your take but actually properly: Don't buy apple products.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If they are pushing ads that much, they will probably pause the ad until you put the device back on or close the application.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So don’t put it back on. It’s not magnetized to your face. How is this hard to understand?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Calm down gummy worm, I was just discussing a potential process that ad servers will probably take.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So Apple is good because… you can stop using it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Nobody said Apple was good, they're just noting that nobody is going to force you to use an Apple Vision product. You can go your whole life without putting one on if you like.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Nobody fucking said that except you, just now. What else will you fabricate from my comments?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

because it probably can’t get less bulky and look less dorky,

Airpods are probably one of the ugliest pieces of tech ove seen in the last decade and yet somehow it doesn't seem to matter. Never overestimate apple's customer base.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

They're pretty much the only company on the planet that can push the "because your friends have one" aspect in their marketing and succeed. Apple users think they're all part of this exclusive club and really don't care that they're straight up being robbed by the cost.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I don’t think they’re any uglier than other wireless earbuds. I think it’s kinda cute that they stuck with the iPod earbud look without the wires.

Not that I have AirPods. I’m a Jabra man myself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

At the risk of facts getting in the way:

  1. You can install ad blockers
  2. Apps are not able to do that
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I remember this being discussed when Apple first announced it because developers have to hand off graphics to the os so the os can do the divested rendering specifically because Apple didn’t want individual apps to be able to gather data about where users are looking.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Adguard home for built in encrypted DNS. Better UI (imo) and uses the same lists.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Never knew about it, thank you for teaching me something new)

load more comments
view more: next ›