this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
367 points (98.4% liked)

politics

23226 readers
3113 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

I already told my partner we can’t shop at target anymore because they gave into these fucks. Let me add more to the list.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fucking cowards, this is one reason Im jaded against anyone calling themselves an ally. The slightest pressure and they will turn

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago (10 children)

They aren’t cowards. They are legally obligated to make more profit for the shareholders. They couldn’t give a rats ass about anything else. Any public company showing “support” for pride is only doing it because they think it will drive more business than they’ll lose. The system is fucked

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

TBF it only made anyone mad.

Many screeched omigodtheyreturningmahkidsgay. Many were annoyed at the blatant pretense at support that did zero actual supporting and just hoped to make a buck. The rest didn't notice or care.

I guess pretend support is still better than no support, but I didn't believe they were genuine or courageous a year ago, so it's not surprising for them to confirm it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I can’t believe the US Navy is scared of bigots.

I wouldn’t trust them to defend the coasts.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're not afraid of bigots. They're afraid of low recruitment numbers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Fucking spineless cowards

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 142 points 10 months ago (3 children)

"Our research shows us that the pink dollar isn't as profitable as the bigot dollar. We don't actually care about anything other than profits."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The North Face previously garnered pushback for its “Summer of Pride” event series in 2022 and 2023 in partnership with drag queen Pattiegonia

I’m sorry, which company partnered with a drag queen named Pattiegonia?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Interesting and not shocking. But I was just making a joke about the fact that one of their main competitors is Patagonia and the drag queen’s name is Pattiegonia

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

some super brilliant marketing exec probably thought it would swipe a few clicks from people misspelling their competitor's name in search engines.

he works at wendy's now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

No no, it’s actually a pretty good idea lol. I mean, the exec may very well work at a Wendy’s but that’s probably more so because of all the right wing backlash

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Also not surprising. Chouinard is a lefty who has pledged a ton to environmental causes. I think he put the company into some kind of trust so that the profits will go to environmental causes even after he dies. Really great company

Edit: I think this goes into the details: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/14/climate/patagonia-climate-philanthropy-chouinard.html

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 115 points 10 months ago (2 children)

“We don’t give in to terrorists. Only domestic terrorists.”

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago

"We don't give in to terrorists. Unless they have money. Then we give them goods and/or services in exchange for money."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›