this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
395 points (93.0% liked)

politics

18898 readers
3036 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

So… he’s basically getting an employee evaluation.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The rumors were correct? Holy shit.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

If I want to watch someone give Putin a softjob, I can always watch Oliver Stone's interviews.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

At this point, it seems very prescient that red was chosen as the color of the con movement....maybe that's why tiny d always wears a red tie - maybe someone should feed that the Qtards.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

Tucker ‘Bussy’ Carlson.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The “interview” is just cover.

My bet is Putin is vetting Tucker Carlson for Trump’s running mate.

Once Tucker kisses the ring, and likely commits a crime (or other misdeeds) on Putin’s orders (to serve as puppet-string kompromat for Putin’s plans), Putin will give the blessing for Trump to announce Tucker Carlson as his VP running mate.

Then, just imagine a 2028 Presidential bid from Tucker (win or lose in ‘24)…

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

I think you are right, been suspecting it for a while. Only reason he wouldn't is because he doesn't want to be outshined.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Nah, Cucker seems to be fitting well into his role as Goebbels 2.0

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My bet is Putin is vetting Tucker Carlson for Trump’s running mate.

Tucker Carlson would be absolutely dead weight on the ticket. Nobody who isn't already voting for Trump would want that guy anywhere near the White House. He'd be lucky to get Trump's Communications Director slot.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

He's media savvy and when he was in front of a camera, had millions of drooling followers who would eat anything he fed them. Don't underestimate him (or turnip), the cult of personality will fall in line.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Ahh yes, the propagandist too controversial even for Fox News. Tens of millions of Americans will watch this heavily curated interview and think that Putin is a pretty good guy.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He was only too controversial for them when he cost them a shitload of money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

^ This. Same reason O'Lielly is not there.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Is this like a managerial review of his boss or something? Stupid HR probably gonna throw little tucker a pizza party.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if Carlson is fully aware of how deep the hole is that he is about to crawl into. He likely already is a full russian stooge, but if not, he's about to find out just how tyrannical despots can be when you're in their power. Imagine the open and implied threats to his life and his family as they walk him through exactly what to say. Imagine how they dissuade him when he suggests certain questions that he wants to ask. If he strays from the exact script? Somebody get a picture of him when he returns to the states, and if it's within a week of the interview, see how many bruises, cuts, limps, or other signs of 'treatment' there are.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I just don't understand why.

He already has enough money to never work again. What is wrong with these people?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

When you're a psychopath of one description or another, who knows what might motivate you?

Most of us normal people are content to be free to spend time with friends and family doing the things we love. Imagine if you couldn't give a shit about that, and that's basically the world's most successful people.

Their lineages have spent recent human history honing capitalism to be the vessel for the freedom of their kind. Money buys you freedom from consequences most of the time. That shouldn't be possible.

The internet opened up their world for us to see, and for a moment it looked like we might sieze control. Instead, we let ourselves be manipulates into thinking they do in fact give a shit, or at least if we tag along we'll be winners too.

The names we know are the ones who court controversy for the thrill.

Elon Musk is an excellent example. Whatever talents he has are moot next to his moral insanity. All he cares about is having a legacy, and achieving the things he wants. He just pays lip service to any real altruism. I mean, he's the last person who needs to preside over horrific working conditions. He even bans PPE because he doesn't like bright colors.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Money is a drug more dangerous than heroin.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Have to keep your boot on the throat or they might take a breath and see clearly.

load more comments
view more: next ›