There's a big range between "never takes any risks" and "takes stupid pointless risks."
samus12345
joined 1 year ago
They do tend to be inversely proportionate.
Bind, not protect, protect, but not bind.
Yeah, I deleted the comment a while ago when I read another response explaining that. TIL!
(For those who haven't seen the episode, it was naggers.)
So she was stealing their money. Very unethical. She'll probably go far in corporate America.
Much better to overestimate risk than underestimate it when the risk is death!
"Suck it, Sajack! Ho-ho-ho-ho-ho!"
Right talking points so far:
She's not a man
She's not white
She laughs
She doesn't have kids of her own
Yup, just like CRT or woke, if I see a Republican mention it my brain translates it to "white nationalist grievance."
view more: next ›
Even if they weren't evil pieces of shit, they'd have every right to change the VP if they want.