this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
18 points (66.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26511 readers
1093 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Gamers like to make it sound like $70 is a new thing today for video games. When, I've seen adverts of games back in late 90s and early 90s that were priced $70. It's always been around so I find it ridiculous that so many of them complain that the pricing is too high when, it's been a thing.

Even more dumb is that sales are stupidly frequent so why even bother trying to pay $70 anyways besides FOMO.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I'm a little out of the loop on this one, so this might be a dumb question. For $70 do you get the game, or just most of it? Do certain features cost more? Does it require a online subscription?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

Crime. Since people hear about it more often they think there is more crime, but in actually overall crime has gone down. There was more crime before 24 hour news not less. You just are hearing about crimes that in the past wouldn't have made the news.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sex. Everything you're doing (unless you're using some type of new technology or device) had been done for thousands of years.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

There's an entire civilization in pre European contact Americas that only depicted anal sex in all their artwork.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Billionaires. We have a wild discrepancy in wealth distribution, but there have always been pharos and kings and tsars, along with accompanying nobles, minor royalty, etc.

And it's easy to argue that those rulers had far more power. Elon Musk can't order my head removed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

And they controlled vast amounts of land, where thousands or millions of people lived.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Trans people.

Trans people have existed forever and conservatives are trying to pretend it's a new thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The first patient to receive a sex reassignment surgery fought in the battle of the bulge.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Did they fight against the bulge, or for it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

"Battle of the Bulge" ironically sounds like a great name for a battle around Trans rights.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

🤣🤣🤣

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Where I live, this still applies to lesbians and gay men. I am not joking.

And I'm in a country where an overwhelming majority of the population, both old and new, is so conservative that it's basically religious nationalism at this point. I've said the name of that country so many times that I'm getting bored of it now, but it's basically Morocco.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

The other day I learned about this chap who lived in the 19th century stealing married women https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Allent_(trans_man)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Idk where you bought your games from but up until the last few years the standard was $60 for a new game. Anything more was a special edition of the game.

The only time I've paid more than $60 for a new game was if I bought a special edition.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

If memory serves, the bump from a "standard" new video game costing $50 to $60 happened around 2010. Accounting for inflation that $60 is a little over $70, so it doesn't seem entirely unreasonable for them to be $70 even if I don't like it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

$70 cartridges have been around since the SNES days.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Just because they existed doesn't mean they were the standard.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But it was the standard for new ‘AAA’ games for the first couple months of release.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

For how long?

I'll admit I didn't start buying new games myself until around the original halo release.

Halo was actually the first game I bought with my own money. It was $60 2 days after release. The next game I bought brand new was call of duty 3. $60 the day after release.

As I said before the only new games I've purchased that cost more than $60 were the special editions of the base games. And it's not like I wasn't buying top name games. Borderlands 2 $60. Zelda skyward sword/tp/botw $60. For honor $60. Halo 2 broke world records for most anticipated media and it's release price from day one was $60.

The standard for new games was $60.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I dunno, I seem to have misplaced my Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Game Prices by Week. :D

Just pointing out that back in the day it was not unusual to have the most desirable games cost $70 for a while. It wasn't special editions / GOTY stuff - those type of things didn't even exist yet. So I'd imagine whoever is downvoting you is an old curmudgeon like me that lived through the Dawn of Video Games like I did, and remembers this as not being uncommon. Hell, even normal NES games were $50 or so. I remember paying that much for Final Fantasy when it came out. Once you add in inflation, that's an expensive game!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The first computer game I ever bought was Wizardry: Proving Grounds of the Mad Overlord for $80 in 1982. The new version is $35 on Steam and wishlisted because I'm a cheap bastard now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Daaaammmnnnn, I played Wizardry 8 back in the day and that game was fantastic. Never played any of the earlier ones though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I vividly remember purchasing Final Fantasy 3 in the early 90 for $69.95. It was the first video game I purchased with my own money and it was like a years worth of allowance.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

People have less spendable money on average than 20 years ago and there are more games and more unfinished or broken games, that are sold for a higher price. Games instead should get cheaper, as people have less money to spend. Your assumption that games used to be more expensive is therefore flawed.

That said, AI generated images, aka fake images and nudes of celebrities etc, are seen as new now. But we could do that with image editing software for decades, just the speed changed. Now everyone acts like as we require new laws, but they are already in place. AI video generation might be a bit more tricky, as one used to not be able to do that without a lot of time and money, but still, it's nothing new and laws are in place. We won't be able to stop this technological advancement and we even harm people by that. If only rich corporates dictate the AI environment, we destroy possible startups, harm citizens and also give evil actors more power, because the later doesn't care about laws, while the average Joe's privacy and other rights are getting more and more restricted.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Regarding AI, it’s not just the speed but the accessibility. Photoshop takes skills that not everyone will learn. AI only requires the skills of a crossed monkey and can be done on anyone at a volume that even photoshop wont do unless you’re dedicated.

As an example, grab several photos of Jo Blow and you can have them nude in minutes. Photoshop, I assume, would require hours for several photos?

I don’t know photoshop, so maybe I am totally off.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why do people act like it's righteous to suck off game companies? They won't send you a copy for defending their honor online, that's some mall ninja shit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I am sure some are bootlickers but we now know that game companies pay social media companies to atro turf ...

So half the time that idiot ain't a person, just an npc doing his job.

With a little skill they are pretty easy to spot.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

What? Just because you found 1 game at 70 dollars back in the 90s doesn't mean that it's a fair price for games?

Even now with tons of inflation since 1990 it's a ridiculous price and reserved only for top tier games that everyone wants to buy, like Baldurs Gate.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

To be fair, there are a lot more $5 games nowadays that provide hours of good quality content.

There were plenty older games that charged full price and are shit aswell. And there was less selection..

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Teens acting like teens.

There are writings dating back to ancient Greece of people complaining about young people and how stupid/lazy/whatever they are compared to the previous generations.

Maybe we can drop that one already.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Teenagers are just filled with hormones and poor decision-making skills. They're big balls of attitude and it still seems to astound people when they want to be argumentative.

load more comments
view more: next ›