this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
100 points (96.3% liked)

Asklemmy

48279 readers
654 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I make the specification of non-linux because otherwise this would just become a thread full of obscure distros that do the same thing as a million other distros.

Some lesser known OSs:

  • AROS - based on Amiga OS, has some derivatives like IcarOS and MorphOS
  • Haiku - based on BeOS
  • Redox - Unix-like, made in Rust (might technically count as linux?)
  • Serenity - Unix-like, very late 90s look and feel
  • Kolibri - Tiny OS, the image is ~44MB. It also has a smaller version that fits in a single floppy.
  • PhantomOS - When 3 Russians decide to turn everything about a typical OS upside down.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I wish Nokia N900 / N950 with Maemo or Meego OS. And full opensource, full MPL or MIT licensed.

I truly wish SailfishOS could be that replacement but I've been burnt too many times already.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Definitely Haiku, BeOS had a lot of neat ideas in it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Back to the ol' times of Windows.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That too NT 5.x ! I wish we had stuck with Windows 2000 Professional.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Here's the link for Redox OS btw: https://www.redox-os.org/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Guix GNU/Hurd of course lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

GEM

Because it's truly outrageous

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll second GEM. The 520ST was my first computer as well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It did a lot with a little!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. My first computer was an Atari 520ST. No hard drive, 520k of ram, and and GEM ran on a dedicated chip.

It's a graphical shell over DOS, but still exists.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe minix? Because microkernel.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

Honestly, if I had this magic power, I'd pick something like Ubuntu or Fedora. The exact pick doesn't matter, I don't want this to devolve into a holy war, but I want to "The Year of the Linux Desktop" to stop being a tongue in cheek meme. I want Windows and Apple to have to make meaningful changes to maintain their market share.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Haiku, but honestly I'm just happy to see the conversations here

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nobody's mentioned Guix. It's a GNU project, which is like Nix, but has a number of novel features. I'll copy in from my own thread about it:

Based on what I’ve heard so far: GNU Shepard instead of systemd, a package manager that compiles things from source and allows user-defined compiler options, a totally different way of arranging system files, and Guile-Scheme is used for everything; it sounds like there’s no other kind of configuration anywhere.

It's planned to be Hurd compatible, so I'd argue it counts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

There are a few aspects we need to consider...

For the UI, I would go with beOS, Haiku is cool, but the look is a bit too modern, I love the clean look of beOS's UI

For the best compabillity, after a lot of work, ReactOS, a project aiming to create an open source os that is binary compatible with Windows 2000.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

seL4

A formally verified microkernel

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Serenity for sure. I love the 90s aesthetic and would like to see it make a comeback. At the very least I'd like to see their Ladybird browser become mainstream - we really need more alternatives to the Chromium family.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That "Unix" os from the og jurassic park movie.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was actually Unix. Specifically the fsn file manager for IRIX.

There's a Linux clone called fsv.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's real?! TIL...

I can't decide if that changes my answer or not... lol Seems like a cumbersome way to browse files, but maybe that's because it isn't how I've learned...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

I remember running BeOS back in the early 90s so I guess I’d go with Haiku

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

TempleOS, because for it to go mainstream, a sizeable chunk of the population would need to go fully insane, and I think that'd be interesting

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe more insane would actually cancel out the insanity already existing?

Or do I now sound insane?

Anyway, came for Temple OS as well.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yup. Ctrl+F'd here.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

OpenBSD. Imagine everyone just running a secure OS.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί