this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
815 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

70248 readers
3494 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Steve@startrek.website 25 points 1 year ago
[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 116 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That article was worthless.... basically streaming is expensive and not as awesome as it once was. There you go whole article

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's still way more awesome than cable ever was. Sure you can have all the services all at once and pay as much as a cable bill, or you can rotate your subscriptions and pay way less.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m not sure about that. Popular shows get canceled, unfinished. Huge price hikes, and you can’t jump to another provider to watch the shows at a new rate or call and threaten to cancel to get a new rate. Sure, there are a few good series, but it’s still mostly crap. Sure, you can watch some older movies on demand, but plenty aren’t available, are available on some other service, and/or require you to pay a rental fee if you can find it. Prices keep climbing, ads are constantly a threat, and they place more restrictions on how many devices you’re allowed to watch on.

They are doing everything they can to re-insert the worst aspects of cable.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

My hot take, in the digital age, all direct marketing should be opt-in with the platform. Opt-in for industries with the ability to ban specific advertisers.

[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I went from cable to satellite in 2008 and then went strictly streaming in 2010. I've had Disney + and Netflix off and on over the years but I've found that I don't need any of them. There are plenty of things to watch for free elsewhere and plenty of other things to do than watch shows that will be canceled after the first season.

I won't watch a show unless it's done. This bullshit of cancelling after one season is ass.

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The music industry figured it out. Now the video streaming industry needs to. Until then, arrrrrr.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The music industry figured it out: I listen to way more music than ever before and I willingly pay more than ever before

Video streaming keeps trying to make my experience more frustrating, less value to me. They’re scrounging for dollars is driving me away. I’ve considered my options for making video entertainment enjoyable again, and I’m just tired of the whole thing. I’m spending more time in projects, more time online, more time reading ebooks from my library. I’m watching less video than before, enjoying it less, getting less value for my money and it’s just all not worth it. Their efforts to profit more from my attention are getting them less of it and losing my willingness to pay

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Yo ho ho my friend. Yo ho ho.

[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What is that Hulu you are talking about, we never got that in Mexico (nor Pandora now that I am talking about it).

In this day and age where everyone wants its piece of the cake it is weird to me that they never cared about more countries xd.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It may have been more difficult and expensive than you’d expect. My understanding was distribution contracts tend to be per country. Netflix can’t just stream all the stuff from north of the border, but have to start over with buying rights to everything in a new country

This made more sense when distributors were all per country but not so much for streamers

[–] freebread@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Another streaming service that started around the same time as Netflix's. More focused on TV shows and now owned by Disney.

[–] Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hulu is owned by cable companies, they didn’t learn everyone hates advertising

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UckyBon@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If you don't watch it it looks like nothing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

MUuuhhaaaaa. I worked for a cable company for a little over a decade. I remember commenting when people everywhere were talking about its death that streaming would soon be just like cable. They called me a fool. MUuuhhaaaaa!

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago

This is what you made me think of

1000002368

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

I have a reminder to cancel Amazon Prime in a month. I never really used the TV portion until a few months ago and was like, fine ... the selection sucks but it's alright. After they introduced the ads now, it's unusable to me. I'm getting rid of it entirely and not rewarding this type of behaviour.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It’ll be cable when they start making you contact customer retention in order to cancel.

[–] tedu@azorius.net 11 points 1 year ago

What is this "world of content" the author is talking about? 17 years ago, the streaming options on Netflix were the previous season of Friday Night Lights, and... that was it. A few years later they got The Office, but never the current season. So you were always behind. These articles never seem to include a graph of available content over time.

[–] redeyejedi@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yes, but no. Cable didn't used to let you watch all seasons of a specific show on any given day and time of your choosing.

[–] pixel_prophet@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Until the show you want to watch gets removed because they don't want to pay the licensing fee for it anymore.

The original content is often very mid.

[–] snownyte@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty much.

If you missed an episode of a show on cable television. Well, you're shit out of luck unless it's a show that the network didn't mind running re-runs of, but re-runs only applied for shows that were popular. And if you missed an episode of a show that wasn't popular, again you were shit out of luck and hope to one day acquire it through a VHS or a DVD or these days, blu-ray or on streaming.

Network programming was always like this.

[–] Huschke@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

That is also the reason everything reset to the status quo at the end of every episode.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm old enough to remember when cable didn't have ads. I was really young, maybe 5ish, but even then it was confusing to me when they started adding commercials. That was for bad TV with the antenna. Then it was only HBO that didn't have ads, but we couldn't afford that until I was much older.

EDIT: I guess my memories of being 5 years old aren't very accurate.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you got it over antenna, it most definitely was not cable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Basic cable has always had commercials along with the over the air channels. Premium channels didn’t.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You're right. I guess I was remembering premium channels and some niche channels that were cable-only. Most channels available on early cable were just piping non-local broadcast channels down a cable.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, cable was first used to allow people to watch the same channels that were available over the air just from a more locations than what was available via antenna at their home (and with better reception), so it had the same commercials.

Premium channels were commercial-less for 7 or 9 years (can't remember exactly) before the first premium channel decided to start running adverts.

[–] BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

There also used to be product placement ads during the shows too. I feel like that’s also more insidious when Jed Clampett and Granny are telling you every episode to smoke a Winston and eat Kellogg’s.

[–] isles@lemmy.world 131 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When the ideas run dry for infinite growth, everything old is new again.

[–] snownyte@kbin.social 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You're correct.

Social Media is the perfect example of this. Everytime a new social media network arrives, they always boast about being able to do things you could already have done with the other 9 social media networks. Sharing pictures and video, chatting .etc. They're all things we could've already have done far way back in the days of messaging software like AIM. It's nothing new, it's just recycled ideas being treated as new.

The only things that have ever improved were the amount of size of videos and pictures we can share and the speed in which we're able to do it with. That's it.

The well of finding new ideas has ran dry, because they've all been tried and done before many times. New name, same old shit.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

But Tom was my friend whereas Zuck is an alien.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The convenience you required is now mandatory.

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] snownyte@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Um, duh?

Is the author just noticing this? We've been piecing this together for the past 7 some odd years. The day hit us was when YouTube decided to be cute by adding in it's own network via YouTubeTV and with it's onslaught of ads.

load more comments