this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
1711 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

58063 readers
3129 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

It will not make a difference. The internet is free and open by design. You can always scrape the internet any time. A partnership will do nothing but make it a little bit more convenient for them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Good to know that stackoverflow will not be a trustable place to find solutuons anymore.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Frankly, the solution here isn’t vandalism, it’s setting up a competing side and copying the content over. The license of stackoverflow makes that explicitly legal. Anything else is just playing around and hoping that a company acts against its own interests, which has rarely ever worked before.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The license of stackoverflow makes that explicitly legal

How and why is it illegal (I will take down my post about vandlism until I discuss this.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’m not saying vandalism is illegal. I’m say that it borders on immoral and that there is a better, more radical (and thus effective) alternative that one might expect to be illegal but in fact isn’t.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

My post was mostly to just insert invisable marks like   to your answers to screw over any machine that is sensitive to unicode.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

If i was stack overflow I would've transferred my backups to OpenAI weeks before the announcement for this very reason.

This is also assuming the LLMs weren't already fed with scraped SO data years ago.

It's a small act of rebellion but SO already has your data and they'll do whatever they want with it, including mine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

OpenAI clearly already scraped the pre-LLM (aka actually useful) content from SO, this entire deal is happening after the fact to avoid litigation.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I think you're 100% correct in assuming they've already fed it data scraped from SO. I've previously gotten code samples from ChatGPT that was clearly from SO down to the comments in the code. Even reverse searched some of the code and found the question it was from.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

There’s also the possibility of adding to the wonderful irony of making the AI more useful than the original by having content that’s no longer accessible through through the original. It doesn’t get more enshittified than that, even if Prashanth Chandrasekar is too out of touch to ever regret his decision.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It’s true that it’s mostly a symbolic act, but the rebellion matters, especially from old accounts. It’s also a nice way to mark the time after which I never participated in SO again. After my ban expires, I’ll deface my questions again. And again. Until they permaban me.

load more comments
view more: next ›