Pepsi's daughter? Com'on girl, no dynasties please.
this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
145 points (96.2% liked)
politics
24396 readers
2203 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Wiener
As co-chair of the California Legislative Jewish Caucus, Wiener has been instrumental in advancing several pieces of legislation aimed at promoting Holocaust education, as well as countering antisemitism and anti-Israel activism, especially on university campuses.[144][145] Wiener and CLJC worked to include "guardrails" in the ethnic studies legislation to "provide clear direction to local school districts and the California Department of Education that anti-Jewish and anti-Israel content cannot be included in the teaching of ethnic studies".[146][147] Through CLJC, Wiener played an important role in securing $80 million from the state budget for various Jewish community priorities for 2024-2025,[148] as well as a similar amount in 2021.[149] Wiener and CLJC have also been criticized by Jewish Voice for Peace for "twist[ing] criticism [of Israel] into antisemitism"[150] and opposing a Gaza cease-fire resolution in Sacramento, while only stating that Israel should "be more surgical" in Gaza.[151] Wiener and other CLJC officials commended California State University Chancellor Mildred García for placing Sonoma State University President Mike Lee on leave after Lee announced support for an academic boycott of Israel in agreement with protesters and Students for Justice in Palestine,[152][153][154] which was seen as aligning with the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, and which Wiener described as "horrific and wrong".[155][156][157]
Please no.
Hard to say where he really sits without knowing more about him, but voice wise it seems he was calling for people to protest Israel's actions while not performing them specifically at Jewish events. Which I get. Bringing the protests to specifically Jewish events in the U.S. isn't protesting Israel, it draws the idea that if you are Jewish you are Israel, which is false. His comments that Palestinians should be able to live without fear I haven't seen anyone mentioning and the fact that they are quoting him from 2021 saying Israel should be more surgical, 2 years before things escalated from the Oct 7th attack and prior to any ground invasion.
A U.S. Senator speaking about Israel overreach in 2021 is actually surprising.
I'm willing to bet a loaf of bread was < 20¢ the last time something similar aimed at her seat.
"Who's that?"
"He's Scott Wiener"
"I know he's got wiener but what's his name?"
Thanks for the clarification on Tony vs Scott. With so many weiners out there I sometimes get confused about which is which.
Too many dicks on the dance floor.
They can't beat our weiner!
Saikat Chakrabarti, AOC’s former campaign manager, is actually running against Pelosi and not just launching an exploratory bid. https://www.saikat.us/en
Damn I hadn’t heard about this. Thanks for spreading the word!
Sweet, was mad that there was no serious candidate challenging Pelosi from the left this last election. SF deserves better.
Idk man.. if he wins it'll put pelosi out of work.. and it'll put the devs at autopilot,the Nancy pelosi stock trading app all out of work.
https://www.joinautopilot.com/
/s obviously because fuck her and her insider trading
Didn't Pelosi say she wasn't going to run for reelection this time around? Or am I mistaking her for one of the other Do-Nothing Democrat Fossils?
googles JFC she is 85.
Man there so needs to be an upperbound on age of elected officials.
Like how does this woman who has been in office since 1987 have any idea what's going on in the common person's living room?
All of these fossils both R and D need to be gone. Wow.
*I thought this reply was going to go a different direction... But I was so put off by her ages and time in office.
Just wow.
Minimum age to run, no reason not to have a maximum.
And involved in the California DNC since the '70s
Filings list Wiener as a candidate in 2028, and since launching an exploratory committee in 2023, he’s repeatedly said he would never challenge the two-time former House speaker from San Francisco. However, if Pelosi decides not to seek another term next year — a real possibility for the 85-year-old — then Wiener could simply form a new committee for 2026 and transfer the campaign funds.
Well, that's disappointing. The Democratic Party doesn't need any more spineless cowards waiting their turn. If you don't have the balls to tell an 85-year-old to retire, you don't have the balls to stand up to fascism.
B-but, if we stop rewarding seniority and nothing else even if we run terrible losing campaigns... Multiple times in a row... Th-then it'll never be MY turn...
Dear God, before you know it, the DNC will be some kind of meritocracy, where the most charismatic candidates with the most popular ideals win! The horror!
I did get jumpscared by the Weiner name. He was such a disappointment.
Carlos Danger
Electile Dysfunction
Introducing new faces, fresh ideas!
Not sure if I'd be that confident (unless I missed some sarcasm). The article quotes him as staying he'd never want to challenge her for her seat, and he's just waiting for it to open once she retires so he can run. Also refers to Pelosi as an "icon" that he wants to succeed. That's not an indicator of someone who wants to go against the establishment.
Come on, does this really need the /s to catch the sarcasm?
Thought it might have been sarcasm, but honestly wasn't sure.
Since the headline is missing context and could be interpreted as a newcomer looking to kick Pelosi out of her seat, and knowing how many users on Lemmy just reply to headlines without reading the article itself, the possibility of that happening just seemed stronger I guess.
At a minimum this guy won't have the same level of intuitional clout Pelosi used many many times to hinder progressive policies and engage in political horse trading. So even if this guy is literally a 1-for-1 Pelosi clone he'll be a much weaker hurdle to overcome than she was.