He should fuck off and die.
this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
285 points (97.7% liked)
politics
19138 readers
3344 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
"I'm shocked after creating this monster I'm unable to control it" - mitch McConnell
If only there was a classic book everyone knows about to warn him
He could absolutely control it, he just doesn't want to make any hard choices.
I'm not sure at this point mitch could control MAGA, even trying to pull weight with any remaining classic Republicans probably wouldn't have any chance of reining in the party back from full on MAGA since a lot still are thinking of reelection and going against MAGA is a career ender
"Hey Mitch, you won't be able to control this monster"- Everyone, for ten years.
"Idfc lol, I'm old and rich-" Mitch
I need to pick up some fireworks for when that traitor finally dies.
Once you announce retirement, you're lame duck. This is not news to McConnell or anyone else.
Under the fool's watchless eye cretins rise.
He is a useful idiot, yes.
Of course you had options, you traitorous piece of shit:
- You could refuse to endorse Trump
- You could switch parties and become a Democrat
- You could resign
- You could kill yourself
You had tons of options, but you'd rather let democracy burn anyway.
Hell he could kill a coworker. Mitch McConnell shooting up the RNC would be an interesting turn of events
Or he could have not stolen a court seat.
He could have not backstabbed everyone and everything.
Alas, he's a piece of shit.
Wouldn't even have to become a Democrat: the "independent" label exists
“The issue is, what kind of influence, even if I had chosen to get involved in the presidential election, what kind of influence would I have had?”
What a worm.
Well, well, well... If it isn't the consequences of my own actions.
I don’t think he can control his own sphincter.
So, in order to avoid having no influence, you use all of your influence to advance someone else's ends? Idk man, seems like you could have told Trump to eat a dick on national TV, told the Republican senators that you were never going to have a better chance to get rid of his ass, and voted to convict and bar him from politics if it passed.
Sure, I don't get to be a senator, but the fuck would I want to be a senator for, if that was the price of entry? You get to be a pawn, and get played? Pass, old man.
Don’t worry Bitch, Putin does.
The man has been leading by example for years. Remember when, during the Obama presidency, he refused to even call a vote on any Supreme Court nominees?
He has shown time and time again that he doesn't care about the unwritten gentleman's rules that the government has been (more or less) abiding by for centuries, and now he's shocked that his party is overrun by people with zero interest in working towards anything other than destruction?
He's a fool and he's dragged us down with him.
I'm still angry about that. We have the eight Justices of the Supreme Court and Neil Gorsuch, IMO.
"I have no power to stop this" says man who refused to even try to use the ACTUAL POWER HE HAD stop this
Fuck off and die McConnell, preferably in the most painful way possible. He refused to impeach the fucker, so this is just whining to try to protect his legacy, but this is 10000% his fault.
You cannot control a room full of demented dogs with terminal rabies.
Absolute scum.
Hey guys, I poured some diesel on this fire, and hid all the extinguishers. Turns out that it's hard to control it now.
I think petrol is worse if you want a better example than diesel.
We all understand the message, no need to clarify the type of fire it should be.
Ideally, it'd be a turd-fire, but afaik, they don't exist, so I went with diesel.
Petrol instantly vaporizes and explodes, and exhausts itself more or less right away. Diesel takes time to heat up enough, but once it does, it's a raging inferno that easily reignites by itself after being extinguished.
Source: I've started (sanctioned, legal, and utilitarian) fires with both
How would it go if they were mixed and ignited?
Diesel burns slowly, though petrol makes diesel easier to ignite.
We mix them 3:1 Diesel/Petrol (called 'driptorch' fuel, used in 'driptorches') to safely put fire to the ground when we need to.
Source: am firefighter.
Never tried, but I would suspect that petrol could be an effective accelerant, as it'd reach its flash point long before the diesel does.
That's some amazing logic.
I have absolutely no power and am utterly helpless. I'll stay in the job.
Doddering pensioner wonders why he has no control
It's a bit worse than that - they're following the path he laid down... he just likes to seem like he has no control when they're acting heinous, but if they get the house and senate again he'd be happy to install more conservative judges.
“Wait, why isn’t the monster I’ve created listening to me??”