They could let an AI decide
this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
167 points (95.1% liked)
Technology
60058 readers
2807 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
My first thought exactly :P
"AI" again.
Jobs which technically could be replaced with that will not be because they require a living person doing social stuff.
Most jobs technically can't be.
How about those C-level management positions that nobody needs? 🤷🏻♂️
The problem is ai needs work to train on.
As soon as the AIs learn to say "let's circle back" and "I just wanted to touch base on our product strategy," you know it's over for those motherfuckers.
Nah. At that point they'll just delete the AI and spend millions on telling people that AI is bad and needs to be banned.
Then this whole thing should eat its own tail then. Good.
Would be funny if they asked AI and the AI decided the CEOs should be first to go.
Entire industries cannibalizing one another to eliminate competition and their industry's ability and desire to make the products/services they existed for in the first place. TimeWarnerHBODiscoveryblahblah shelving projects for tax cheats, making lazy appeals to nostalgia for what the companies they destroyed once made, and cheap reality garbage instead of actual media comes to mind, but it's terminal capitalism, it's happening in every sector.
Then they lay off their workers cutting their workforce to the bone by activist shareholder demand, eliminating potential consumers of the economy.
Now they want to use AI to cut the bone.
The economy no longer has any interest in the human beings it was created as a lowly tool to serve. We're being cut out entirely, except the small class of private owners, of course.
AI could and should be used to free mankind from tedious labor, that's why such innovation should have come from well funded PUBLIC research our economy should have been oriented to feed for PUBLIC benefit.
Instead, like every other technology, it will be used as yet another cudgel against society. This civilization is dogshit.
A-fuckin-goddamn-men.
There is no tool that is OWNED that will ever serve the public without first having to pay the owner.
There really are some things that should be publicly owned, but of course that LeAvEs MoNeY oN tHe tAbLe and that's a worse sin than murder to our society...
Welcome to late stage capitalism where the game's made up and the points don't matter.
Privatize the profits and socialize the losses.
I've tried to use "AI" to help me with minor programming tasks, or to start basic projects, it's really bad. As in, it takes me more effort to fix the garbage it outputs than it would have to write it from scratch. In addition to that, it writes things badly in non-obvious ways. Junior engineers make similar mistakes to each other, because they're working logically. "AI" makes weird mistakes because it's not working in the same way a human mind does.
Soon AI will make AI content for other AI products to interact with, cutting humans off the production and consumer side entirely. Then tech giants will just pay and charge each other infinitely and we‘re rid of their nonsense because we simply stop looking at screens that have nothing worth watching to offer anymore.
Twitter is an innovator in this field. If they license their content to LLMs like Reddit has then it will truly become an ouroboros, the AI eating its own tail.
There is a book series called rats bats and vats, which is a humorous book that has the shareholders own everything and only clones/animals do all the real work. If you were not a shareholder, you were akin to a slave.
If we keep going, the ai and ourselves will be the non-shareholders in this situation.
I Put on my list, sounds like it has some animal farm vibes.
It's wacky for sure. It's by a pro-union author and you can see it first hand.
Probably CEOs