this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
250 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4212 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago

Have we ever had such a clear display of wealth and/or fame keeping a criminal from justice?

I'm so sick of the most advantaged people in our country getting away with everything and anything they do wrong. This isn't just a crime, it's fucking despicable.

This guy goes after family members and judges like a shitty, inbred orange mobster - all for crimes he is 100% guilty of. He can't even follow orders to not slander those he's being convicted of battering.

This guy is such an awful fucking person. He is the worst of humanity manifest in a clown costume, complete with a painted face.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Id like to point out that the "hush money" case is actually an election interference case. Much like how "storming the capitol" was a coup attempt.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Wasn't the hush money campaign finance laws?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What gag order? If it's not enforced, and won't be enforced, it's just a meaningless piece of paper.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

All laws are meaningless to the wealthy and powerful. Trump is showing us this in real time, and it just keeps getting worse.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 43 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Throw the worthless orange Russian spy into prison.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

I'd have thought by now, you guys would have figured out that it's never going to happen. Ever. Trump or anyone in his position will never set foot in jail.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 7 months ago

It doesn’t matter what it covers. They’re never gonna do anything.

[–] [email protected] 92 points 7 months ago (1 children)

if hes not in jail, it doesnt matter because there are no consequences

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago

At this point yes, and why should any of us abide by these kangaroo court laws? The courts have been illegitimate for decades, and this whiny little bitch of an orange shit stain is the proof.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Trump’s legal team pushed back on the notion, suggesting prosecutors’ requested clarification amounts to an expansion of the restrictions.

“The express terms of the gag order do not apply in the manner claimed by the People, which they seem to acknowledge by suggesting the need to ‘avoid any doubt,’” Trump attorneys Susan Necheles and Todd Blanche wrote in their letter.

The former president himself has not held back from aiming his ire at the families of his perceived foes across his numerous legal battles, targeting the spouses and children of udges overseeing his cases and prosecutors.

Merchan at a Monday hearing refused Trump’s lawyers demand that the trial be postponed beyond April 15.

The former president cited her employment in his demand last year that the judge recuse himself, but Merchan refused in part based on guidance from an ethics advisory committee.

In prosecutors’ letter, Steinglass urged the judge to warn Trump he was violating the gag order and sanction him if he continues disregarding it, arguing his attacks are highly likely to influence witnesses and others.


The original article contains 555 words, the summary contains 177 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!